Author:
Publication:
Date:
Karan Thapar: Hello and welcome to Devil's
Advocate. Now that the Supreme Court has asked the Government on what basis
it proposes reservation for OBCs in higher education, I want to ask the Government
precisely what explanation will it give. That is the key question that I should
put today to one of the minister concern with the issue, Finance Minister
P Chidambaram.
Finance Minister the protesting students who
met you some 10 or 12 days ago said that you are an ardent advocate for the
cause of reservations in higher education for OBCs. Is that a correct description
of your position?
P Chidambaram: Those adjectives are their's.
I support reservation.
Karan Thapar: So you think that reservation
is the right thing?
P Chidambaram: Among all the instruments available
to us for affirmative action, the one that is proved most effective is reservation.
Karan Thapar: Explain to me. Many people would
say that there is no doubt that steps need to be taken to help the OBCs to
get greater access to higher education. Why do you believe reservation is
the right way of doing it?
P Chidambaram: Experience tells us that.
Karan Thapar: What experience?
P Chidambaram: The experience of Southern
states.
Karan Thapar: What is the experience of Southern
states?
P Chidambaram: Let me tell you. It all began
in the state of Mysore almost 75 years ago. In Tamil Nadu we have had reservations
now for over 60 years. Andhra and Kerala have reservations for over 50 years.
Karan Thapar: Have they succeeded?
P Chidambaram: Yes undoubtedly they have.
Let me explain. Once you get a set of parents from the backward communities
who are educated, the degrees the graduation the post graduation, then you
find the second generation child is able to compete more effectively with
children of families who have say 200 years of unbroken tradition of learning.
Karan Thapar: So you are saying that reservations
in south India have improved the quality of education for everyone?
P Chidambaram: Undoubtedly.
Karan Thapar: Then let me put you the opposite
of that. Because it's widely believed that what you are saying is an illusion.
All the centres of excellence which create the reputation for south India
that you are referring to, I am talking about the Shankar Netralaya, the National
Law College, the IIT Madras, the Indian Institute of Science Manipal there
were other medical colleges, none of them have reservations for OBCs and as
the sociologist Dipankar Gupta has pointed out in every single one of these
the vast majority of faculty are non-OBC. They come from outside Tamil Nadu
and they were not part of the Tamil Nadu education system. So clearly if they
are proved its because they escaped from reservations not because of it.
P Chidambaram: For every institution that
you have given, I can give you institution where there is reservation. There
is reservation in Anna University. There is reservation in the Bharathidasan
Institute. There is reservation in the medical colleges of Tamil Nadu. There
is reservation in number of educational institutions.
Karan Thapar: Shifting to what you have mentioned
about medical colleges of Tamil Nadu, because again Dipankar Gupta shows one
thing that reservations for OBCs done in the South was to proliferate the
number of minority institutions. And the example I want to give you is in
fact the medical colleges. Out of the 120 minority medical colleges in India,
74 or 61 per cent are in the four Southern states and Pondicherry. Clearly
that is a sign that in fact people are seeking alternatives to reservations
as a way of escaping from reservations.
P Chidambaram: You are drawing the wrong conclusion
from the right fact.
Karan Thapar: I am not drawing conclusions.
Dipankar Gupta, who is the top sociologist, has drawn the conclusion.
P Chidambaram: Mr Dipankar Gupta can have
an opinion. You can have an opinion. But you must listen to the other opinion.
So just be patient. In Tamil Nadu it all started with government medical colleges.
When government medical colleges had reservations the demand was great and
the government was not willing to start more medical colleges. So it is in
Karnataka, so it in Andhra. Then the private sectors started medical colleges
and initially it started with Christian institutions. When Christian institutions
were started then the Muslim started their own institutions.
Karan Thapar: Now you have even Telgu language
institutions.
P Chidambaram: Then the Hindus started institutions,
nothing wrong with that, nothing wrong with private sectors starting institutions.
Karan Thapar: You misunderstood my question.
I am not saying there is anything wrong with the private sectors starting
institutions. I am saying the reason they are starting institutions is because
the quality of education in government institutions, because of reservation,
has collapsed.
P Chidambaram: That's not correct. The best
medical education in Tamil Nadu is still given by the government medical colleges.
