Hindu Vivek Kendra
A RESOURCE CENTER FOR THE PROMOTION OF HINDUTVA
   
 
 
«« Back
archive: 'Kashmir is not Kosovo'

'Kashmir is not Kosovo'

Sanjay Suri
Mid-Day
April 26, 1999


    Title: 'Kashmir is not Kosovo'
    Author: Sanjay Suri
    Publication: Mid-Day
    Date: April 26, 1999 
    
    The crisis in Kosovo is set to have long-term consequences for
    Kashmir: a debate in Britain's House of Lords early last week
    indicated that the West now wants to keep further away from Kashmir
    than ever before.
    
    Most members of the House of Lords seemed almost to recoil from the
    thought of any Kosovo-like intervention in Kashmir. They were
    responding to a debate opened by Lord Nazir Ahmed, an MP of Pakistani
    origin, who clearly sought renewed Western interest in Kashmir on the
    Kosovo model.
    
    It was not hereditary Lords who joined the debate; nor were most of
    them India or Pakistan 'hands.' To begin with the House of Lords
    almost emptied out in time for the debate. Lords have attended debates
    on Kosovo in strength, but most were not interested in Kashmir.
    
    Lord Evans made a straight connection with Kosovo. He quoted Prime
    Minister Tony Blair as saying about Kosovo: "This is a conflict we are
    fighting not for territory but for values, for a new internationalism
    where the brutal repression of whole ethnic groups will no longer be
    tolerated." He added: "What is right in the Balkans must surely he
    right in South Asia" and went on to speak about "ethnic cleansing" in
    Kashmir.
    
    The Earl of Dartmouth said the case for intervention was stronger for
    Kashmir "which, unlike Kosovo. is an area where Britain has both a
    moral responsibility and strong historic links". But most others -
    including Baroness Symons. who spoke for the Government - promptly
    smothered attempt at such a connection.
    
    Lord Swraj Paul, who is of Indian origin, said "goodwill is not often
    sustained by unsolicited involvement in the of friendly states." Lord
    Rea, who was part of the group that visited Pakistani Kashmir along
    with Lord Ahmed, said the Pakistani side gave their view of the
    conflict but that "we heard enough from other sources to learn that
    neither side can claim to be wholly innocent".
    
    Only Lord Clarke, Lord Evans and the Earl of Dartmouth spoke in
    support of the UN resolutions of 1948 and of a right for
    self-determination in Kashmir.
    
    In the face of this the government reply was telling. Baroness Symons
    acknowledged that there has been no resolution of the Kashmir dispute
    and that human rights violations continue. But she called for "an end
    to all external support for any violence in Kashmir". And she said it
    is "for India to determine its own legislation in the face of
    continuing violence from militant groups." This was a far cry from
    Western responses to Kosovo.
    
    The language of the debate was deeply revealing. Lord Ahmed's stated
    subject was support from Britain to "promote fresh international
    initiatives to alleviate the current state of tension between India
    and Pakistan." But he soon came to the point. He wanted an
    international war tribunal to investigate atrocities against the
    people of Kashmir. In ways polite and some-times less than polite,
    other Lords quickly nailed some of the inaccuracies inherent in Lord
    Ahmed's remarks.
    
    "Surely abuses of human rights are an international matter," said Lord
    Ahmed. He offered figures saying 65,000 had been killed in Kashmir and
    that the UN had, for example, recorded 4,551 violations of the Line of
    Control by the Indian army.
    
    Lord Avebury, who had for long supported        the Pakistani cause on
    Kashmir, countered saying that according        to Amnesty
    International the
    official toll was about 20,000, with perhaps three to four thousand
    deaths more than that occurring.
    
    He said no UN figures were available of the kind quoted by Lord Ahmed.
    "As the noble Lord pointed out, its (the UN's) are not made public."
    Lord Avebury said. Lord Ahmed had pointed out no such thing, and he
    did not defend his figures. The point Lord Avebury was making was not
    missed.
    



Back                          Top

«« Back
 
 
 
  Search Articles
 
  Special Annoucements