Author: Editorial
Publication: The Indian Express
Date: December 24, 2003
URL: http://www.indianexpress.com/archive_full_story.php?content_id=37860
Introduction: America cannot continue
to downplay Pakistan's role in nuclear proliferation
The political father of Pakistan's
nuclear programme, Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, gave the game away on day one when
he dubbed its nuclear weapon as the "Islamic bomb". Evidence of Pakistani
nuclear proliferation in Iran and Libya suggests someone in Pakistan took
Bhutto's vision seriously. There could well be a Saudi connection as well
to this entire project. Long time friends and "allies" doing the unthinkable?
Billions of dollars of aid going to a country that is proliferating into
dangerous territory? Is this some B-grade Hollywood thriller or what?
No news report about nuclear proliferation
in Asia can really be news to US policy makers who have been repeatedly
warned by their own intelligence agencies about a proliferation nexus between
Pakistan, North Korea and other countries, perhaps including China, Iran,
Iraq, Saudi Arabia and Libya. There is adequate, convincing and now mounting
evidence of Pakistan's links with both "rogue" states from the so-called
"axis of evil" category and more respectable nations in search of nuclear
deterrence. As Pakistan's most munificent benefactor at present, the US
must reconsider the level of its commitment to a regime clearly engaged
in a long-term game of hurting US's strategic interests in the region.
On the one hand, India was lectured sanctimoniously and punished with sanctions
for always saying it had a nuclear programme and never denying its intention
to go nuclear if the world refused to concede universal disarmament, it
has never been adequately lauded or rewarded for steadfastly refusing to
proliferate. On the other hand, Pakistan has been rewarded economically
and politically for ostensible cooperation in the "war against terrorism"
with inadequate pressure being exerted in the direction of democratising
Pakistan and reducing the power of the military. The so-called "nuclear
powers", the veto powers in the UN Security Council, have also done little
to expose the nuclear proliferation activity of China, Pakistan and North
Korea.
What is more troubling about Pakistan's
nuclear programme is that it is almost entirely under military control
and even within the military in the charge of a select few. Perhaps none
of Pakistan's democratically elected leaders has ever been fully briefed
about its nuclear programme and capability. It may not any longer be a
wild idea to suggest that the US must secure control of Pakistan's nuclear
programme. With US troops based in Pakistan and given the economic clout
that it has acquired through financial aid, it is best placed to exercise
restraint on Pakistan's nuclear programme and proliferation agenda. US
analysts routinely refer to the India-Pakistan border as a nuclear "flashpoint".
The exposure of Pakistan's proliferation activity should show clearly where
lies the real threat.