Hindu Vivek Kendra
A RESOURCE CENTER FOR THE PROMOTION OF HINDUTVA
   
 
 
«« Back
In defence of the Defence Minister

In defence of the Defence Minister

Author: RV Pandit
Publication: The Hindustan Times
Date: February 10, 2002

Ever since my booklet, "The Whole Truth with Documents, about the Aluminium Caskets Bought by the Defence Ministry in 1999-2000", landed in the mail boxes of editors and MPs two weeks ago, many recipients are wondering what George Fernandes is up to.

"Mr Pandit, could you please write for us about the coffins booklet. Fernandes has sent us a copy and suggested that we so something," a caller from a newspaper pleads.

I have seen letter Fernandes has sent. He draws attention to the truth this writer has documented in the booklet, and asks how the Press reconciles this truth with what it had published on December 11/12, 2001.

"The Press was irresponsible in publishing what it wrote then, and if you now believe what I have written to be the truth, then make amends. The Press is unfair to Fernandes," I told the journalist. "But that's why we want you to write," the caller persists. "Write why you wrote the booklet," he urged. That got me.

We are a strange people. Hardly anybody has asked where the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) has fibbed, how the Press has lied, why the Opposition has enlarged those lies about the purchase of caskets for the Army. But Somnath Chatterjee wants to know why I wrote the booklet.

My credentials as a crusader against corruption have been recognised by no less than the Supreme Court. I've been quoted over two pages in the Common Cause vs Union of India case (April 4, 1996) on corruption.

Jaipal Reddy wants to know how secret and confidential documents were given to me by the Ministry of Defence when just a glance at the documents produced in the booklet will convince anyone that these do not deserve even a 'restricted' label.

The real story

I will answer all these questions. During the Kargil War, I was involved in the very successful 'Rogue Army Out' advertising campaign for the US and Europe and, in the process, visited the Palam base in New Delhi where bodies of martyred troops were being brought from the front.

Wooden coffins, bodies stuffed inside, national flag draped around. Guards. Ceremony. Lots of media. Fine. But some coffins were emitting odour, some had body fluids trickling out. "India is primitive in handling the war dead, hypocritical in this show of respect," I reckoned. In this background, when I read The Times of India report titled "Money was made even from Kargil coffins, says CAG" on December 11, 2001, I knew instantly that this was not true - there were no aluminium caskets during or even immediately after the Kargil War. The Times of India report itself acknowledged that the first batch arrived in March 2001!

Not unnaturally, I followed up by obtaining a copy of the CAG Review. What I read made me decide, then and there, that I must expose the CAG and The Times of India.

I am not new to taking on the mighty. At a time when most people would not even dare to criticise Jawaharlal Nehru, I took on his favoured Finance Minister TT Krishnamachari, for lying on the Mundhra scam. I published an expose, 'Lies of TTK', authored by AD Gorwala, from my home address since no publisher would touch the booklet.

I stalled his re-induction for some time at least by republishing the pamphlet when Nehru wanted him back.

Somnath Chatterjee says Fernandes has "sponsored" the booklet. He can have a look at my accounts. Incidentally, I have also contributed to Chatterjee's party, by cheque.

My investigation

The question as to how I obtained the documents from the Ministry of Defence as also why the Minister gave the documents to me needs to be answered. I asked to see non-classified documents only. No problem, I was told. The documents had already been made available to journalists who had asked for them.

On why the Minister agreed to give the documents to me, it is obvious he my potential in lifting the shadow the media and the Opposition had unreasonably sought to cast on his reputation. Also, I had a credible background. I have no doubt the Minister would have given the same cooperation that he extended me to any other enterprising and persistent enquirer.

Some have asked how I managed to get a sample of the imported caskets for display at my press conference on January 24, 2001. Simple. I asked for it. Of course, there was bureaucratic dilly-dallying. But I am persuasive. Also, I can interpret and argue Constitutional provisions well.

The Press and the politicians always appear so eager to expose the wrong, the corrupt. Good. But why do the two shy away from making amends when when it is found that their allegations are unfounded?

George Fernandes is my friend. I am proud of the way he is fighting to protect his reputation. Everything about George is unique, giant size.

His response to his detractors in Parliament is massive - a personal letter to all the Members of Parliament and opinion makers, with copies of the booklet. Who paid for the copies? This writer did.

My booklet has sharply criticised the CAG for a shoddy job, and the Press, particularly newspapers of The Times of India group, for their irresponsibility. Yet the CAG is silent. The Times group is mum. And the Communist Party of India (Marxist) and the Congress have taken up cudgels on their behalf.

Shouldn't they be held accountable? Do the Press and the politicians want the word 'sorry' to be obliterated from the vocabulary of India?

Incidentally, the Coffins controversy has nothing to do with coffins. Nowhere is the word coffin used in the CAG Review - the source document of the agitated. Fernandes could still bury his critics on this count alone.

(The author is a freelance journalist)
 


Back                          Top

«« Back
 
 
 
  Search Articles
 
  Special Annoucements