Hindu Vivek Kendra
A RESOURCE CENTER FOR THE PROMOTION OF HINDUTVA
   
 
 
«« Back
Islam's many children

Islam's many children

Author: Saeed Naqvi
Publication: The Indian Express
Date: June 21, 2002

A salam to Kalam for demolishing the stereotype
 
Heaven knows a lot could have been said about Dr A.P.J. Abdul  Kalam's elevation to the Rashtrapati Bhavan, but considering that he  is almost our president, deference to the office dictates that we set  aside such observations that he may be some sort of an Islamic  hippie.

Even reservations on his hairstyle can be held back. In fact, the  great bonus one can extract from his elevation is this: his persona  will go a considerable distance in demolishing stereotypes about  Muslims on the subcontinent. In popular perception, the Muslim is an  Urdu-speaking qasai or a butcher - as opposed to a Punjabi-speaking  jhatka meat seller - dangerously prone to misusing the weapons of his  trade; marries several times; multiplies like a rabbit and bathes  only on Fridays because he is unclean in direct proportion to his  distance from Brahminism.
 
The other image is of an Urdu-spewing, paan-chewing, hubble-bubble  smoking, decadent nawab, leaning against a brocade sausage cushion,  listening to B-grade Urdu poetry with a mujra dancer in attendance.

In recent years a third stereotype has swum into our ken. He is  bearded, wears a skull cap, his pyjamas is pulled above the ankles  and his outsized shirt almost touching them. He breeds in madrassas  where he plots against the state.

These indigenous stereotypes have been reinforced globally by the  much more powerful paraphernalia at the disposal of the international  media obsessed with the Muslim image ever since the Palestinian- Israeli issue dominated western consciousness - a trend that has been  aided greatly by the events of September 11.

There are those frightful clips, inserted repeatedly, ad nauseam, of  armed Muslim militants doing the drill in obscure forests, or Muslims  bowing down in prayer in perfect unison, like some Stalinist drill,  in huge intimidating numbers. This stereotype of the global Muslim  umma on the march, as projected by the media, brings into the blazing  spotlight the third Indian category mentioned above, the so-called  madrassa variety.

In this maze of exaggerations, caricatures, stereotypes, where is the  real Indian Muslim? Well, this question is flawed once again because  it presupposes a monolithic Muslim presence lurking somewhere behind  the stereotypes.

It is in this context that the A.J.P Abdul Kalam phenomenon, and its  potential to demolish some some universal as well as Indian  distortions, must be viewed.

An Indian Muslim from Rameswaram at the southern tip of the country,  is as different ethnically, culturally, linguistically, and  civilisationally from his Kashmiri brethren as, say, Indonesian  Muslims are distinct from Iranians.

The Iranian civilisation, its Shia content refined during the Sefavid  period, nevertheless retained some of its pre-Islamic Zoroastrian  traditions like Nau-roz. In Indonesia, the entire Islamic practice is  an overlay on very durable Hindu motifs.

While we know that the Mousetrap has been playing at London's Westend  for 40 years, we are lamentably short on knowledge about the Ramayana  ballet, performance by 150 namaz-saying Muslims under the shadow of  Yog Jakarta's magnificent temples for the past 27 years without a  break.

Have you ever perceived this exquisite elasticity in Islamic practice  in the current projection of Islam worldwide?

We have grown so accustomed to the cliche, the broad-brush  generalisation, that the sudden emergence of a veena-playing,  Bhagawat Gita-reciting, Rameswaram-born A.P.J Abdul Kalam strikes us  as an unreal happening, something at total variance with the images  we have been bombarded with, ranging from Osama bin Laden to Ahmad  Bukhari.

The Indian Muslim, like any other Indian, is a creature of his  village, district, state, in very possible way - language, lifestyle,  dress, food, above all, the indigenous culture of comedy, joke-making  and satire.

The late Mohammad Koya of the Muslim League in Kerala, invited me  once for dinner when he became chief minister for a few weeks. He  knew no Urdu or English and I was totally ignorant of Malayalam of  which he was the best speaker in the Assembly - in fact, he was so  funny, he would keep his audiences in stitches.

At the end of the meal, Koya produced seven different varieties of  bananas by way of dessert, even as I looked on, agape. Here was a  civilisational clash between two Indian Muslims that Huntington would  have to work hard to decipher.

In fact, within districts there are Muslims and Muslims. For  instance, the Labbais or the Tamil-speaking Muslims who settled in  Kanyakumari, Tirunelveli and Ramanathanpuram, are today among the  more prosperous in the state, controlling the leather industry, hotel  chains and the dubious blackmarket in Southeast Asia.

In days of dollar control in the past, it was a Kilakrai Muslim who  facilitated hawala transactions in the south. Every southern  politician knows this.

Abdul Kalam, being from Rameshwaram, clearly came more under the  spell of Saraswati unlike the other Labbais, who remained primarily  in the domain of Lakshmi. Too much should not be made of his  Rameswarm connection. After all, you do know the most prominent  citizen of the holy city of Varanasi, don't you? Ustad Bismillah  Khan, of course.

As for Kalam's familiarity with Hindu scriptures, was not Justice  Ismail in Chennai the country's leading authority on the Kambar  Ramayanam? And Kalam, for all his devotion to Rama, still has to  catch up with Abdul Rahim Khan-e-Khana's verses in Sanskrit dedicated  to Dasrath's son.

Yes, Kalam knows no Urdu. But then Muslims in Tamil Nadu, Kerala,  Karnataka have written literature in the local languages just as Kazi  Nazrul Islam wrote powerful revolutionary poetry, replete with images  of Kali, in incomparable Bengali.

Salbeg did likewise in Oriya, and so on. The list of non-Urdu giants  in literature from among the Muslims is unfortunately not part of the  popular perception in the Hindi-Urdu belt.

Abdul Kalam is part of a continuing tradition which exists but about  which we have developed an amnesia because of the obsession of the  global media - and that of our own - with painting the Muslim in a  monochromatic shade.
 


Back                          Top

«« Back
 
 
 
  Search Articles
 
  Special Annoucements