Hindu Vivek Kendra
A RESOURCE CENTER FOR THE PROMOTION OF HINDUTVA
   
 
 
«« Back
archive: Maharashtrian, first & last (Interview with Mr Sharad Pawar)

Maharashtrian, first & last (Interview with Mr Sharad Pawar)

S Balakrishnan
The Times of India
May 25, 1999


    Title: Maharashtrian, first & last (Interview with Mr Sharad Pawar)
    Author: S Balakrishnan
    Publication: The Times of India
    Date: May 25, 1999
    
    He has taken the biggest gamble of his 40-year-long political career
    by openly revolting against Congress president Sonia Gandhi, who has
    inherited the dynastic mantle of the Nehru-Gandhi family.  Mr Sharad
    Pawar is grimly aware of the daunting task ahead of him.  But, he is
    in a rare mood for combat and he is determined to emerge as the key
    player after the Lok Sabha elections scheduled to be held later this
    year.  He has already announced plans to launch a new political
    party.  In between sips of Darjeeling tea late on Sunday evening, he
    spoke to S Balakrishnan at his flat at "Ramalaya" building on Peddar
    Road.
    
    Q: Soon after you were expelled from the Congress, you said you fell
    relieved since you had felt like a slave in the party.  Elaborate.
    A: I felt humiliated in the party.  There was hardly any involvement
    in the decision-making process.  Often I came to know about the
    party's decisions through the newspapers.  I found that a small
    coterie of people was taking decisions in the name of the so-called
    high command.  There was no scope for airing a dissenting opinion. 
    Often I was told that a particular statement or observation made by me
    was improper.  For example, I had candidly spoken about the political
    situation and other issues at a recent meeting of the Confederation of
    Indian Industries (CII) in New Delhi.  Immediately, I was told that my
    views were not liked by the leadership.  In the Congress, there are
    two types of people.  The first type consist of those who have
    contacts with the masses and the party rank and file and are genuinely
    concerned about the organisation.  The other type comprises of people
    who are totally rootless, but visit New Delhi very often and
    repeatedly demonstrate their sycophancy.  The tragedy is that it is
    the latter variety of people who are given importance.  This despite
    the fact that the party is paying a heavy price for encouraging
    sycophancy.  When I expressed my sincere concern over this sorry state
    of affairs, it was not liked and baseless motives were attributed to
    me.  I felt mentally tortured.
    
    Q: Don't you think that it was after Indira Gandhi assumed the
    leadership of the Congress that intra-party democracy all but vanished
    and sycophancy was mistaken for loyalty?
    A: But Indiraji had a tremendous feel for the pulse of the people. 
    Rajiv Gandhi could perfectly understand the mood of the youth.  They
    did not let their ears be poisoned by sycophants.
    
    Q: You supported the move to make Sonia Gandhi the party president and
    also the decision to amend the party constitution to enable her to
    become chairperson of the Congress Parliamentary Party (CPP) and you
    also campaigned with her during the last Lok Sabha elections.  Were
    you not aware all along that she was a person of foreign origin?
    A: The Congress has had four persons of foreign origin as its
    president.  So there was nothing wrong if she wanted to become the
    party president.  As for the CPP leader-ship issue, I must confess
    that none of us were even aware of the move till the last moment.  We
    were simply told that the leader - Mrs Gandhi - wants the amendment to
    be carried out.
    
    I did have reservations about this, but it was too late to oppose the
    move.  In any case, I did not make an issue of it, since we were in
    the opposition.  As for the election campaign, I wish to point out
    that never once did Sonia Gandhi say that she wanted to become the
    Prime Minister and nor did she project herself as such.  In fact, at
    Nandurbar, she declared that she was not even a primary member of the
    Congress, but she has entered the campaign since she was a part of the
    Congress family.  I believed her when she said she had come out into
    the open only to revive the Congress.
    
    Q: When exactly did you decide to revolt against her?
    A: When she drove down to the Rashtrapati Bhavan after the collapse of
    the Vajpayee government and informed President Narayanan that she, as
    distinct from the Congress, had the support of 272 MPs.  That was when
    her intention be-came very clear.  She wanted to become the Prime
    Minister of India even though she had lived a substantial portion of
    her life as a foreigner.  I was stunned and like me other Congress
    leaders were also stunned.  I was deeply worried be-cause the Congress
    would lose very heavily in the elections if it is going to project a
    foreigner as its Prime Ministerial candidate.
    
    Some of the Congress leaders who are now attacking me told me that
    they will not join a ministry led by a person of foreign origin.  All
    of us were worried as to how posterity will judge us for permitting a
    foreigner to become the Prime Minister of a large and great country
    like India.  It was then that myself and other likeminded people
    decided to boldly express our views.
    
    Q: But is it not because you want to become the Prime Minister of
    India that you are raising this issue?
    A: It is an absurd charge.  I am fighting for a principle.  We are
    witnessing a battle between a foreigner on the one hand and 100 crore
    self-respecting people on the other.  Having said this, I want to ask
    you is it a crime if I have the ambition to become the Prime
    Minister?  I have been in politics since 1958.  Over the past 40
    years, I have risen from the rank of a ordinary party worker to become
    a member of the Congress Working Committee.  I have 32 years of
    experience as an MLA and a Parliamentarian.  This being the case, is
    it a crime to nurture an ambition?  Every political worker has some
    ambition or the other.  If he is told not to have any ambition, then
    he will feel demoralised and the party will suffer.
    
    Q: You are forming a new political party and trying to network with
    other likeminded organisations.  In terms of political arithmetic,
    don't you think that you will effectively end up helping the Bharatiya
    Janata Party since you will be splitting anti-BJP votes?
    A: We have done our arithmetic.  The likeminded parties will assess
    their strength and weakness in each constituency and emerge victorious
    with a large number of MPs.  The national mood is definitely against
    the imposition of a foreigner on the country.
    
    Q: Will you return to the Congress if Sonia Gandhi declares that she
    is not interested in becoming the Prime Minister?
    A: She had earlier stated that she was not interested in power, but
    only in strengthening the Congress.  Then she became the party
    President, the chairperson of the CPP and recently she openly staked
    her claim to prime ministership.  I won't 'trust her if she says she
    is not keen on becoming the PM.
    



Back                          Top

«« Back
 
 
 
  Search Articles
 
  Special Annoucements