Hindu Vivek Kendra
A RESOURCE CENTER FOR THE PROMOTION OF HINDUTVA
   
 
 
«« Back
archive: 'Humiliating' deal puzzles Pak media

'Humiliating' deal puzzles Pak media

UNI
Rediff on Net
July 6, 1999


    Title: 'Humiliating' deal puzzles Pak media
    Author: UNI 
    Publication: Rediff on Net
    Date: July 6, 1999 
    
    Puzzled Pakistani newspapers today called on the government to explain
    what Prime Minister Nawaz Sharief agreed to do in Kashmir in his
    weekend talks with US President Bill Clinton. 
    
    ''The joint statement of Prime Minister Nawaz Sharief and President
    Clinton, as released by the White House, is likely to leave many in
    Pakistan bewildered,'' The Nation newspaper said. 
    
    The agreement said Pakistan would take 'concrete steps' to restore the
    Line of Control, which, US officials said, meant that Islamabad would
    pull back forces which captured strategic Indian heights in its Kargil
    sector. 
    
    Editorials asked if this meant pulling out Mujahideen Muslim militant
    groups, a reversal of Pakistan's position that it has no influence
    over Kashmiri 'freedom fighters'. 
    
    ''While our government spokesmen will, as usual, try to put all kinds
    of spin on this statement, the people have a right to know what the
    country has gained and what it has lost,'' said The News. 
    
    ''Mr Sharief, after all, himself sought a meeting whose outcome, as is
    evident from the joint statement, is the very opposite of his stated
    objective and recent rhetoric,'' The News editorial said. 
    
    Editorials questioned whether Clinton's commitment to take a 'personal
    interest' in promoting the resumption of Indo-Pakistani peace talks
    would move the 50-year Kashmir dispute any closer to resolution. 
    
    ''India is not bound to offer any quid pro quo for any pullout
    Pakistan might undertake. And there is no provision in the statement
    which obliges the US make India offer any quid pro quo. In that sense,
    the statement is one-sided,'' said The Nation. 
    
    ''In other words, if President Clinton too fails, what would Pakistan
    have received for its pains? Nothing. In fact, Pakistan would probably
    be much worse off than it is now,'' it said. 
    
    The News echoed this line: ''It is plain that the joint statement
    places obligations on Pakistan to take concrete steps but hardly
    commits the US to promote a solution of the Kashmir dispute. 
    
    ''Reaffirming the sanctity of the Line of Control as the way to defuse
    the current fighting is an unmistakable affirmation of the position
    taken by the Indians throughout two months of the Kargil crisis,'' it
    said. 
    
    ''The government must also explain why the prime minister needed to go
    all the way to Washington, amid unprecedented international pressure
    on Islamabad, just to commit himself to taking steps without securing
    any commitment that the larger issue of Kashmir would be addressed,''
    The News said. 
    
    The Nation commented, ''The point to ponder for our policy-makers in
    Islamabad is: why was the Kargil initiative taken in the first place,
    if it has to be abandoned in such a hasty and humiliating manner?''
    



Back                          Top

«« Back
 
 
 
  Search Articles
 
  Special Annoucements