Aparisim Ghosh
Time
May 3, 1999.
Title: The Riddle of the Sphinx (Excerpts) Author: Aparisim Ghosh Publication: Time Date: May 3, 1999. I should have known to take my phone off the hook last week when it began to look likely that Sonia Gandhi would become India's next prime minister. Sure enough, 1 was inundated by calls from Indian friends and acquaintances, some expressing disgust, others dismay. A few talked of giving up their citizenship, and at least one threatened to flush his passport down the toilet. All this because the lady was born, 52 years ago and 6,000 km away from New Delhi, as Sonia Maino. In chatrooms and e-mail chains, the Sonia jokes range from sarcastic to scatological. As is often the case with online humor, most of the Sonia jokes are ba- nal, juvenile. But they also touch some raw nerves. One pained recipient hit the Reply All key and wrote, "We should be crying, not laughing." I'll do neither. These expressions of anguish, the heart- felt and the hyperbolic, are misplaced. That Sonia was born in the village of Orbassano, near Turin, is irrelevant to her political pedigree. On the contrary, in the eyes of her Congress Party workers she represents something uniquely Indian: the haloed Nehru-Gandhi family. She is Indira's daughter-in- law, Rajiv's widow, the mother of Jawaharlal's great-grand-children. Italian? It wouldn't matter if she came from that new solar system scientists just discovered. It wouldn't matter to me, either. Don't get me wrong: 1 think Sonia makes a thoroughly undeserving candidate for prime minister, but not because of the nationality of her parents. I find her inappropriate for the very reason her party deems her to be perfect. It infuriates me that she requires no qualifications for the highest job in the land other than having been married to a Nehru-Gandhi. It disgusts me that no- body in the Congress seems to recognize that dynasties and democracies make a very bad mix. I'd happily overlook these flaws if 1 could believe that she would be a force for real change in Indian - and Congress - politics. If she were to indicate a willingness to cut away the cancers of sycophancy and venality that have eaten into India's grand old party, most people would be only too willing to embrace "Rome rule." But in the year she has been Congress president, Sonia has shown no desire to change anything. On the contrary, she has displayed the traits of most contemporary Indian politicians: a weakness for toadies and a lack of principle when pursuing power. If anything, Sonia has taken the party back to its worst days under her late mother- in-law and husband, reviving the long-dormant careers of the oiliest, most odious characters who once paid obeisance to Indira and Rajiv Gandhi. Many of these men are so thoroughly discredited in the eyes of Indian voters that they couldn't get elected dog-catcher of Delhi. Sadly, India's Westminster-style political system allows them to be nominated to the upper house of parliament and, in turn, the cabinet. (That's another lacuna the writers of the constitution overlooked.) The manner in which the Congress engineered Vajpayee's downfall-by making a deal with one of his coalition partners, the corpulent former actress Jayalalitha Jayaram shows Sonia will do anything for power, even conspire with one of the country's most reviled figures. This might make Sonia a heroine among her party faithful, but she will soon discover that the adulation ends there. Most Indian voters will not waste much thought on Sonia's genealogy. Indeed they will treat her as an Indian politician: with scorn and suspicion. Come the next general election - which the smart money says will be no later than November - the Congress, unable to convince the electorate that it has changed its spots, will once again fall short of a clear majority. That will start yet another cycle of short-lived coalition governments. How Italian. How Indian. How sad
|
||