Hindu Vivek Kendra
A RESOURCE CENTER FOR THE PROMOTION OF HINDUTVA
   
 
 
«« Back
"Dramatic positive shift towards India" under bush administration

"Dramatic positive shift towards India" under bush administration

Author: Aziz Haniffa, India Abroad News Service
Publication: Yahoo News
Date: March 22, 2001

Representative Benjamin Gilman, who chairs the South Asian subcommittee of the powerful House International Relations Committee, has predicted "a dramatic positive shift towards India" under the new Bush administration.  Speaking at the inaugural dinner of the Indian American National Foundation (IANF) -- a newly constituted umbrella organization of four major Indian American groups that have come together pledging to represent the common interests of the estimated 1.5 million Indian Americans -- Gilman said, "Past policy that turned a blind eye on China's sale of missile and nuclear technology to Pakistan is under close scrutiny by the new administration."

Gilman, who has access to intelligence reports, disclosed that "the way the new Bush team has lined up, it is certain that Beijing's dangerous meddling aimed at threatening democratic India will finally receive an appropriate response."

The lawmaker said, "The same is true for Pakistan's support for terrorism in Kashmir and its assistance to the misguided Taliban who give refuge to Osama bin Laden."

Gilman noted that "last week's destruction of all the Buddhist religious structures throughout the country by the Taliban confirmed for all the world that we are dealing with extreme Pushtun tribal nationalists whose Islamic fundamentalist beliefs preach intolerance of other peoples and cultures."

"The United States and all the countries in the region, and especially India, need to assist the Afghan Uzbeks, Tajiks, Turkmens and Hazaras who are in the Northern Alliance and are battling against these Pashtun nationalists," he said, and added: "The United States should work closely with India in this effort."

Gilman said that India's attempts "to promote regional stability by assisting democratic movements are in tune with our own national interests."

"Regrettably," he argued," the countries surrounding India, such as China, Pakistan and Burma don't hold our same values and are intent on undermining India." Thus, Gilman declared, "Accordingly, be prepared to see the Bush administration respond in ways that will appropriately reflect India's important role in the region."

He also asserted that the Bush administration's "policy toward terrorism is clear. The Bush White House recognizes India as a source of regional democratic stability and, therefore, is a natural target of the same terrorist movements that have murdered Americans and are opposed to our interests. China, which lends support to Pakistan, needs to receive a firm signal from the international community that such behavior will no longer be tolerated."

Gilman said that Beijing should "never have been awarded with a 'strategic partnership' with the United States. India is a natural ally and as chairman of the subcommittee on the Middle East and South Asia, I intend to ensure that our policy finally reflects this reality."

He warned that "if we do not soon address the root causes of India's security difficulties by reining in China and its critical support for Pakistan and also Pakistan's assistance to the Taliban, then at the very least we must begin to focus directly on the Taliban itself."

"We need to recognize it for what it is, not as a spin off of the Cold War Afghan freedom fighters but as a chauvinist, ethnic movement that has a myopic view of the world," he said." The Taliban has caused and will cause far more damage to international stability than any other recent nationalist movement."

Senator John Kerry, who is a ranking member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, in his remarks, said that unlike during the Cold War years, "now there is no excuse," for the United States not to have a much closer and strategic relationship with India. "Now it is clear the course that Pakistan is on, and it's clear the course India is on."

Consequently, Kerry argued, "We need a policy that is prepared to distinguish between India and Pakistan and to recognize that India," is Washington's natural ally.

Kerry called on the Bush administration to immediately lift the sanctions imposed on India after the May 1998 Pokhran nuclear tests and "to recognize this new reality, "that India is all about as the pre-eminent power in South Asia" and "build on the relationship that President Clinton's visit so properly and so effectively began."

Similar sentiments were expressed by Representative Ed Royce, Republican co-chair of the Congressional Caucus on India and Indian Americans, who said the relationship now offers "tremendous opportunities to correct some of the errors that we have made."

He said an urgent corrective measure is the lifting of the sanctions "and the sooner it happens the better." Royce also called for a military relationship with India, saying "we need to be looking at joint military-to-military exercises with India," because he firmly believed that "India is a force for stability in Asia."

Royce also said it is imperative that "we need to work in a bipartisan way," to get President Bush to visit India, as the Caucus, working in concert with the community had got President Clinton to make the trip to India -- the first by a U.S. chief executive after 22 years.
 


Back                          Top

«« Back
 
 
 
  Search Articles
 
  Special Annoucements