There are just I think one may be two private medical colleges in Tamil Nadu.
Today Chennai is an admittedly an excellent centre for medical colleges.
Karan Thapar: Mr Chidambaram you are sitting
in front of me advocating that reservations have improved the quality of education
in Tamil Nadu. The truth is that you yourself didn't go to an institution
where there is reservation for OBCs. You went to Loyala College where there
is no reservation for OBCs and then you went to Harvard. Your son went to
Don Bosco School, Texas University and Cambridge University.
P Chidambaram: You got your facts wrong. I
went to Presidency College, which has reservation.
Karan Thapar: For your MA at which point in
time affiliation to colleges were not important.
P Chidambaram: Your facts are wrong. I went
to Presidency College for my basic under graduate degree where there is reservation.
I went to Law College for my law degree where there is reservation. I am not
a beneficiary of reservation but I know that reservation brought in students
to my class would otherwise have never got in.
Karan Thapar: Mr Chidambaram your son went
to Don Bosco School where there is no reservation. Then he went to the University
of Texas where there is no reservation and then he went to Cambridge University.
P Chidambaram: My son would have never got
the benefit of reservation anyway.
Karan Thapar: Did you not send your son abroad
deliberately because you knew that the standard of education in Tamil Nadu
had collapsed.
P Chidambaram: No not at all. I am a beneficiary
of the educational system in Tamil Nadu and I am proud about the educational
system in Tamil Nadu. It can be better that is a different matter. Neither
my son nor I are the beneficiary of reservations.
Karan Thapar: You are saying that in fact
the real track record and experience that establishes that reservation is
good for education in the Southern state, lets accept it.
P Chidambaram: No, not only in Southern states.
Now we have evidence that in Maharashtra it has helped. We have evidence that
it has helped also in some other states.
Karan Thapar: People would challenge it, lets
leave that aside. Lets come to the more basic aspect of this matter. If you
believe that reservation for OBCs is right, do you have any idea what percentage
of the Indian population is actually OBC?
P Chidambaram: We have empirical evidence
that in a state like Tamil Nadu 69 per cent is reserved today.
Karan Thapar: That's the reservation that
is not necessary correlated with the percentage of the population.
P Chidambaram: It is because in the state
first we have had the Satanand Commission we have had the Ambasankar Commission
which have done as best as they can an enumeration of the back ward caste
in Tamil Nadu.
Karan Thapar: But then if you are going by
the 69 per cent figure in fact the situation is even more confused than I
thought because I was going to say that the three disputed figures that we
have nationally the Mandal at 52 per cent, the NSSO at 32.1 per cent and the
National Family Health Survey 29.8 per cent. Now you are adding to that a
69 per cent figure. Clearly the range goes from 29.8 per cent to 69 per cent
and you don't know about it.
P Chidambaram: You ask for empirical evidence
and you don't have the patience to wait for the answer. Tamil Nadu we have
had the Satanand Commission, the Ambasankar Commission and nobody has challenged
that count so far in Tamil Nadu.
Karan Thapar: It may be true of Tamil Nadu,
what about nationwide?.
P Chidambaram: In Andhra they have had counts,
in Karnataka they have had counts in Kerala they have had counts. And the
people of Tamil Nadu, Andhra and Kerala have not challenged those counts.
At the national level, you are right, the
only count we have had is Mandal, which was seriously questioned. We have
had the national sample survey. The point is when the Mandal was implemented
in government jobs, Supreme Court upheld reservation of 27 per cent.
Karan Thapar: But what the Supreme Court didn't
comment up on and that is the very issue they have raised now in the latest
question and I put to you is what's the basis of it.
P Chidambaram: Well the Government will answer
it.
Karan Thapar: Well what answer will the government
give.
P Chidambaram: I am not preparing the answer.
The concern department will prepare an answer.
Karan Thapar: But is it such a secret that
needs preparation.
P Chidambaram: You will have to gather all
the material available.
Karan Thapar: This is very interesting. You
have already decided that you want 27 per cent reservation for OBCs but you
don't know on what basis you want it. Now you have to go back and discover
the basis.
P Chidambaram: I am sure the material is there.
We are not discovering the basis.
Karan Thapar: You are concocting it.
