|
|
«« Back |
|
Is the real threat Islamic radicalism or Islamic liberalism?
Is the real threat Islamic radicalism
or Islamic liberalism?
Author: Lee Jay Walker Dip BA MA
Publication: Faith Freedom International
Date:
URL: http://www.faithfreedom.org/oped/LJWalker30813.htm
It is often perceived that Islamic
radicalism is the real threat and not Islamic liberalism, yet how true
is this? For history teaches that Islam not only conquered by the sword,
but also via liberals who preached a different Islam in order to convert
the masses. Yet irrespective if former nations were either conquered by
the sword, or via Sufi mystics or liberal versions of Islam, the outcome
was normally the same and this applies to gradual Islamization of society
which eventually leads to Islamic conservatism and oppression.
Today the sword of Islam is still
forcing non-Muslims to convert in nations like Sudan and Indonesia, and
in Sudan many African Christians and Animists are still being sold into
slavery. Yet in the West, and the world in general, it is clear that Islamization
must apply to two simple strategies, and this applies to massive Islamic
migration and having large families; whilst the second strategy applies
to Islamic liberalism, and this applies to manipulating world leaders and
institutions.
For example in the United Kingdom
the current Prime Minister, Tony Blair, often praises the beauty of Islam
and that he often reads the Koran. And similar major figures like Prince
Charles glorify Islam and he supports Islamic organizations in the United
Kingdom. At the same time the mass media ignores major issues like forced
conversion, Islamic Sharia Law which discriminates against both women and
non-Muslims; and nations like Saudi Arabia who kill all male converts to
any other faith are free to spread their propaganda and build Islamic institutions
throughout the West.
At the same time Islamic leaders
at major institutions are spreading a liberal version of Islam and if you
didn't know about the "real" Mohammed, you would believe that Mohammed
was gentle, loved humanity, treated women with respect and that he was
a forerunner of global human rights. Yet the "real" Mohammed made it clear
that the enslavement of non-Muslims and war was justifiable in order to
spread Islam. Mohammed also made it clear that male Islamic apostates must
be killed and he made sure that non-Muslims were inferior in law and had
to pay extra taxes.
Therefore, while Islamic militants
are a threat with regards to Islamic terrorism and persecuting non-Muslims
in nations like Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan and countless other
mainly Islamic nations; this does not apply to the whole picture. For in
Western Europe, North America, East Asia, and other parts of the world,
Islam can not conquer by the sword, yet the message of Islam and Islamization
can take place via mass migration and liberal Muslims spreading an enlightened
version of Islam, which does not apply in the real "Islamic world."
Given this, the real threat of
Islamization is not via people like Osama Bin Laden, but the university
lecturer who is spreading liberal Islam and Western liberals like Karen
Armstrong who are teaching an alternative history of Islam and the teachings
of Mohammed. For the spread of Islam is growing in nations like the United
Kingdom and at least 50,000 people have converted to Islam. Yet why did
they convert? Was it because of people like Osama Bin Laden or because
of people like Karen Armstrong and Islamic liberals?
It is also baffling that religious
leaders in the West are also quiet about the threat of Islam or the persecution
of non-Muslims in mainly Islamic nations. And when brave religious leaders
rebuke Islam, Sharia Law and the Hadiths, they in turn become rebuked by
their own co- religionists, why? For surely religious leaders have a duty
to tell the truth and to warn their co-religionists about Islamic persecution
in mainly Muslim nations. However, their silence is helping Islam to grow
and would 50,000 British nationals convert to Islam if they knew that Mohammed
had slaves, had sex with a child, killed Jews and Pagans, raped a Jewish
lady and had countless wives and concubines?
The irony is that Osama Bin Laden
is a "real" Muslim who follows the teachings of Islam; and even if you
hate this person, he at least follows his convictions which have been installed
into him from reading the Koran, Hadiths and Sharia Law. Yet Islamic liberals,
like Sufi teachers, are hypocrites and they are the real threat. For once
the liberal period of Islam manages to Islamize society, then only one
conclusion will happen, and this applies to a future society being backward
and based on Sharia Islamic Law.
In the past the Islamization of
many nations took place slowly and Sufi leaders talked about the love of
God, yet this love of God in time became replaced by conservative Islam
and non-Muslims were subdued to either being a small minority, or in the
case of Buddhism in Afghanistan, then being wiped from the face of Afghanistan.
Given this, then who is the real threat, is it Osama Bin Laden or Islamic
liberals who are re-writing Islam?
jayaoun@hotmail.com
Back
Top |
|
«« Back |
|
|
|
|
|