Hindu Vivek Kendra
A RESOURCE CENTER FOR THE PROMOTION OF HINDUTVA
   
 
 
«« Back
The great betrayal

The great betrayal

Author: Ram Gopal
Publication: BJP Today
Date: December 1-15, 2000
 
Congratulations for BJP TODAY's 16-31st October issue on Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, the great unifier of modern India.

In your editorial, you have expressed the view that the Congress behaviour towards Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel smacked of paranoia, even after your academic friend had explained to you that the Congress behaviour was not psychological but was real politic.  I must say that your friend was absolutely correct.  There is no disputing the fact that Gandhi's greater obsession was Hindu-Muslim unity, not independence, for which he was prepared to make any sacrifice on behalf of Hindus.  You must also recall that Jawaharlal Nehru was opposed to each and every principle of Gandhi.  Summing up his differences with Nehru, even Gandhi once said," Jawahar wants Englishmen to go but Angreziat (English ways and culture) to stay; I want Angreziat to go and Englishmen to stay as our friends".  (Durga Das, 'India from Curzon to Nehru and after', p.261, Rupa Paperback, 1977).  Indeed, Nehru was an Englishman in Indian skin.  His socialist leanings were well known to Gandhi.  In Muslim appeasement his closest friend was Maulana Abul Kalam Azad, an orthodox Muslim.  Sardar Patel, on the other hand, followed Gandhi in all respects, but took a pragmatic approach on the Hindu-Muslim question.' He sometimes used to say, "There is only one nationalist Muslim in the Congress and he is Jawaharlal Nehru." It was the Sardar who, in a public meeting at Lucknow on 6th January 1948, said: "It should not surprise Muslims if doubts were entertained about their loyalty.  They could not ride on two horses.  Those who were disloyal could not remain in India for the atmosphere would become too hot for them."

Thus, obsessed with Hindu-Muslim unity, Gandhiji had a logic in sacrificing Sardar Patel to make Jawaharlal Nehru the first Prime Minister of India, even while realizing that Patel was far more capable.  The disastrous effect of this unethical act of Gandhi is being realised by the Indian intelligentsia only now when it is too late.  Having come to power, it was a political necessity for Nehru to sideline and even eliminate Sardar Patel's memory, along with his supporters, like P.D.Tandon, K.M.Munshi and Dr.  Rajendra Prasad.  Gandhi's assassination on 30th January 1948 provided him a golden opportunity to brow-beat Patel.  Nehru's socialist brigade did every thing to tarnish the image of Sardar by accusing him of having a hand in Gandhi's murder.

The story of denial of Prime Ministership to Sardar Patel on page 5 of the issue based on Rajmohan Gandhi's book is a crude attempt to white-wash Gandhi's sin of June 1946 to oust the Sardar and let Jawaharlal Nehru become the Congress president to be called by the Viceroy to form the government at the centre.  The famous journalist and political analyst of the time, Durga Das, who had close relations with all the political leaders has given the correct account in his book cited above.  He says : "Patel was the head of the Congress Parliamentary Board and the provincial Congress committees had expressed their preference for him as Azad's successor.  But Gandhi felt Nehru would be a better instrument to deal with Englishmen, as they would talk in a common idiom.  Many years later, I sought Kriplani's explanation of Gandhi's preference for Nehru as against Patel.

He said that like all saints and holy people Gandhi wanted significant men amongst his adherents.  Insofar as Jawaharlal Nehru's election was concerned, Kriplani added that all P.C.C.s sent in the name of Patel by a majority and one or two proposed the names of Rajen Babu in addition, but none that of Jawaharlal.  I knew Gandhi wanted Jawaharlal to be President for a year, and I made a proposal myself saying some Delhi fellows want Jawaharlal's name.  I circulated it to the members of the working committee to get their endorsements played this mischief and I am to blame."(India from Curzon to Nehru.  Pg229-230).

On 12th August 1946, when the Viceroy Lord Wavell decided to invite the Congress president to form a provisional government, most of the CWC members felt that it should be Patel because he was best suited to deal with an opponent like Jinnah.  Durga Das states: " I asked Gandhi for his reaction to this feeling among a majority of the working committee members.  He readily agreed that Patel would have proved a better negotiator and organiser as Congress president, but he felt Nehru should head the government.  When I asked him how he reconciled this with his assessment of Patel's as a leader, he laughed and said -Jawahar is the only Englishman in my camp-and seeing that he had aroused my curiosity further , he added Jawahar will not take the second place.  He is better known abroad than Sardar and will make India play a role in international affairs.  Sardar will look after the country's affairs.  They will be like two oxen yoked to the government cart."
 


Back                          Top

«« Back
 
 
 
  Search Articles
 
  Special Annoucements