Hindu Vivek Kendra
A RESOURCE CENTER FOR THE PROMOTION OF HINDUTVA
   
 
 
«« Back
A Collective Conscience?

A Collective Conscience?

Author: Dr Bhaskar Dasgupta
Publication: The  Hindustan Times
Date: April 22, 2005
URL: http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/5983_1331970,004300140003.htm

On April 24th, the living Armenians will gather to pay their respects to the million plus Armenians who were killed during WWI. Who cares about a century old genocide event other than the afflicted party, eh? Nobody much, I am afraid. Nobody cared about the genocide in Bangladesh 30 years ago with those genocidal maniacs now freely enjoying their lives, visiting the west and even having political power. Heck, nobody really cares about a genocide, which is going on as we speak, in Darfur. Each and every person who raises their voice about Palestine and Iraq and who talks about freedom and democracy in the Middle East while ignoring Darfur, they are all culpable hypocrites and mealy mouthed. It is easier to talk about the Americans and ignore the Sudanese, isn't it? However, we are getting away from the Armenians.

Genocide throws a very long shadow over human history. People remember genocide and massacres way after the proponents and opponents have died and turned to dust. Further crimes are committed because of that memory and frequently these memories transmogrify into tribal, racial, or national memory and live on and on. It is indeed very simple to say that to stop this from happening, no genocide should be done from now on, but as we have seen, it is easier said than done. The only time that genocide is forgotten is when the genocide is total and complete. For example, the Carthaginians were completely defeated, their fields sown with salt and the entire population sold into slavery. It does not arouse any major passions any more now, does it? There is nobody left to raise the issue.

In addition, time unfortunately does not heal these wounds either. Genocides and massacres carried out in the mists of antiquity are still remembered. The Assyrian invasion and massacres of the Israelites and the so-called Aryan Invasion of India thousands of years ago have passed into national history and still, in many ways, drive the national character in various ways. If we fast-forward to the last century, April has been noted for massacres and genocides, which cast a long shadow, even if we discard all the major and minor wars. Deir Yassin in Palestine, Jalianwalla Bagh in India, Columbine School in the USA, Tiananmen Square in China, the Holocaust, Rwanda, Katyn Forest Massacre in Poland, Gardelegen Massacre in Germany are just some of the massacres that come to mind.

Each and every one of these massacres still affects the world. Deir Yassin is remembered by the Palestinians, the Jalianwalla Bagh massacre by the Indians and Pakistani's, Columbine by so many parents who keep on facing the issue of guns in school children's hands, Tiananmen Square by hundreds of millions of Chinese, the Holocaust and Rwanda by the entire world, Katyn by the Poles, Gardelegen by the Jews and other nations whose citizens were burnt alive.

It is difficult not to feel sorry for the Armenians and at the same time, feel quite amazed at their persistence, tenacity and courage. For a nation, which is reputed to have descended from Noah and be the first nation to embrace Christianity, God has unfortunately taken His eye off these benighted people.

Armenian people had their own kingdom and were ruled by Armenians until 66 BC, when it was then taken over by the Roman Empire. Since then Romans, Persians, Byzantines, Arabs, Mongols, Turks and Russians ruled. For a short while in the beginning of the 20th century, it again became independent. That was not for long, as the Russian Bear again gathered poor old Armenia into its paws until 1991, when it became independent again.

So what happened to the Armenians? There is no dispute that very large numbers of Armenians died in the second decade of the 20th century (to be precise between 1915 and 1917). The range of casualties ranges from 0.2 to 1.8 million Armenians. Turkish Armenians, who were mostly Armenian Orthodox or Roman Catholic, clustered mostly around the eastern side of what is current Turkey. Please do remember that Turkey was facing civil war, rebellion, as well as being caught up in the greater tragedy of WWI at that time. Turkey went into the World War on the side of the Germans and in return Imperial Russia started poking its nose into the eastern side to raise Armenian nationalism. On the other hand, because of Turkish Sultan Abdul Hameed's policies, many western cosmopolitan Turkish Armenians threw their lot in with the Young Turks, who overthrew the Sultan. Nevertheless, the Young Turks were thoroughly upset with the Armenians in the east and decided to relocate them forcibly to Iraq (then Mesopotamia) and Syria. This forced migration is what lead to the killing of the Armenians.

The Turkish authorities set up about 25 concentration camps, some of which were death camps. There are reports of gassing chambers, poisoning or simple starvation techniques being applied to the inmates. The Turkish government created specific organisations to execute the genocidal policies.  Prisoners were selected on a homicidal basis and populated these organisations. In its defence, the Turkish government set up court-marital proceedings to try most of the senior members of the organisations later. Unfortunately, most of these trials were in absentia, since after 1918, most of the perpetrators had flown the coop. So what happened to the remainder of the Armenians after this genocide? Well, as their ancestral homes and farms had been razed, a lot of them emigrated. Many went to the newly formed Republic of Armenia, but with the Russian Bear breathing down their necks, a very large number emigrated to the west, forming one of the smaller but very vocal diaspora groups in the world.

