Hindu Vivek Kendra
A RESOURCE CENTER FOR THE PROMOTION OF HINDUTVA
   
 
 
«« Back
Beer Goggles in Bollywood

Beer Goggles in Bollywood

Author: Arindam Banerji
Publication: Sify News
Date:
URL: http://sify.com/news/fullstory.php?id=13450047&page=1

You probably did not know 5-year old Zahida of Doda; truth of the matter is, neither did I. Sadly, I've come to know something of the last moments of her life. So, let me relate to you what I now know.

Late on the night of March 21, a small group of LeT terrorists forcibly entered the home of Zahida's father Fetah Mohammed in the mountainous hamlet of Tanka. Feta's reluctance to entertain the Pakistanis proved fatal. The terrorists simply grenaded little Zahida and her 4-year old brother to their deaths. Two more Indian children added to the weekly death score of the LeT.

But, there is another story yet. A day or two or three later, while flipping through the news, I happened to hear about an Indian actress profusely apologizing to Pakistanis in Lahore, for "hurting their sentiments".

The incongruity struck me as odd to say the least, if not a little nauseating. You see, both Indian and Pakistani newspapers have reported multiple times, that LeT (or Jamaat-ud- Dawaa as it now likes to be called) has been raising unheard of sums of money in donations from ordinary Pakistanis in the last few months. And its not as if the LeT, in its brochures, periodicals and posters, is shy about announcing its intentions or even depicting trophy pictures of dead Indians.

Yet, we had here, an Indian actress who was groveling and asking for forgiveness from a people, who openly and knowingly funded the killing of little Zahida and her brother.

So, if you're anything like me, and had the misfortune of putting two and two together on these news pieces, some nausea and indigestion had to have happened.

But, before I get too far ahead of myself - let me suggest that the rest of this article is best viewed, if you go up to your browser, look under internet options and turn on the sarcasm tag. For some of you, this tag may be turned on automatically.

First let me introduce you to Iqbal Durrani, a bollywood writer-director, who is helping Imran Khan, the ex-cricketer and a hardliner on Kashmir, raise money for a cancer hospital in Pakistan. Says Iqbal bhai: "I have known Imran and want to make a documentary on his cancer hospital. I felt that now that Indo-Pak relations are improving why not make a film which both Indians and Pakistanis will identify with...Imran is such a humanitarian that if he were president he'd remove all soldiers from the border! Titled 'Nahin Nahin', the movie involves an Indian, a Pakistani and a Kashmiri"

Two questions for Durrani ji? First, when is he making the film about an Indian, Pakistani and a Marathi or what about the movie about an Indian, Pakistani and a Tamilian or that one about an Indian, Pakistani and an Assamese - after all isn't that what Imran and his Pakistani buddies really want you to do? Secondly, this great humanitarian Imran? Isn't he the same dude who announced in a pompous press release of his party: "We must continue to support the Kashmiri Jihad against Indian repression and oppression in Kashmir". Ah!!! A humanitarian and a terrorist supporter to boot or is it that you have to be a terrorist promoter to be considered a humanitarian, in Bollywood these days?? Who knows!!

Wonder what went through Mr. Durrani's mind, when he thought up this one. Quite probably, the thought process went something like this "Who do we help raise money for today (a) Indian kids orphaned in the Gujarat earthquake and riots? Nope, Nope (b) Indians displaced due to terrorism in Kashmir and the North East? Nope, not worthy enough (c) Some alleged Pakistani hospital, that no one has seen, promised to you by a shady Pakistani playboy turned politician, who strongly supports killing Indian women and children in Kashmir? Eureka, (c) it is, (c) it is. What could be a better choice? Why did I not think of it earlier?".

Nice thinking, Mr. Durrani, Keep it up!! It would seem that the Pakistani people agree with you whole-heartedly, too? In fact, on the holy occasion of Eid, as the Friday Times of Pakistan reports, Pakistani citizens also decided to donate to people who support and promote the killing of Indian women and children? Only, in their case, they gave the money directly to the Jamaat-ul-Dawa. Of course, it is yet-another matter that this year's donations of Rs 780 million for Jihad-e-Kashmir far exceeded last year's donations for the same cause? This can be explained away as part of the "on-going peace efforts by ordinary people of both nations". You know the same kind of reciprocal peace efforts, where we fix holes in the hearts of their babies, while they fix bombs in the school buses of our babies. You get my drift? Equal-equal, peace initiatives from people on both sides.

Lately, JP Dutta, the man who made LOC, has landed himself in quite a soup. He had the nerve to make a somewhat pro-India movie. Of course, he clearly misinformed us, by not showing the gruesome 22-day treatment of the Lt. Saurabh Kalia and other such representative accounts of the Pakistani army. But, we won't hold that against him. Poor guy is in enough trouble as it. But, what's the world coming to? In these days of peace and sublime acceptance of Pakistani terrorism, this man has stooped low enough to make a pro-India movie in Bollywood? Hai Ram!! Drag him out into the town square and castrate the B******!!