P Chidambaram: No we are not either. The ministry
has to put together all the material available to it to reach the conclusion
of 27 per cent. It will be based on material and the material will be put
together - wait for the material.
Karan Thapar: But that's your claim. What
I am saying to you is that the material available actually is contradictory.
The range, which it covers, goes from 29.8 per cent to 69 per cent, that you
quoted or at best all you can do is to draw an average from it. Clearly you
do not know what percentage of Indians OBC, which is why when the Supreme
Court asked you for the basis you are deeply embarrassed.
P Chidambaram: No I am not embarrassed at
all. You are completely wrong. Wait for the affidavit to be filed at the Supreme
Court. Why are you unwilling to wait for that affidavit.
Karan Thapar: The affidavit will be filed.
Why are you unwilling to share with the country the basis of a decision that
you have already announced?
P Chidambaram: The offices and the ministry
concern will share with it. I am not the minister in charge with the department.
Karan Thapar: But you are part of the group
of ministers which is responsible that is why I am speaking to you.
P Chidambaram: Of course. I am satisfied that
there is material…
Karan Thapar: Then share that satisfaction
with us.
P Chidambaram: Listen to me. That will come
in the Supreme Court in a form of an affidavit. Material will be placed. I
am not embarrassed. All I am saying is wait for the affidavit.
Karan Thapar: Let me tell you why I want to
continue this question. This is the reason I am asking you, the government
has announced a decision. The decision we have been told is in fact irreversible.
Yet you can't give us the basis of the decision.
P Chidambaram: Yes, I can give you the basis.
There is a question from the Supreme Court. We have got the Mandal report.
We have got state reports, which are all being compiled now. We have got the
NSS survey. After all India is only a collection of states.
Karan Thapar: And they are all contradicting
each other.
P Chidambaram: They are not contradicting.
You have not read a single report. Let me ask you a question. Have you read
the Satanand report?
Karan Thapar: No but I have read the NSSO
figures and the NSSO figures are nationwide.
P Chidambaram: Please answer my question.
Have you read the Satanand report?
Karan Thapar: But they refer only to Tamil
Nadu.
P Chidambaram: That is right.
Karan Thapar: I am talking about the nationwide.
I am very keen to know what is the basis on which the decision has been taken.
P Chidambaram: If the Tamil Nadu Satanand
report is based on evidence, if the Tamil Nadu Ambasankar report is based
on evidence that represents six crore people who make up the 100 core. Similarly
the Andhra reports, the Kerala reports, the Karnataka reports and any other
report that will be available in every other state, all that material will
be put together, the Mandal will be referred to, the NSS survey will be referred
to and a proper affidavit will be filed. Obviously I can't give all that material
in an interview lasting 10 minutes.
Karan Thapar: There is something else that
also emerges from this. If you are saying that all that material will be put
together, clearly it hasn't been put together as yet.
P Chidambaram: Wrong again. It will be put
together in the form of an affidavit and will be given to the SC.
Karan Thapar: If it is going to be put together
then it hasn't been put together as yet?
P Chidambaram: Listen you are quibbling on
words. Let me explain my position. You are quibbling and therefore there is
no point quibbling in an interview. The material will be put together; the
material is available where Supreme Court asks a question. Suppose the Supreme
Court asks what have you done about a particular tax matter. I know the answer
but will have to put together the material in a form of an affidavit.
Karan Thapar: This is not a tax matter. This
is an issue that affects the future of people in India.
P Chidambaram: Everything affects the people
of India.
Karan Thapar: Its an issue that has been challenged.
When the government is asked what's the basis on which you have announced
27 per cent reservation in higher education for the OBCs. It's an amazing
thing to say the government will answer in due course. The government needs
to give an answer today.
P Chidambaram: I am sorry the government does
not have to answer you in an interview.
Karan Thapar: Its not me its the people of
India.
P Chidambaram: Government will answer in the
proper forum in Parliament in the Supreme Court not in an interview conducted
by you.
Karan Thapar: But you can't tell the people
of India today.
P Chidambaram: I have told you about the material.
Shall I say it in Tamil for a change?
Karan Thapar: No don't say it in Tamil.
P Chidambaram: I have given you the material,
the state government's report. Let me repeat it once again for you. Several
reports done by the state governments counter backward casts. The Mandal report,
the NSS report and any other surveys.
