Hindu Vivek Kendra
A RESOURCE CENTER FOR THE PROMOTION OF HINDUTVA
   
 
 
«« Back
Terror suspect numbers soar

Terror suspect numbers soar

Author: Antony Barnett, Jamie Doward and Mark Townsend
Publication: The Observer
Date: May 14, 2006
URL: http://politics.guardian.co.uk/homeaffairs/story/0,,1774572,00.html

MI5 source reveals a 'current, relentless and increasing' security threat since 7 July attacks as radical imam is set to be released from jail

The number of Islamic terror suspects in Britain being targeted by the security service MI5 has soared to 1,200, a 50 per cent rise since the London suicide bombings last July.

In a stark warning about the threat posed by Islamic radicals living in Britain, a senior intelligence source told The Observer that some of the public and politicians were failing to realise the risk facing the UK: 'In July 2005 we had 800 targets. I wish it was still at that level.'

He said that MI5 had identified another 400 targets since the bombings, suggesting that, rather than the threat to security from British-based terrorists being reduced, it had escalated since the attacks which killed 52 people. In September 2001, the security services estimated the number of UK-based terror suspects posing a 'risk to national security' at around 250, a figure that now stands almost five times higher. The intelligence source offered no explanation as the reason for the continued growth in Islamic radicalisation, but said the threat was 'current, relentless and increasing'.

Disclosure of this dramatic rise in potential terror suspects comes as it emerges that the radical imam who played a critical role in influencing one of the 7 July bombers is to walk free from prison within weeks. Abdullah al-Faisal was sentenced to seven years in prison in 2003 after being convicted of inciting murder and racial hatred.

The government's official account of the 7 July bombings published last week makes it clear that Jermaine Lindsay attended at least one of Faisal's lectures and listened to his lectures on tapes.

At his trial a court was told how Faisal, who branded non-Muslims cockroaches that should be exterminated, called on his followers to learn how to use rifles, fly planes and use missiles to kill 'unbelievers'. In one tape, Faisal - who attended Brixton Mosque in south London, where the shoebomber Richard Reid met Zacharias Moussaoui, the only man to be jailed for his part in the 11 September attacks on America - tells Muslim women to prepare their children for jihad by giving them toy guns.

The Observer understands Faisal is soon to be released having served little more than half of his sentence. In preparation for his release, an order for deportation to his native Jamaica was filed by Home Office officials on 30 March. His lawyers are believed to have made representations to the Home Office in an attempt to secure his release on parole pending deportation. The move is likely to raise concerns that Faisal will be free to preach his extremist views once he has been returned to Jamaica, from where a number of Islamic terrorists have originated, including Lindsay.

Meanwhile this week lawyers acting on behalf of the family of one of the victims of the London bombings will notify the Home Secretary, John Reid, they are launching legal action over the government's response to the 7 July attacks.

Having sought legal opinion following last Thursday's publication of the two investigations into the attacks, City law firm Leigh Day & Co will commence a legal challenge against the government's decision not to hold a public inquiry into the atrocities. Opposition politicians joined survivors of the attacks and victims' families calling for such an inquiry.

Acting on behalf of the family of Behnaz Mozakka, 47, who was killed when Lindsay detonated his explosive on the Piccadilly line tube, lawyers will cite a number of key unanswered question that the government has a 'duty to answer'.

Their case will be brought using human rights legislation which indicates that a state has a duty to investigate where it can be claimed that a government could bear some responsibility.


Back                          Top

«« Back
 
 
 
  Search Articles
 
  Special Annoucements