Oh! For those who would like some light bedtime reading about the recreation activities of the Pakistani army, see http://www.gendercide.org/case_bangladesh.html.

The ultra-liberal Hollywood, from which our tinsel town often gets inspiration, regularly makes big budget movies to keep reminding us about the horrors of the Jewish holocaust. Today's Bollywood would never imagine showing Pakistani perpetrated Bangladesh or Afghan genocides, whose horrors in many cases far exceeded the Nazi holocaust. Could be worse though? Seems there is a self-proclaimed Gandhian running around with a perverted fetish for tying rakhis on the very same genocidal army-men from across the border.

This constant whining and sniffling about anti-Pakistan movies, which really means, "movies that show Pakistanis somewhat like they really are" has reached quite a crescendo. It started with Akshay and Urmila, followed by Shahrukh and then everything got lost in the din. Smaller stars had to rise above the din? Visibility is a must, you see. This was going to be difficult, since many of the tricks have already been used up.

What would you do to get some attention in this love-fest for Pakistan? Hug and kiss some terrorists? No chance, Urmila's already done it (as you'll see later). Maybe, praising or absolving all Pakistani terrorists would do? Wrong call again, Sharukh's already gone ahead in this game as in "they [the terrorists] must be having their reasons for doing it, not questioning who is right or wrong". Aahh! here's an approach at visibility that's probably not been tried? How about helping out Pakistani terrorists carry out operations in India? Been there, done that? At least, Sanjay Dutt has.

So, where others may have failed? Bright-eyed Shilpa Shetty stepped to the plate? She had to go that extra mile to prove her loyalty to the terrorist cause. So, she did. In Lahore, as I mentioned in my opening, she showed her allegiance to the Pakistani flag by kissing it and apologized profusely to the denizens of the terrorist state for "unintentionally hurting Pakistani sentiments".

Think about this for a second? We now have Indians apologizing to the Pakistanis for, I repeat, "hurting their sentiments"!!! Essentially "Hai, hai, how bad, we Indians are yaar? How could we even think of calling some Pakistanis terrorists, just because they go around killing our women and children in bulk- this is not fair".

Most civilized people, rarely apologize to, or pay allegiance to the flag of, a people that are openly killing their countrymen in the thousands, but, Shilpa ji ka kya kehna. "Good show, Shilpaji? That sure was original - the grieving parents of 5-year old Zahida and her 4-year old brother, would undoubtedly appreciate your "humanitarian" gesture; maybe little Zahida's father, Fetah Mohammed will even send you a thank-you card.

Gotta admit though, this kind of undying allegiance is difficult to buy? Must have cost Pakistan a pretty penny. Here's a suggestion? Maybe, just maybe? That apology from us Indians could wait till ordinary Pakistanis stop raising money to kill babies like Zahida or may be after they shut down the offices of the United Jehad Council, whose only purpose is to kill Indians? Just a thought!!

Backslapping aside, we must give serious consideration to what a semi-intellectual and yet another of the "humanitarian types" has been telling us, of late. Of course, as we have already discovered, in Bollywood to be a humanitarian, you must have strong sympathies for terrorists. Case in point - apparently, the peripherally Bollywoodish, Nandita Das, recently played a leading role in a movie called "Lal Salaam", which as the Tribune puts it "virtually portrays Maoists as benefactors fighting for the cause of the poor and tribal folks? Although the movie failed commercially, it is reportedly a hit among the PWG cadres".

Yeah, yeah. PWG and Maoists, the very same terrorists, that execute families, kidnap children, rape at will, assassinate elected leaders and force farmers not to grow crops, all in the name of their anti-national motto. I can scarcely imagine what a Hollywood actress would have to go through, if she dared to glorify, say the Nazis or perhaps even the Al Qaeda. But, then again, I sympathize with Ms. Das? In our tinsel town, things are different? To be called an activist or humanitarian, you must be pro-terrorist; not quite as remunerative to be anti-terrorist, it seems.

But, we digress again. So, Ms. Nandita Das pontificated recently on many things. First, she suggested that 70% of the audience was just not smart enough to understand her movies like Earth and Fire. Fine, building castles in the air is not a crime? But, then after some rough finger-wagging at the media about biases and partial representations, she informed us that "making films like LoC and Border was not a healthy trend". Apparently, such things cause misconceptions about Pakistan.

After having thought about this issue a little bit, I have to admit, that I completely agree with Ms. Das. After all wouldn't it be a nasty "misrepresentation" of our tall fair almost Arabic friends from across the border, if we short, dark Indians resorted to showing such gory "mistruths" like Pakistanis proudly announcing their intentions to "improve" the genetic makeup of Bangladeshis, right before going out and raping 3 lakh hapless Bangladeshi women?

Would it not be totally unfair to show women's groups all over India protesting the heinous massacres of Gujarat, while Pakistani women on hearing about the ongoing rapes of lakhs of Bangladeshi women gleefully declaring "Let them (the Pakistani army) rape those Bengali women? Maybe it will make their next generation prettier"?

