Hindu Vivek Kendra
A RESOURCE CENTER FOR THE PROMOTION OF HINDUTVA
   
 
 
«« Back
archive: Language of Indus seals is Vedic Sanskrit: new book

Language of Indus seals is Vedic Sanskrit: new book

Sridhar Krishnaprasad
The Times of India
April 26, 1999


    Title: Language of Indus seals is Vedic Sanskrit: new book
    Author: Sridhar Krishnaprasad
    Publication: The Times of India 
    Date: April 26, 1999 
    
    A new book by two scholars N.S. Rajaram from Bangalore and Natwar Jha
    from Farraka, West Bengal, based on readings of over 2,000 seats of
    the Indus Valley civilisation sourced from the ruins of Mohenjo-Daro
    and Harappa, will present the conclusion that the language of the
    Indus seals is Vedic Sanskrit, of the Sutra period of Vedic
    literature. 
    
    The remnants of the Indus Valley civilisation still generate
    controversy ever since they were first discovered in 1921, when the
    Aryan invasion theory had already been formulated by European
    scholars. Subsequently, they had decided that the Indus Valley must be
    an earlier, "Dravidian" civilisation, destroyed, pushed southwards, by
    the Aryan migrants. Over the last few years, the Aryan invasion theory
    is being seen as just that by many scholars -a theory without basis in
    fact.
    
    Mr Rajaram, a former consultant to NASA, U.& in the field of computer
    science and artificial intelligence, told The Sunday Times of India
    that the book, scheduled to be out later this year, shows that the
    decipherment does not support the popular view that the Harappan
    civilisation is different from the Vedic, that the language of the
    seals is Proto-Dravidian (a theoretical construct for which not a
    single syllable has been found), or even that it is the ancestor of
    the Vedic (proto-Indo-Aryan). 
    
    "The language of the seals is Vedic Sanskrit, with a significant
    number of them containing words and phrases traceable to the ancient
    Vedic glossary Nighantu, compiled from still earlier sources by Yaska.
    The language is less archaic than that of the Rigveda, and corresponds
    closely to that of the later Vedic works like the Sutras and the
    Upanishads," he said.
    
    Despite the shortness of most messages, the rules of Vedic grammar and
    phonetics are clearly discernible in the structure of the Indus
    script, he said. Consonants are used but there is a deficiency of
    vowels - making them difficult to read without a knowledge of the
    context. Symbols for the "sa" and "ma" sound for example, can be read
    as either "soma" or "sama." In style, the messages are similar to the
    cryptic aphorisms for which the Sutra literature is famous. "Those
    familiar with the Sutras (Panini, Ashwalayana, Baudhayana) will
    recognise this immediately."
    
    In addition, the images on the seals are often symbolic representation
    of Vedic themes. The written messages often serve as Sutras or short
    formulas that when elaborated, serve to explain the symbolism of the
    image.
    
    "For example, the famous horned deity known as the Pashupathi seal has
    the message Ishya Dyata Mara -forces of destruction controlled by
    Iswara. Read along with symbolism, it means that the forces of
    creation and destruction of the universe belong to the Supreme," he
    said. 
    
    Mr Rajaram and Mr Jha, a traditional Vedic scholar, have come together
    for this book. Mr Jha first made the announcement that the writings on
    the seals were Sanskrit in the World Archaeology Conference in
    December 1994. "I first encountered Mr Jha when he published his
    'Vedic glossary on Indus seals connecting the writing to the Shulba
    Sutras, in October 1996. I am a mathematician and familiar with the
    Shulba Sutras. Every other month, there is someone claiming a
    decipherment. But I new this had substance," says Mr Rajaram.
    
    A major outcome of the decipherment is a clearly- defined historical
    context for the Harappan civilisation, radically different from
    conventional history. "It further demolishes the myth of the Aryan
    Invasion, a creation of European scholars with their own vested
    interests, using an artificial Biblical chronology. It has only served
    to divide the Indian people and pit one against another," he said.
    
    It also takes care of a paradox. There is a great body of Vedic
    literature, but no archaeological evidence. There is the
    archaeological evidence of the Indus valley, but no literature. How
    can that be?" asks Mr Rajaram.
    



Back                          Top

«« Back
 
 
 
  Search Articles
 
  Special Annoucements