Hindu Vivek Kendra
A RESOURCE CENTER FOR THE PROMOTION OF HINDUTVA
   
 
 
«« Back
Collaborating on issuing denials

Collaborating on issuing denials

Author: M K Dhar
Publication: The Pioneer
Date: December 7, 2000

Washington assumes too much by asserting that China will honour its commitment not to supply nuclear capable missiles or components in future.  China is committed now to further improve and reinforce its export control system covering ban on dual use items under its missile non-proliferation policy.

It is after years of protests by India against transfer of nuclear capable missiles by Beijing to Islamabad, that the US has finally waived all sanctions in exchange for assurances of good behaviour in future.  State Department spokesman Richard Boucher wants India to welcome the comprehensive and explicit assurance from China that no such cooperation with Pakistan will take place in future.

The assurance came on the eve of the recent Asia-Pacific Economic Conference, presumably as trade-off by promising not to continue as a missile proliferator, in order to frustrate the US Theatre Missile Defence System (TDM) proposed for Asia-Pacific for China's strategic encirclement.  India has little interest in deals between two nuclear powers, but China's participation in Pakistan's emergence as a nuclear and missile power in the region has endangered India's security.  Washington's attempt to whitewash the guilt does not certainly please India, which is being sermonised to close its missile options.

China has enabled Pakistan to reach a stage technologically where it can manufacture its own ballistic missiles capable of carrying nuclear warheads to "all Indian cities".  A Foreign Ministry spokesman in Islamabad confirmed this while stating that China's assurances to the US would not affect Pakistan's indigenous missile programme since it was already in possession of minimum nuclear deference based on missiles and aircraft.  Pakistan's entire programme is Chinese-driven and Beijing has never been looking for commercial gains in such transactions made at special "friendship prices" but in the interest of strategic partnership against India.  Otherwise, such massive arms and nuclear materials transfers, Beijing's denials notwithstanding, makes little sense.

China has never admitted its collaboration with Pakistan in the strategic area, increasing Islamabad's belligerence and lawless behaviour towards India.  There has been a profusion of denials about supply of fissile materials, uranium enrichment plant components, weapon designs and related technology, plutonium processing facility, and missile supply in violation of its commitments as a NPT signatory.  Going by past experience, denials will continue to be made as expected of the ongoing Sino-Pak collaboration.

For strategic reasons, Washington has resolutely turned a blind eye to irrefutable findings by intelligence agencies about the transfer of nuclear components and M-11 and other missiles from China to Pakistan.  As a consequence, frustrated intelligence officers have begun to leak information to the US media, forcing the administration to react.  As Gary Milholin of the Nuclear Arms Control Centre points out, the intelligence agencies are "tired of sending over all the information and having it ignored by the US Administration.  They would like to think that the work they do has some kind of impact".  Even a Congressional Commission on Missile Tests confirmed that Pakistan's missile infrastructure "has developed quite rapidly with technical help from China and North Korea".  From where North Korea acquired such capability is also a question for Washington to answer.  It is well-known that China has set up a ballistic missile production plant in Kala Chata mountain range near Fatejung, 40 km from Islamabad, called the National Defence Complex.  Islamabad still officially denies the existence of any such factory and Beijing, as usual, denies any collaboration.  Pakistan has also acquired some fully assembled missiles from North Korea.

Pakistan could not have acquired so much enriched uranium as to build 50 to 60 nuclear weapons without active help from China and without stealing technology from the Netherlands and Germany.  Apart from supply of ring magnets and other components for its Kahuta uranium enrichment plant, China has set up the 300 mw Chashma uranium enrichment plant.  The supplies include stabilisers and streamers and also large quantities of heavy water.

Pakistan is now taking two routes to the nuclear weapons programme, one based on uranium and the other on plutonium.  The facility for extracting fissile material from the Chashma plant exists on the left bank of the Indus river, 170 km from Islamabad in Mianwali district.  The Clinton Administration's efforts to dissuade China and other countries from getting involved in the Khushab project did not succeed.  For quite some time the existence of the plant was denied.  But former premier Benazir Bhutto candidly admitted later that the Khushab project was "tied to our nuclear plant from China".

In spite of the fact that Pakistan remains steadfast in its commitment to support terrorist Osama bin Laden, who is mounting Islamist expeditions to China's Xinjiang province also Beijing is strong in its commitment to Islambad, a "special friend".  The argument that China needs a long period of peace for its economic development does not match its action on the ground, of increasing tension in the subcontinent.
 


Back                          Top

«« Back
 
 
 
  Search Articles
 
  Special Annoucements