Ashok Mahajan
The Observer
May 8, 1999
Title: The Evangelical Frontiers of Vatican Author: Ashok Mahajan Publication: The Observer Date: May 8, 1999 With so much debate in recent months on missionary activities within the country, by now it is obvious that the two major provenances whence it is generated are the US and Italy. Whereas Western mediamen and. writers such as Francois Gautier, Jon Stock, Stephen Alter and Barbara Kingsolver have in fair measure highlighted the fundamentalist streaks and groups of the New World, there has not been much diffusion about the means and methodology adopted by the Holy Pontiffs men at Rome. The Vatican city is a unique independent state of Europe. Roughly triangular in shape, it is less than half a square kilometre in extent, even smaller than the tiny political entities of Monaco and Liechenstein. Despite its minuscule size, however, it has been said to possess an influence greater than that of Italy itself. It is the headquarters of the largest branch of the Christian religion, the Roman Catholic Church whose power extends across Western and Eastern Europe (except Russia), Africa, Asia (except China), Latin America and Canada. Vatican's sovereignty was recognised by the Fascist Italian Government in the Lateran Treaty and Concordat of 1929. The various wings or congregations that assist the Pope in the day-to-day exercise of his primatial jurisdiction over the Catholic Church are collectively known as the Roman Curia. The members of the Sacred College of Cardinals head these different bureaus. One of them is designated as the Secretary of State who directs both the Papal Secretariat as well as the Council for the public Affairs of the Church. Presently it is Cardinal Angelo Sodano, the right hand man and mouthpiece of the feeble and ailing Pope John Paul II. There are bureaus for administering the Oriental Churches, the Bishops, and the Clergy. A separate Congregation devotes itself to the Causes of Saints, leading to beatification and canonization; another for Religious and Secular Institutes, and still another for the Sacraments and Divine Worship, and for Catholic Education. The Holy See is a convoluted labyrinthine of sanctimonious heads. But the one that should concern us most as Indians is the Congregation for the Propagation of Faith. This is the most sumptuously-funded wing headed by a Cardinal, which plans and promotes world-wide proselytisations. It is this part of the Roman Curia with which Mother Teresa was most closely associated, as are several present-day Archbishops in India. There is substance in the charge of the BJP that several scribes in the English print-media belonging to the minority community are deliberately raising the bogey of attacks of Christians so as to unite the Catholic and the non-Catholic denominations. Also, an organisation called the World Council of Churches sought to end the schisms between the Roman Catholics and the various Protestant groups. Seemingly the plank on which they based their arguments for unity was the projection of the majority community as their common threat. Within the Roman Curia, too, there is a whole secretariat for promoting Christian oneness at a global scale - the term for which is 'ecumenism'. The Vatican Council convened in 1960 by Pope John XXIII was a major step towards ecumenism. The urge for unity is believed in part to be the result of the frustrations of the Holy Pontiff who views a 'divided Church' as anomalous to the spirit of Christ. If the first step is towards unification of all Christians, the second is the 'homogenisation' and 'assimilation' of all non-Christians into being the followers of Christ. This, in short, is the goal of the Congregation of the Propagation of Faith. A few years ago, when the question of the celibacy of the clergy came up for debate, the Holy See ruled that what dictated the Church's position was the "Jesus example". Jesus, it was said, was the high priest par excellence and since he remained a celibate it was necessary for the clergy to remain so. The absence of any scriptural text was not relevant. Now, if one is to follow the papal argument of "Jesus' example", one can hardly fault an educated person for being critical of the lifestyle of the episcopacy at Rome. Poverty along with chastity was the essence of Christ. The Vatican palace which lies to the north of St Peter's Basilica, surpasses the pomp and splendour of any palace of a European monarch. It is surrounded by medieval and Renaissance walls and has six entrances, only three of which are open to the public. There are several museums along the east and north walls and extensive gardens to the northwest. A hundred Swiss Guards, magnificently attired, act as security guards. The Vatican has its banking organisation, its telephone system, post office and railway station. It issues its own stamps and currency, which are interchangeable with those of Italy. Incomes, investments and expenditures of the Papal government are veiled in secrecy. The Pope has his own coat of arms in front of the government palace and when he flies of Rome, his aircraft must be painted with his insignia. The Papal Commission for Vatican City is composed of three cardinals and a secretary. Administrative powers are delegated to a governor, who may also compile legislation. The governor is assisted by a central council composed of the directors of the secretariat, the office of monuments, museums and galleries. The upkeep of Vatican property, salaries and the Papal Foreign Service involves millions of dollars yearly. How does an ordinary Roman Catholic of India reconcile himself to the temporal razzle-dazzle of the papacy with the spartan austerity of Christ? Does he not see a contradiction here, when the Pope himself is variously described as 'the vicar of Christ' and a 'servant of the servants of God'? It is believed that the Congregation for the Propagation of Faith has limitless wealth at its disposal for funnelling it to the Third World. It is also believed that this wealth is not to be squandered on the 'pagans and heathens' just for the sake of Charity. Material inducements (land. house, money, job, education, hospital treatment, travel) is to be used for the barter of souls - especially in the tribal areas of the subcontinent. There are priceless art collections in the papal palaces. The famous Pio-clementino Museum was founded by Pope Clement XIV. The Chiaramonti Sculpture Gallery was established by Pope Pius VII in the nineteenth Century. The Gregorian Etruscan Museum was founded by Pope Gregory XVI, as also the Egyptian museum. The Pinacoteca, established by Pope Pius XI, boasts of an outstanding collection of Italian religious paintings. In 1956, the Papacy acquired works of modern artists such as 'Renoir, Seurat, Van Gogh, Rouault, Matisse and Picasso. Sometimes one feels that the esoteric and the aesthetic whims override humanitarian causes at Rome. Do our Archbishops and Bishops here question such peculiar peccadilloes of the presbyters and deacons of the Holy See? The fiscal transaction running into billions of dollars are never made public. No one exactly knows the assets of the Vatican. The European Catholics, unlike our Indian brethren, do not take the injunctions of the Pope seriously. There are frequent transgressions and gestures of irreverence. A glaring example will suffice. In 1996, a Bishop of Ireland, Right Reverend Roderick Wright went into hiding with his parishioner, 40-year-old Katherine MacPhee, a divorcee and mother of three children. To make matters worse, another woman revealed that the Bishop had fathered a boy, now 15 years old, by her. In Shoes of the Fisherman by Morris West, a work of fiction woven around the Papacy, a pious pilgrim is aghast at the extravaganzas of the apostolate. "These over-decorated apartments, these chapels, these museums and galleries- oh, they all reek of venality.' Agonising further, he says, 'How can I see the figure of my emaciated king with the Crown of thorns in these festooned and overfed Italian Cardinals? I will seek my Christ elsewhere.' And he flees the Varican in disgust. Presently, Cardinal J. Ratzinger, in-charge of the bureau for the propagation of Faith, is a man not too charitable to the Oriental Church and its slightly deviatory liturgical practices. But he is all for offering material goods for making converts. Conversions thus become a programmed event with a structured agenda and a work-force to accomplish this task. It has been happening in very deliberate manner in our country in the North-East. Proselytisation has brought about a change in the political scenario. A person like Vincent George will always, owe allegiance to Sonia Gandhi, and by proxy, to the Vatican. Should not the nation be apprehensive of this extraterritorial Loyalty.
|
||