Karan Thapar: All of which are contradictory.
P Chidambaram: That's your judgement. We don't
believe its contradictory.
Karan Thapar: Its not my judgement. It's a
fact.
P Chidambaram: If it is a fact then why are
you asking me the question.
Karan Thapar: Because I am trying to prove
that you don't have the basis for the decision you made.
P Chidambaram: Go ahead and prove it if it
satisfies you.
Karan Thapar: If the people of India listening
to this interview come to the conclusion that it does not appear to them that
the government have an explanation, what would you say.
P Chidambaram: The people of India are not
people entirely of your thinking. The people of India consists of SCs, STs,
and backward classes also. They will be quite happy to know the large amount
of material is available in every state. Large amount of material is available
to support the argument that a significant proportion of seats must be reserved
for the OBCs.
Karan Thapar: It sounds to me what you are
saying is give us time we will come up with an explanation. We can't give
it today but in eight weeks we will.
P Chidambaram: Sorry that's your conclusion.
Let me conclude the way I summarised it. My conclusion is there is ample material,
you are simply refusing to see the material, You expect an answer in an interview.
The answer will not be given to you in an interview. The answer will be given
in a proper affidavit supported by proper documentation in the Supreme Court
and in Parliament.
Karan Thapar: And not before eight weeks.
All right that's your answer.
Karan Thapar: We have disputed whether the
Government has an explanation to give to the Supreme Court or not. Another
issue that the students have raised with you is their demand for a non-political
expert committee to review the way reservations have functioned for the last
50 odd years. The Government, in its reply has said that it will examine this
demand. Does that mean 'yes', does that mean 'no' or does it mean that you
are simply playing for time?
P Chidambaram: As I understand the Government's
reply, there is no ground to review whether there should be reservation or
not - there is no ground at all.
Karan Thapar: What about reviewing the way
they function?
P Chidambaram: If you want to review how the
reservation is implemented, it is fairly simple.
Karan Thapar: Not how they are implemented,
whether they are functioning effectively.
P Chidambaram: Oh, they are.
Karan Thapar: We all know how they are implemented,
what I am questioning is the efficacy.
P Chidambaram: The effect is, as I said at
the beginning of the interview, can be seen in the Southern states. Members
belonging to the OBCs have risen in the society and in the economy. There
is an aspiration among those classes, which cannot be suppressed for too long.
Karan Thapar: If you are so confident that
reservations have worked in the Southern states, which many people are strongly
and strenuously disputing, then agree to the review, cause the review will
presumably prove your point. Why aren't you agreeing to the review?
P Chidambaram: You need to understand that
Parliament is competent to make a law and each member of Parliament represents
the people. If the overwhelming view in the country - as you believe it is
and which I think is completely wrong - is 'for' reservation and Parliament
reflects that view.
Karan Thapar: Then all the more reason to
grant a review. Why are you not prepared to not grant a review?
P Chidambaram: I can't speak for the Government
because I don't know the Government's position on the question of review.
Karan Thapar: Can I interrupt and tell you
what the Government's position is as handed in a formal document by Oscar
Fernandes to the students. It said, 'this will be examined'. I am asking you
what it means. Does it mean 'yes', does it mean 'no' or does it mean that
the 'Government doesn't know'?
P Chidambaram: As I said, I don't know. I
have not seen that document.
Karan Thapar: A senior Minister, on a Group
of Ministers handling this issue doesn't know what the Government's position
is?
P Chidambaram: Wait a minute, the Government's
position is a position that will be taken in the Cabinet and a Group of Ministers
is 'advisory'. If Mr Fernandes has said it will be examined, I am sure he
means every word and it will be examined.
Karan Thapar: But that is not the Government's
position. It is only Mr Fernandes' position because the Government's position
you said will be taken in the Cabinet.
P Chidambaram: You must give up this habit
if quibbling Karan.
Karan Thapar: I am not quibbling.
P Chidambaram: You are. I think you are and
many of your viewers will think you are.
Karan Thapar: And many of my viewers may think
that I may have actually identified an important and interesting loophole.
P Chidambaram: Nothing. You have not identifies
any loophole. If Mr Fernandes said that the matter will be examined, I am
sure it is being examined by the concerned Ministry, it will come to the Cabinet
for a decision and I cannot now say what will be the decision.
