Hindu Vivek Kendra
A RESOURCE CENTER FOR THE PROMOTION OF HINDUTVA
   
 
 
«« Back
Politicising Amarnath?

Politicising Amarnath?

Author: Mohit Kandhari
Publication: The Pioneer
Date: July 9, 2006

On May 23, when Shri Amarnath Shrine Board CEO Dr Arun Kumar announced the annual Amarnath pilgrimage calendar starting June 11 - it usually starts in July - hopes were raised that this time, the number of pilgrims would pass previous records. Furthermore, with Chief Minister Ghulam Nabi Azad reputedly close to Jammu and Kashmir Governor and SASB chairman Lt-Gen (Retd) SK Sinha, people also hoped the yatra would not be politicised in the manner associated with the regime of former chief minister Mufti Muhammad Sayeed.

But that was not to be. The Amarnath yatra this time got embroiled in the mother of all controversies, with stories being put out in the media suggesting that the lingam inside cave shrine this year was man-made and not natural, and located a few feet away from the place of the original lingam.

The story's proponents would have us believe that someone thought it better to put together an artificial lingam in the absence of a natural one, which reportedly did not form this year. If that is true, glaciologists say there could be several reasons for it - inadequate snowfall, snow melt due to high temperatures, a delay in snow formation and the yatra starting early.

Shrine board authorities did receive complaints before the yatra began. "There were complaints about the piling of snowflakes and applying vermilion on the lingam by some people. Immediately, a barricade was raised and the side entrance closed," the board spokesman said.

A week after the controversy broke out, pilgrim traffic continued unabated. More than one lakh devotees have visited the shrine till now this year.

Was the artificial lingam story leaked by certain people to serve their vested interests? We may never know. But the events do bring the PDP and the Muftis into the picture. A study of events preceding this year's pilgrimage point to a connection between the family and the shrine.

This issue has the potential to unseat the Governor who also doubles up as SASB chairman and has worked tirelessly for the yatra. The Governor and the Muftis have long stopped seeing eye to eye after stories appeared saying he had forwarded adverse reports on the functioning of the PDP Government to the Centre before the present chief minister took over the state.

Soonafter the yatra schedule was announced, PDP President Mehbooba Mufti accused the board of creating roadblocks for locals associated with the pilgrimage by deciding to impose a registration fee of Rs 2,400 each on labourers, horse-cart pullers and tent owners and even threatened an agitation.

Later, Mehbooba Mufti complained on behalf of the residents of Kangan and Pahalgam, the two pilgrimage base camps, that the construction of large concrete structures and roads would not only deprive locals who offered pilgrims amenities of their livelihood, but also destabilise the region's ecology.

While making these allegations, however, Mehbooba Mufti chose to ignore the fact that when Mufti Muhammad Sayeed was chief minister in 2004, he had allowed certain influential individuals to pitch about 300 tents offering temporary conveniences near the shrine with scant regard for environmental degradation. At that time, several religious organisations had also accused Sayeed of trying to "sabotage" the pilgrimage after reports suggested that some miscreants reportedly broke open the iron gates of the holy cave.

Sayeed has had a long history of locking horns with the Governor over the issue of duration of the yatra and providing security to the pilgrims.

What was Mehbooba Mufti trying to achieve by raising her voice in support of local residents against the board? There are no readymade answers. At the same time, the manner in which the artificial lingam issue was blown out of proportion by certain sections of the media could mean that vested interests had connived to dislodge the Governor.

BJP spokesman and state unit vice-president Prof Hari Om told The Pioneer that the issue was an attempt by vested interests to undermine the sanctity of the shrine and drive pilgrims away by targeting them. Mahant Deependra Giri, custodian of the holy mace of Lord Shiva, told The Pioneer that while he did not believe that anyone in the board played spoilsport, the controversy has certainly hurt the pilgrims' sentiments.

Irrespective of whether stories of the artificial lingam are true, the episode has certainly jolted the faith of the lakhs of Amarnath devotees even though they continue to throng the shrine.


Back                          Top

«« Back
 
 
 
  Search Articles
 
  Special Annoucements