Hindu Vivek Kendra
A RESOURCE CENTER FOR THE PROMOTION OF HINDUTVA
   
 
 
«« Back
Tell it like it is

Tell it like it is

Author: Moorthy Muthuswamy
Publication: The Pioneer
Date: September 6, 2002

The New York Times seems to be on a campaign to discredit Indian Americans and India. It has given prominence to an Indian Muslim woman on a crusade to discredit and divide us on the issue of Godhra, a carnage for which Indian Muslims were responsible. There has been no similar crusade by Indian Muslims or their diaspora about blocking funds flowing from the US, West Asia and Pakistan to those who preach hatred. These funds have turned Kashmir into a hotbed of Islamic fundamentalism, with several thousands of non-Muslims ethnically cleansed, killed or raped. And they have kept the majority of Indian Muslims from progressing and joining the mainstream.

In his article, 'Where Freedom Reigns' (August 14), Times columnist Tom Friedman does not mention the Muslim community's involvement in the Godhra train burning, though he blames the 'Hindu nationalist' Government for the pogrom. This attitude is similar to that displayed by the Arab network Al-Jazeera, notorious for its one-sided reporting of the Israel-Palestinian conflict or the US-led war on terror.

The New York Times has an blinkered outlook about religious conflict in South Asia. An editorial, 'Instability in India' (March 7), on Ayodhya and its implications merely parroted the jaundiced views of two writers, Mr Pankaj Mishra and Mr Shashi Tharoor, that had appeared on the op-ed pages. The latter had not spoken of the Babri and other mosques being built on the site of razed temples. Nor the inability of Muslims to coexist with others and respect their beliefs in South Asia. The beleaguered Hindu community was demonised, while Muslims were projected as victims!

Many of us sent letters to the Editor, expressing a more realistic view. Not a single one was published. The editorial had echoed flawed analysis, berating the Indian Government and, by extension, Hindus. I wrote to the Times CEO, pointing out that his editorial board had acted as judge, jury and executioner. I suggested that events in India be viewed within the overall context of Muslim-non-Muslim conflict in South Asia. So far, I have not received a reply.

Conveying to the international media the nature and impact of Muslim-non-Muslim conflict in South Asia is important, since it is about the imposition of fascism in the name of religion. The attributes of a community become apparent when it wields power through majority status. Every Muslim majority region in South Asia -Pakistan, Bangladesh or India's Kashmir Valley-has seen a massive drop in non-Muslim population since Partition. Pakistan has seen its minority population reduce from over 20 to less than three per cent; Bangladesh from over 30 to about 10 per cent; non-Muslim population in the Kashmir Valley has been decimated since 1989. Pakistan discriminates against minorities in religious practice, voting, law and employment. It uses blasphemy laws to persecute them. However, Muslim population increased from about 10 per cent in 1947 to 14 per cent in Hindu majority secular India.

Religious indoctrination has transformed South Asian Muslims into fundamentalists and oppressors. Non-Muslims are now being attacked in the only land they can live as free citizens: India. This is religious terrorism and genocide, faced also by the US and Israel. We must assert ourselves as a community and as wagers of the war on terror. I request people to write to NYT, urging it to provide space for alternative views that are so much closer to the truth.
 


Back                          Top

«« Back
 
 
 
  Search Articles
 
  Special Annoucements