Hindu Vivek Kendra
A RESOURCE CENTER FOR THE PROMOTION OF HINDUTVA
   
 
 
«« Back
UPA anarchy in Congress diarchy

UPA anarchy in Congress diarchy

Author: R. Balashankar
Publication: Orgnaniser
Date: September 12, 2004
URL: http://www.organiser.org/dynamic/modules.php?name=Content&pa=showpage&pid=40&page=2

If the first 100 days of the Manmohan Singh government hit headlines only for the wrong reasons, the Congress has only itself to blame. Its other partners in the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) of course, only worsened the situation.

The communist predicament is understandable. It is no secret that they are not happy with the government and its policies, and are sustaining it only to keep the BJP out of power.

They also know that the parliamentary presence they have achieved this time is the highest ever, and to keep the same level in any future election is not easy. And practically three states and one department in the Central Government are under their total control. The removal of A.K. Antony from chief ministership in Kerala was at the behest of the communists.

This is the first Congress experiment in diarchy, with the powers vested in the party chief and the Prime Minister acting as her dummy. Remember the pathological Congress hatred for anybody else other than the Prime Minister holding the post of the party chief? Even the allegedly democratic Jawaharlal Nehru could not tolerate this. But now, Dr Singh has to tolerate it, rather, Sonia Gandhi is allowing him to represent her.

All these days, the only area in which the Prime Minister has expressed his definite opinions is on the Indian Administrative Service. He has, fortunately, a clear idea as to how the personnel are to be selected, trained and their tenure fixed to boot. He also asked his secretaries not to use abbreviations (often to mislead) in the official notes, particularly concerning the economic ministries. So far so good.

Another area of his concern was the disruption of Parliament by the Opposition. That serious debates could not take place in Parliament because of Opposition belligerence is only part of the truth. The Parliament debate is more a casualty of the committee system, introduced when Shivraj Patel was Lok Sabha Speaker. Every ministry traditionally has a consultative committee. Along with this, the Standing Committees have taken away all the charm of the parliamentary debate from the citizen's point of view. There is a scramble for positions in the Standing Committees, which are semi-ministries, and their chairmen, demi-ministers.

All important dealings are made in these committees, and often they are headed by persons, the subject of which is not their forte. Here it is convenient for the government to manipulate the Opposition.

That is why we do not hear any debate on economic issues either in Parliament or in the media. Ever since we introduced the capitalist system of economic management, the line of divide has become really narrow.

So the visible faces of the Manmohan Singh government are confined to a Mani Shankar Aiyar, E. Ahmed, Taslimuddin, Arjun Singh and Lalu Yadav. These ministers provide comic relief even as they extract their political price. Lalu and his sixer team provide both sound and muscle power to the UPA. Competing with them is Mani Shankar, who graduated from speech-writer to speaker.

Every time he wrote a speech (he was the principal speech writer for Rajiv Gandhi), the latter had to eat the crow. Those in the know say that the famous statements-'Kolkata is a dying city' when Rajiv was making a last-ditch effort to oust Marxists in West Bengal, 'don't trust people who wear black glasses', that when Congress was making a comeback effort in Tamil Nadu, and 'Nani yaad dilayenge' when he was fighting his back-to-the-wall battle against V.P. Singh-all originated in the fertile pen of Mani Shankar. Every time, his mentor paid heavily for the Mani foot-in-the- mouth therapy. Only the ensuing Maharashtra election results will tell us how Mani has served the new master, with his big-mouthed Savarkar tirade.

Antony, because of his clean image and stern stand against minority communalism, was for long a red rag to the CPM in Kerala. Equally, he earned the wrath of the Muslim League and of a section of the Christian clergy. For, Antony had warned of a Hindu backlash four years ago, if the minority communities continued to corner political and economic power in their hands, using their communal clout. Ever since, Antony was despised at all communal congregations, and a vilification campaign was launched against him. Even former Congress Chief Minister, K. Karunakaran and his son Muraleedharan, used this statement of Antony to settle their political battle with him. Initially Antony had given a free hand to the officers who were investigating the infamous Marad massacre where a dozen Hindu fishermen were killed in Muslim terror attack. It was reported that Muslim League was not happy, that Antony gave a free hand to the police to arrest culprits, raid the mosque where the weapons were stored, and made plans to give compensation to the victims' families. The new regime is fashioned fully to the liking of the church, communists and the Muslim League.

Four months is no time to judge a government. Teething troubles are routine in a government formed only on negativism. A Prime Minister cannot be a puppet on a string for long, however, much the puppeteer enjoys the game.
 


Back                         Top

«« Back
 
 
 
  Search Articles
 
  Special Annoucements