Hindu Vivek Kendra
A RESOURCE CENTER FOR THE PROMOTION OF HINDUTVA
   
 
 
«« Back
'India went to UN due to aggression'

'India went to UN due to aggression'

Author: PTI
Publication: Daily Excelsior
Date: November 22, 2003
URL: http://www.dailyexcelsior.com/web1/03nov22/news.htm#7

Rejecting Pakistan's demand that UN resolutions be implemented in Jammu and Kashmir, India has said it first went to the world body not because the State was a disputed territory but because of Pakistani aggression.

In an interview to a private Pakistani TV channel broadcast today, External Affairs Minister Yashwant Sinha said "you are right in saying that it was India which took the question of Pakistan aggression on Jammu and Kashmir to UN. You are also right in saying that we suggested that there should be a plebiscite."

Kashmir had acceded legally to India and "after that we went to UN, not because Kashmir is a disputed territory, but to protest the aggression by Pakistan," Sinha told Geo TV.

"At that time Pakistan had not agreed to the condition that it should withdraw it forces. These talks went for several years but the issue was not resolved."

Sinha said in view of this India believed Simla agreement constituted the basis for settlement of Kashmri issue.

"Simla agreement says representatives of both the countries will meet to find a final solution to Jammu and Kashmir. This outlines the process for final settlement," he said, adding Pakistan neglects the agreement and speaks only of UN resolutions.

Asked about Pakistan's demand, in response to India's latest peace gesture, that UN documents be used by passengers travelling in the proposed Srinagar- Muzzafarabad bus, Sinha shot back, "Pakistan-based Kashmiris travel between India and Pakistan as well as abroad with documents issued by Pakistan. Some of them are coming to India and some going abroad. Where does the UN come in between?"

Denying that there were any proposal to formalise the Line of Control as border between the two countries, Sinha said India's official stand was that Pakistan should give up its right on Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK).

"Therefore there is no dispute on that. If there is problem it is Pak-occupied Kashmir," he said.

Sinha said Kashmir had undergone a great deal of change after UN resolutions as Pakistan had given 5200 sq km of territory in Kashmir to China.

Besides, Pakistan President Pervez Musharraf himself said over two lakh families of soldiers had been settled in PoK. "Has it not changed the demography of Kashmir. Which Kashmir are they talking about. Can we go back to the situation as it prevailed in 1949?" Sinha asked.

"I want to tell you with confidence that this cross border terrorism is not going to last long. It will now be difficult to continue with infiltration," he said.

Sinha said Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee would visit Islamabad for the SAARC summit in January but would not meet Pakistani leaders.

"We said it clearly that we will hold summit-level meeting at that (high) time when all the preparations were made from the `bottom level' as direct summits failed to yield results," Sinha said.
 


Back                          Top

«« Back
 
 
 
  Search Articles
 
  Special Annoucements