Author: MA Khan
Publication: Islam-Watch.org
Date: July 24, 2006
URL: http://www.islam-watch.org/MA_Khan/IncessantTerrorism.htm
In recent times, overshadowing the relative
calm of the past few decades, there has been a sudden surge in violence and
terrorist activities by the Islamic zealots and fanatics. Hence, there is
a debate as to why Muslims did not indulge in terror and violence during the
past decades and centuries. There might be some consolation in the thought
that Islamic violence was not so evident during the early 20th century. However,
there is also a general impression amongst both Muslims and the non-Muslims
that there was never any Islamic violence and terrorism until the last 2-3
decades. One respected moderate Muslim columnist Tanveer Jaffri in his recent
column, Terror and Terrorism in the World: The Remedy, wrote:
Obviously, in the life of Hazrat Mohammad,
taking his relations with the Islam, there is no incident showing terror or
terrorism. Even Hazrat Mohammad himself never fought against anyone, in his
lifetime.
Presuming Mr. Jafri a good-hearted and honest
person, I believe that his verdict on Prophet Muhammad's non-involvement in
any kind of violence in his life-time is his honest opinion. Not only Mr.
Jafri, but most of the moderate Muslims also bear such a thought about the
Prophet of Islam. Yet, such thought, even if born out of honest opinion, is
thoroughly erroneous and is the result of utter ignorance. Instead of being
a nonviolent person, Muhammad's life is a testament of ceaseless raids and
plundering expeditions of highway caravans and waging wars against the infidel
(non-Muslims community). He himself had orchestrated more than one hundred
raids, plundering expeditions and wars. Even just before his death, he was
in the planning of organizing an expedition, but he fell sick suddenly, from
which he never recovered. By this time, he had already extirpated all the
Jewish settlements around Medina by means of mass slaughter and enslavement
(Banu Quraiza) and mass exile (Banu Nadhir and Banu Qainuka). He had also
launched expeditions against the Jewish tribes in far-flung places like Khaybar
and Kinan. In his death bed one of his last wishes was: "Let there be
no other religion except Islam". This wish was carried out to fruition
by his immediate successors, notably Caliph Abu Bakar and Omar.
The fact is: the kind of terror and violence
perpetrated by Prophet Muhammad has little or no parallel amongst the terrorism
and violence of today's Islamic terrorists. The extermination of the Jews
from Medina requires another mention here. Consider Muhammad's raiding the
Jewish enclave of Banu Quraiza, because they did not join the Muslim army
when the Meccans attacked the Muslims in the famous battle of the Trench,
which, the Quraiza tribe was obligated to do because of a covenant of mutual
protection signed earlier. The first reason of unwillingness of the Quraiza
people to join the battle that Muhammad started was that the Jewish people
were sick and tired of such violent activities and blood-baths, raiding and
plundering expeditions and fighting wars one after another. Secondly, the
Mecca army in this battle was too powerful to ensure a decisive victory, had
it not been for the trenches Muhammad had dug - thanks to the Salman the Persian,
who gave the idea to Muhammad from his Persian experience of war. After a
25-day seize by Muhammad of the Jewish enclave, the Banu Quraiza tribe surrendered
unconditionally and pleaded Muhammad to let them go into exile. Instead, Muhammad
decided to slaughter all the males of weapon-bearing age, around 600 to 900
in numbers, took of their women and children as slaves and took possession
of their homes, properties and farms and distributed them amongst the Muslims
who had participated in this genocide. The world is yet to witness an example
of similar barbaric atrocity perpetrated by today's Islamic terrorists, though
we can be absolutely certain that today's Islamist jihadists ardently crave
to match their Prophet's examples.
