Hindu Vivek Kendra
A RESOURCE CENTER FOR THE PROMOTION OF HINDUTVA
   
 
 
«« Back
'Delayed verdict led to Babri demolition'

'Delayed verdict led to Babri demolition'

Author:
Publication: Hindustan Times, New Delhi
Date: May 16, 2001
 
Home Minister L K Advani today said that Narasimha Rao government's refusal' to request the Allahabad High Court to give an early verdict on land acquisition case was a 'signal' to delay the judgements which resulted in public anger leading to demolition of the disputed structure.

Deposing before the Liberhan Ayodhya Commission of Inquiry, he said he did not think the analysis that the Centre's signals to the Allahabad HC to delay the judgement "is factually wrong".

He said, Throughout the month of November 1992 from our side we had been making direct approaches to the High Court for an early verdict as the arguments have been complete for over a month.

"Vajpayee and I met the Prime Minister (P V Narasimha Rao) and we urged him to request the High Court to give an early verdict. After all, it was entirely up to the High Court to time its verdict," he said.

Advani added, "The government, like any other authority, could request it. When it is publicly known that the government has conveyed to Vajpayee, Advani and others that the government is not going to make even a request for an early verdict what is the message conveyed to the judiciary, except what I said in the statement."

Advani blamed the Centre for not taking any step to urge the HC to deliver an early judgement and added, "If the High Court had pronounced its verdict on its own before December 6 in response to our requests, the demolition wouldn't have occurred.'

The Home Minister, recalling what RSS leader Prof. Rajendra Singh told him, said Singh met Rao on December 3 and "urged him again to request the Allahabad High Court for an early verdict" as "RSS itself had certain doubts whether they would be able to keep all these lakhs (of karsevaks) under control".

Singh told Rao that if the judgement was delivered, irrespective of whether it upheld or rejected the Uttar Pradesh Government's notification acquiring 2.77 acres of land adjacent to the disputed structure, it would help diffuse the situation.

When Singh told the then PM that he feared that there would be untoward incidents during the "symbolic karseva" on December 6, 1992, Rao had replied that he was confident that with leaders like Singh around everything would remain in control.

According to Advani, had the verdict been against the state government, the physical kar seva could have started on the land belonging to the Nyas committee and had it been upheld the same could have been started on it.

The BJP leader said the then government was conscious that certain aspects of the Ayodhya controversy could not be resolved through the judiciary, but avoided a solution by saying "let us wait for the court orders'. PTI
 


Back                          Top

«« Back
 
 
 
  Search Articles
 
  Special Annoucements