Hindu Vivek Kendra
A RESOURCE CENTER FOR THE PROMOTION OF HINDUTVA
   
 
 
«« Back
Vishwesha Tirtha disagrees with Kanchi Acharya

Vishwesha Tirtha disagrees with Kanchi Acharya

Author: Our Staff Correspondent
Publication: The Hindu
Date: June 22, 2003
URL: http://www.hinduonnet.com/thehindu/2003/06/22/stories/2003062203200600.htm

One of the leading lights of the Ramajanmabhoomi movement, Sri Vishwesha Tirtha Swami of Pejawar Math says he disagrees with the statement of Kanchi Sankaracharya, Sri Jayendra Saraswati, that there were only three parties to the Ayodhya dispute- the Sankaracharya himself, Muslim organisations, and the Union Government.

The swami told presspersons here today that the Ramajanmabhoomi at Ayodhya belonged to the followers of Ramanuja's tradition. Before taking any decision, the "peethadhipathis'' of Ramanuja tradition, the "mathadipathis'' of Vaishnava tradition, other Sankaracharyas, the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP), and other sants must be taken into confidence.

It was not right on the part of the Union Government to take a decision just by roping in the Kanchi Sankaracharya. This would not go down well with the Hindus and would again lead to confrontation, he added.

The Centre should try to evolve a consensus by getting all the religious leaders of Hindu and Muslim communities and the VHP. If this was not possible, it should bring in a Bill to resolve the Ramajanmabhoomi issue either in this Lok Sabha or the next one.

All the political parties should make Ramajanmabhoomi an important issue in the next elections. The only way out was either through consensus or by brining in a law. This problem could not be solved quickly through the courts.

The Swami said that if the dispute went on for long, it would become a constant source of disharmony. It could be resolved through elections as it was the real instrument of democracy. The mutually contradictory statements of the Kanchi Acharya, the VHP, and the Muslim organisations had created a sensitive situation.

The swami said that while he had nothing against a solution by the Kanchi Acharya, all the others should be consulted. The Kanchi seer had not consulted him before sending the proposal to the Muslim Personal Law Board.

The VHP had begun the struggle for Ramajanmabhoomi and it was there throughout. Hence it should be included in evolving any solution. He would meet the Congress president, Sonia Gandhi, in New Delhi on July 11 and seek her support for a Bill to resolve the issue.

On the strained relations in the Sangh Parivar, Sri Vishwesha Tirtha said that he as a member of the VHP Margadarshak Mandal would guide the VHP in its relations with others including the BJP during a meeting on July 11 in New Delhi.

The RSS chief, K.S. Sudharshan, and the sants would be attending the meeting. There were reports of pressure being brought upon the Centre by Muslim historians on the archaeological findings at Ayodhya. There were also contradictory reports on the archaeological findings at the Ramajanmabhoomi site, the Swami said.
 


Back                          Top

«« Back
 
 
 
  Search Articles
 
  Special Annoucements