Syed’s Bamiyan claim rebutted (Letters to the Editor)

Author: Rahul Gautam, New Delhi
Publication: BJP Today
Date: April 16-30, 2001
 
Mr. Syed Shahabuddin sounds unconvincing while condemning the Taliban action in Bamiyan as un-Islamic. I quote below Dr. B. R. Ambedkar on the subject:

After observing that the Persian word “but” meaning “idol” is derived from Buddha, he writes “Thus the origin of the word indicates that in the Muslim mind idol worship had come to be identified with the religion of Buddha. To the Muslims they were one and the same thing. The mission to break idols thus became the mission to destroy Buddhism. Islam destroyed Buddhism not only in India but wherever it went. Bactria, Parthia Afghanistan, Gandhara and Chinese Turkestan ... in al these countries Islam destroyed Buddhism”. More precisely: The Muslim invaders sacked the Buddhist universities of Nalanda. They razed to the ground Buddhist monasteries with which the country was studded. The monks fled away in thousands. A very large number were killed outright by the Muslim commanders”. D. D. Kosambi, a historian of her own Marxist school, confirms that Nalanda was sacked “by a handful of Muslim raiders under Mohammed bin Bakhtyar Khalji about AD 1200” and that “the tremendous complex at Sarnath which had grown up on the site of the first Buddhist sermon was wrecked beyond recovery, thus ending a continuous tradition of refuge and meeting place for ascetics which went back to the centuries before Buddha”.

Who would believe that the Taliban does not have sympathisers outside Afghanistan?
 


Back                          Top

This site is part of Dharma Universe LLC websites.
Copyrighted 2009-2011, Dharma Universe.