Would it not be grossly "dishonest" to show ordinary Pakistani businessmen falling all over themselves to bequeath money (as reported by a Lahore daily) to such worthy causes as beating in the brains of 9-year olds or shooting down 2-year olds or setting fire to women, before putting it out and watch them die in pain?

Wouldn't LOC have caused "misconceptions" if it had actually shown the Pakistanis ripping out eyes, piercing ear-drums and chopping off limbs of Lt. Saurabh Kalia and 5 men, slowly over a period of a viciously painful 22 days? Wouldn't the Indian movie goers have become "biased" if Indian movies regularly depicted the gory scenes of Pakistanis killing 10,000 Bangladeshis every day, not for 10, 20 or 30 days, but for 267 days at a stretch?

Wouldn't such "lurid exaggerations" about Pakistani culture, make the machete wielding Hutu tribesmen or the cannibalistic Congo rebels, feel threatened about their place in history. Naah! we could never do that - would lead to all kinds of misconceptions!!

So, in hindsight, I support this avowed humanitarian on this issue, completely!!

You've probably guessed by now, things can only get better from here. The bizarre tale of Ms. Matondkar comes to mind. Believe me, weird can barely describe this one. Ms. Matondkar, for those who're behind the times, is a filmi-belle and the spawn of a local proponent of some oddball Pakistan-India peace forum? The very same forum, whose declarations may well be considered seditious within India and government/LeT approved talking points within Pakistan. But, here's how it all went down, as I've briefly said before:

"Most of the week of September 1, our army and BSF were fighting and getting killed by terrorists, well supplied by the Pakistani army, in Kathua. On early Saturday morning, terrorists trained and funded by the Pakistani army, used a car-bomb to kill 8 Indians. Almost every day that week, Pakistani-army minions carried out horrific acts on Indians. On Friday, two women of Surankote hills were abducted, tortured brutally, had their limbs and private parts chopped off, before finally, being killed. On Thursday, Ghulam Ahmed of Sanglani, had his arms and legs chopped off, before being beheaded."

"Yet, on Saturday, pretty-faced Urmilaji, basking in the glow of cameras declared "I feel so close to the people in Pakistan". Teary-eyed Urmila handed over a bouquet of flowers to Pakistani army rangers and threw scalding water on anti-Pakistani feelings".

Strange happenings don't ya think? In most places, people support their own troops. But, what do ya know about them tinsel town folks? Here a woman with dodgy parental links gets all kinds of kudos. Kudos, mind you, for hugging and kissing the soldiers of a country, that's busy slaughtering people of her own nation, at that very same moment, not more than a few hundred miles away from her. Bravo!!

Nonetheless, you have to admit that this was a great publicity coup - it made for a perfect photo-op. and massive free visibility resulted; very well thought out, indeed. Who cares, if bullet-ridden jawan, Balbir Singh's mother was receiving a very different kind of bouquet that day, thanks to the very same "bouquet-receiving" organization from Pakistan. The TV News snippet on Ms. Matondkar's tear-jerker for peace sure looked good!! In the end, that's all that counts.

All right, enough with the cynicism already!!? Please look at the internet options menu of your browser; the sarcasm tag has probably outlived its useful existence by now.

Thankfully, the real world in India is nothing like the make-believe one in Bollywood. In the real world, Lt. Triveni Singh's mother, Pushpalata with tears of mixed pride and loss, told us "Let every mother give birth to children like Triveni who refuse to abandon their guns and run away from the battlefield even if their decision costs them their life".

In the make believe one of Bollywood, in the month of August last year, the same month when Pakistan perpetrated 300 bloody attacks in Kashmir alone, not counting the bomb blasts in Bombay and Assam, Akshay Kumar unnecessarily announced that he would never say anything negative about Pakistanis in his movies.

The man from India, Lt. Triveni Singh jumped in front of bullets and grenades to save the lives of his fellow citizens, thus dying in the effort. The man from Bollywood, Akshay Kumar, drew a fictitious wall between terrorists and their financiers, promoters and supporters, the Pakistanis. Triveni had a mission to accomplish and an undying loyalty to his country. Akshay had a paying audience in Pakistan to satisfy and so, randomly indulges in obscene propaganda, all in the name of not doing so of course. Thank God, many more mothers in India raise their sons to be like Triveni Singh. Jai Hind!!

Author's disclaimer on anti-Muslim vs. anti-Pakistan:

Q: Do Bollywood movies often show the entire Muslim community in bad light?
A: Yes and when they do they should be tarred and feathered for it. Rightfully so.

Q: Are movies that depict the truth about Pakistan, anti-Muslim or anti-Indian Muslims?
A: Hell No. Indian Muslims are just that. Indians. Let us not insult them in bulk. Pakistan in any case, is probably the most anti-Muslim country in the world. See their genocide tally in Bangladesh, Afghanistan and against their own Shias. Once again, let us not insult the entire Muslim community by equating them with Pakistan.
 


Back                          Top

«« Back
 
 
 
  Search Articles
 
  Special Annoucements