In Malaysia, persons of Indian origin-Hindus,
to be precise-have been economically marginalised. They are mostly at the bottom
of the ladder. Article 153 of the Malaysian Constitution provides special privileges
for Malayans only. Politically, they hardly count. They wanted to organise a
rally to ventilate their grievances, but were denied permission by the police.
More than two years back, in an article entitled
'Is Hinduism in Retreat?', I had defined a Hindu as "basically non-aggressive,
not deeply concerned about his places of worship being defiled or even demolished,
is not particularly offended by others making fun of his gods and goddesses,
does not object to other religions' preachers converting his flock, and is not
greatly exercised over the abduction and molestation of his women and daughters".
As the years roll by, I am increasingly convinced
about the correctness of the definition. If at all any change has to be made,
probably the words "non-aggressive" should be replaced by "coward".
It is indeed mortifying that the average Hindu has today lost all pride in his
religion and is apologetic about his identity. His religiosity is limited to
paying obeisance in the temple and observing meaningless rituals. The objective
is essentially to seek forgiveness for the sins committed and blessings for
the unfulfilled materialistic desires.
In Malaysia, persons of Indian origin - Hindus,
to be precise - have been economically marginalised. They are mostly at the
bottom of the ladder. Article 153 of the Malaysian Constitution provides special
privileges for Malayans only. Politically, they hardly count. They wanted to
organise a rally to ventilate their grievances, but were denied permission by
the police. On November 25, 2007, when nearly 20,000 people gathered near the
Petronas Twin Towers, carrying portraits of Mahatma Gandhi to highlight the
non-violent nature of their protest, the police cracked down on them using tear
gas and water cannons. Leaders of the Hindu Rights Action Force (Hindraf) were
arrested. Five of them have been detained under the Internal Security Act, which
allows detention without trial.
In religious matters, the Indians are subjected
to discrimination of the worst kind, thanks to Malaysia gradually leaning towards
Wahabi-style of Islam. Temples are demolished now and then. What is worse, in
many cases, the devotees were not even allowed to retrieve the images of the
deities which were also smashed. It is estimated that more than 150 temples
have been razed to the ground so far. The destruction of a non-descript shrine
in Ayodhya led to tremors all over the country and even outside but the destruction
of more than 150 temples in Malaysia has created hardly a ripple in the country.
The government, after showing some concern in
the initial stages, washed its hands off after the Malaysian government took
the stand that it was their internal matter. Suppressing an ethnic minority's
religious freedom cannot be justified under any circumstances. Human rights
have universal application. The Malaysian government's charge that the persons
of Indian origin have their links with LTTE is preposterous on the face of it.
P Uthayakumar, founder member of the Hindraf, has stoutly denied the same. "We
have got zero links with terrorism. We have got zero links with LTTE. We do
not support violence. We are a non-violent group", he said.
There is no point in expecting much from the
government which is always obsessed by political considerations. National interests
or national pride do not mean much to them. But what has been the response from
other significant groups? The BJP's reaction has been muted. The Vishwa Hindu
Parishad has kept quiet. Organisations like Bajrang Dal, which are prompt to
take up frivolous matters, have not cared to raise their little finger. The
Shankaracharyas appear to be in a trance. Religious leaders, who take pride
in flaunting their international linkages, have not spoken a word.
The middle class of India, which is basking
in the sunshine of economic growth will continue visiting Malaysia for a holiday
bash. And the media will have no compunctions in publishing advertisements promoting
tourism to Malaysia. The Human Rights groups in the country, which could have
raised the issue at international fora, have preferred to turn the blind eye
to the developments in the neighbourhood.
Ironically, there have been voices of protests
in UK and in USA. In UK, nineteen Members of Parliament, cutting across party
lines, have urged upon the British government to take up the matter with the
Malaysian government in the strongest possible manner. "This House notes
with great concern the stated intention of the Government of Malaysia to demolish
79 Hindu temples", the motion moved by them said. The US Commission on
International Religious Freedom has urged President Bush to take up the matter
with Kuala Lumpur and "insist that immediate measures be taken to protect
sacred sites and prevent further destruction".
What do you expect under these circumstances?
Indians, particularly their majority community, can just be kicked around in
any part of the world. The great actors of this 'Mera Bharat Mahan' are busy
enjoying the good things of life. They have no time to think about pride or
self-respect.
