Hindu Vivek Kendra
A RESOURCE CENTER FOR THE PROMOTION OF HINDUTVA
   
 
 
«« Back
Peace to pieces?

Peace to pieces?

Author: Swapan Dasgupta
Publication: The Pioneer
Date: June 19, 2005

The country has reason to be extremely indebted to former Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee for throwing the much-needed spanner in the works of a peace process that has spun out of control. Even though the timing of his letter to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh is the subject of much low-life speculation, Vajpayee has articulated important nationalist concerns over New Delhi dancing to the tune of the military band in Islamabad.

It was important for someone of consequence to point out to a well-meaning but innocent Manmohan Singh that Pakistan made an absolute monkey of India over the travel bandobast of the Hurriyat delegation. First, it got India to climb down from its insistence that travel across the LoC must be conducted through passports. Second, in the case of the Hurriyat delegation, it violated the agreement that any travel outside the boundaries of the undivided Jammu and Kashmir would need passports and visas. Finally, President Pervez Musharraf had the cheek to brag that the irrelevance of the Indian passport at LoC confirmed that Jammu and Kashmir is disputed territory.

It is one thing for Pakistan to gloat over its undoubted diplomatic success. The triumphalism assumes an entirely different meaning when India responds with stony silence. Worse, Pakistan demonstrates that it can't be trusted with something as minor as arrangements over border crossing and the Indian Prime Minister responds by proposing Siachen be made a symbol of peace. Manmohan makes this gesture despite Pakistan refusing to authenticate any LoC in the mountains.

Musharraf doesn't think Indians are fools. Yet, after this fortnight he must be convinced India is a nation of invertebrates which equates self-destruction with nobility. As India resounds with talk about thinking out of the box and walking the extra mile, Musharraf must be dreaming of winning by diplomacy what he couldn't secure through war. No wonder he talks freely about sorting it all out in just two weeks. He has smelt an Indian meltdown.

It is curious that tell-tale cracks in the Indian diplomatic edifice are emerging at a time the US has proclaimed its intention of almost forcibly turning India into a great power with, if all goes well, associate permanent membership of the UN Security Council. Is India, therefore, jettisoning "old " diplomacy and embracing the more exciting global concerns of a new century?

The reality, unfortunately, is not so full of nuances. It is a tale of confusion and incompetence. First, there is an astonishing absence of coherence and coordination at the top. The energies of the National Security Adviser are spent in managing domestic politics and running the intelligence services. The External Affairs Minister has reduced himself to Sonia Gandhi's stenographer, a role he played with diligence in Moscow last week. His Ministry, which has traditionally played a role in policy making, is openly contemptuous of its own Minister and pursues the private agendas of its top officials. The PMO has compounded the mess because it is handicapped by the absence of a worthwhile successor to JN Dixit.

However, individuals are not the issue. What Vajpayee, quite understandably, didn't address in his letter is the growing impression that Indian foreign policy has mortgaged its soul to the US. Now, this may be an over-statement and fuelled by the cacophony of a fringe in the media, but it is important to recognise that such an impression not only exists but is bolstered each time India turns a blind eye to Pakistan's transgressions. The US' open disapproval of the Iran-Pakistan-India gas pipeline may have earned Mani Shankar Aiyar needless brownie points but it has also driven home the fact that Washington's desire for Indo-Pak bonhomie isn't entirely altruistic.

It is time India takes a dispassionate but hard look at where the peace process is heading. You don't have to be a hardliner or a war-monger to believe that Indian foreign policy has to be governed by enlightened self-interest, and not the agenda of a US-sponsored sadbhavna lobby.
 


Back                          Top

«« Back
 
 
 
  Search Articles
 
  Special Annoucements