Karan Thapar: All right, let me then ask you
your personal opinion, cause I presume as one of the more intelligent members
of the Cabinet...
P Chidambaram: In the Cabinet, I will give
my opinion.
Karan Thapar: Share it with the country. We
look up to you and the country is listening to you.
P Chidambaram: I don't agree with you. A very
small section understands English and listens to your programme.
Karan Thapar: Let me ask the question differently
- after 50 odd years of reservations and the controversy that they have created,
atleast in some quarters, do you believe that a review of how they function
would be a sensible thing to do?
P Chidambaram: If review means questioning
the justification of reservation, I say 'no'.
Karan Thapar: A review means questioning whether
they have worked effectively or not and if it is to be found that they haven't
worked effectively, that would end up questioning this justification as well.
So, there is no doubt that one could lead to the other, but not necessarily.
P Chidambaram: I would not give my view, which
I have to give in the Cabinet, but I know from experience that reservations
have helped many members of the OBCs to rise in the Southern states. I am
totally convinced about it.
Karan Thapar: If after 50 years of functioning,
the very Constitution could have been reviewed and a Constitution review committee
set up, which in fact found, despite all the criticisms that had initially
arisen, that the Constitution was by and large functioning very effectively.
Why then, are you worried about a review of reservation? Reservation is a
very small part of the Constitution.
P Chidambaram: I am not worried, that decision
will be taken by the Cabinet.
Karan Thapar: When will this decision be taken?
P Chidambaram: Whenever the matter comes to
Cabinet.
Karan Thapar: When is that likely to happen?
P Chidambaram: I have no idea.
Karan Thapar: So, in other words this matter
may never come to Cabinet because that may be a very effective way of stalling
it.
P Chidambaram: Again you are quibbling. When
Mr Fernandes said that the matter will be examined, the logical course is
that the matter will be examined and placed before Cabinet. From that, you
don't jump to the conclusion that it will never come to Cabinet.
Karan Thapar: Let me then come to another
issue. The Government has committed itself to extending 27 per cent reservations
to OBCs in higher education on the basis of the recommendation of the Mandal
report. Your late leader, Rajiv Gandhi, who you revere, in a speech in Parliament
on September 6, 1990 effectively showed that Mandal was inaccurate, it was
unscientific, it was misleading and in very many areas, it was actually wrong.
P Chidambaram: I know that speech.
Karan Thapar: His conclusion is important.
In the end, it may be emphasised that the survey has no pretensions to being
a piece of academic research. On what basis then today, as successors to Rajiv
Gandhi, do you want to keep pursuing the report?
P Chidambaram: Please remember, after that
speech, in 1991, a Congress Government implemented reservation in Government
jobs and that has come to stay.
Karan Thapar: So, in other words, Mr Gandhi's
position has been forgotten?
P Chidambaram: No, I respect his view.
Karan Thapar: So much so that you want to
go ahead with the report that was effectively rubbishing.
P Chidambaram: Please remember, it has been
implemented in 1991. This is not the first time it is being implemented.
Karan Thapar: He was deeply critical of the
52 per cent figure.
P Chidambaram: He was.
Karan Thapar: He actually said that this figure
includes many castes that are forward castes and many castes that are Scheduled
Castes, he disputed that figure.
P Chidambaram: I am aware of that speech,
but the fact remains that in 1991, a Congress Government implemented reservation
in Government jobs. And now, 15 years later, the demand is to implement reservations
in educational institutions.
Karan Thapar: Today, your Government that
functions effectively under the tutelage of his widow will be in fact implementing
something that he in his greatest speech had deeply criticised.
P Chidambaram: That is a wrong way to look
at it. The Government has to reflect the realities and the aspirations of
today. Today, there is a Parliament, there are political parties, there are
political parties representing the very backward castes as a coalition Government,
MPs reflect, I believe, the aspirations of their constituents. If Parliament
decides that a Bill must be passed to provide for reservation for Backward
Castes in educational institutions, that is not showing disrespect to Rajiv
Gandhi, the way you put it, that means we are reflecting the current realities.
Karan Thapar: All right, let's accept your
word. A pleasure talking to you on Devil's Advocate.
P Chidambaram: Thank you very much.