Since the genocide, Armenians have tried their best to raise the issue and for obvious reasons, the Turks have reacted furiously against it. One example is the famous book, 'The Forty Days of Musa Dagh', by Franz Werfel written in 1933. Werfel also wrote prophetically about the pitfalls of Nazi anti-semitism and thus got his output banned by the Nazi's. The fictional story was based on a large dollop of fact, when Armenians in the village of Musa Dagh held out for 40 days against the genocidal attacks of the Ottoman forces. Finally the villagers escaped by clambering on two passing French navy ships. Musa Dagh became a symbol of resistance to many Jewish ghettos in WWII, facing the same kind of genocidal attempts by the Germans.

During the cold war, again the attempts by the Armenians to get the genocide recognised widely were thwarted by the fact that Turkey was a NATO ally. Notwithstanding this, many countries such as Argentina, Armenia, Canada, France, Italy, Greece, Russia, Slovakia, Sweden, Switzerland, Uruguay, and Vatican City acknowledged that this genocide has actually happened. In 1975, an Armenian terrorist group (Armenian Secret Army for the Liberation of Armenia) was formed. It went about knocking off Turkish civilians and diplomats in an attempt to force Turkey to recognise its actions against the Armenians. Furthermore it demanded restitutions and compensation and ceding territory in the Turkish northeast region for an Armenian autonomous state, which would eventually merge with the then Armenian Soviet Socialist Republic. This terrorist group eventually died out in the middle 1980's after the leaders were assassinated or died.

Now that the cold war is over and there is an international consensus to see genocides with a fresh eye, the Armenian Genocide has again raised its profile. The Armenian genocide's repercussions are still rumbling on in the Caucasian region - a very strange and gritty civil-cum-external war mixed with isolated enclaves, drug running, oil politics, historical grievances, great power pressures and mixtures, you name it. Since 1988, Armenia has been locked in low-level conflicts with the majority Turkish ethnic origin Azerbaijan over Nagorno-Karabakh, an Azerbaijan enclave that is primarily populated by Armenians. One can thank Josef Stalin for this absurdity. After the USSR collapsed, the conflict escalated and currently, the situation is that Armenia is in control over swathes of Azerbaijan as well as control over the Nagorno-Karabakh enclave.

A huge number of Armenians and Azerbaijanis were dislocated and displaced. This Nagorno-Karabakh enclave is a de facto independent state, joined to Armenia with a chicken neck corridor (like the Siliguri corridor) and is for all practical purposes, a part of the Armenian state. A cease-fire was established in 1994 and the conflict has been frozen despite many attempts to resolve the issue on a bilateral as well as international basis. Be that as it may, both Azerbaijan and Armenia have economically suffered and are counted in the ranks of the poorest nations. Russia, of course, is present in this area with military bases, political interference, and ham-fisted attempts to control its erstwhile satellites.

Because of the fallout of the Armenian genocide, Turkey has sealed its borders; while on the other side, the Azerbaijan boundary is sealed as well due to conflict. This unfortunately leaves Georgia in the north and Iran in the south, neither country being at the height of democratic or economic prowess. Turkish determination to sideline Armenia is evident from the fact that Caspian Sea oil is now going to be routed way north through Azerbaijan to Georgia and down to the Turkish port of Ceylan. Intermittently, there are calls in Turkey to open the land border and acknowledge the genocide, but the reaction is furious to say the least. One can only hope that Turkey's eventual accession to the EU will help in reducing tensions and that this blot on Turkey's history is addressed. It is a salutary lesson to all countries, which have genocide in their history. Whether or not genocide has been established, if the incidents pass into myth or history with a sense of injustice, the crime will keep on trickling and weeping pus for a very long time. Anatole France said back in 1916, "Armenia is dying, but it will survive. The little blood that it still has left is precious blood that will give birth to a heroic generation. A nation that does not want to die does not die." Does Turkey and rest of the world really want a nation, which is still burning for vengeance one hundred years after genocide was committed?

All this to be taken with a grain of salt!

(The opinion expressed herein are strictly the author's and do not reflect the positions, official or otherwise, of any firm or organisation, that the author is associated with at the present or has been in the past or may be in future. Dr Bhaskar Dasgupta, currently lives in the City of London and works there in various capacities in the Banking Sector.)
 


Back                          Top

«« Back
 
 
 
  Search Articles
 
  Special Annoucements