Another incidence which requires mentioning
again here is Muhammad's victorious entry into the city of Mecca, his paternal
hometown. Upon his entry into the city, he destroyed all the temples and deities
which his ancestors had worshipped for centuries. Soon after his invasion
of Mecca, the Prophet sent his general Khalid bin Walid to destroy all the
pagan temples of the neighboring tribes of Mecca. Khalid reached the Jazima
tribe and asked them to say, "We are Muslims". But they said, "We
are Sabians" - whereupon Khalid slaughtered the whole tribe. The Jazima
tribe people had never given any troubles to the Muslims. Is there a parallel
of such barbarity amongst terror acts of Muslim extremists of today? No, there
isn't. The truth is: the end of his 22 years of religious campaign, Muhammad
had depopulated the entire Southern Arabia of the infidel pagans, Jews, Christians
and Sabians etc. through mass slaughter, enslavement and forced conversion
and mass exile. These acts of violence, cruelty and barbarity of the Prophet
have no parallel amongst violent acts of today's Islamic terrorists. Of course,
throughout the Islamic world, there are scattered incidences of violence and
attacks on non-Muslims' homes, churches and temples and incidences of raping
the infidel women. But there is no incidence in which women of an entire community
being captured as sex-slaves, all weapon-bearing males of a community put
to summary execution or an entire village or community of the Kaffirs sent
to exile.
The acts of violence and terrorism did not
just disappear with the death of the Prophet but was redoubled by his immediate
successors; namely, Abu Bakr, Omar and Othman et al. who were Muhammad's closest
friends. By the time of third Caliph Othman's rule, all remaining Jews and
Christians of entire Arabian peninsula were forcibly converted, expelled or
slain which fulfilled Prophet's death-bed wish that no second religion remain
in the holy land of Arabia.
Immediately after Muhammad's death, many Muslims
who were forced to accept Islam wanted to leave Islam. Prophet's first biographer,
ibn Ishak writes, "When the apostle was dead, most of the Muslims thought
of withdrawing from Islam and had made up their mind to do". Many tribes
rose in rejection of Islam, turned to their tribal leaders and rejected to
pay taxes. The immediate task of the first Caliph, Abu Bakr, was to bring
these fierce and intractable tribes into submission. Under the command of
fierce Khalid ibn Walid, a bitter and sanguinary battle, termed the Wars of
the Apostasy (ridda) followed. The revolt was cruelly suppressed and the recalcitrant
tribes were forced back to the fold of Islam.
The fanaticism and barbarity associated with
these conquering expeditions need a sampling here. The kind of fierce intolerance
and fanaticism being inspired by Prophet Muhammad amongst his followers have
no parallel in the annals of any other religion. Under his command, his followers
were ready to kill even their own fathers and brothers, yet others' wished
for his approval. Prophet's biographer Hisahm al-Kalbi notes that the son
of the great hypocrite Abduallah ibn Obayi had begged for prophet's permission
to kill his own father and bring the head to the prophet. But Abdullah was
an influential man and the prophet didn't dare. According to Ibn-Ishak, in
July 624, being increasingly exasperated with the Jews, the prophet ordered:
"Kill any Jew whoever falls into your power." Thereupon a Muslim
convert named Muhaysa fell upon a rich Jewish merchant who happened to be
on the same way and killed him, despite the fact that he belonged to his own
tribe. When his elder brother, still a Jew, scolded him for killing someone
of his own tribe, Muhaysa replied, "By Allah, if Muhammad commanded me
to kill you also, I would have cut off your head". So impressed was the
Jewish man by his brother's conviction to Islam that he immediately converted
to Islam. The prophet's fanatic inspiration to intolerance and violence compelled
Voltaire to comment: Such conducts cannot be defended by any person, 'unless
superstition has choked all the light of reason from him.'
The violent fanaticism, inspired by the Prophet,
was carried forward with ruthless zeal by his immediate followers. Khalid
ibn Walid, who fought on the enemy side in the battle of Ohud but later embraced
Islam, became one of the most blood-thirsty and brutal of conquerors, if judged
even by the standard of his day. Yet his cruelty and rapacity were and still
are greatly extolled amongst the Muslims, who honored him with the title of
"the Sword of Allah" (Sayif Allah).
The utter barbarity of Khalid was displayed
in May, 633, when he defeated the Zoroastrian Persians at the Battle of Olayis
in Southern Iraq (between Hira and Basra). For two days, his soldiers rounded
up the great multitude of prisoners and fugitives, who were then herded on
to a dry river bed and were butchered until it became a crimson stream. The
place thereafter proudly bore the title of 'the River of Blood'. Abu Bakr,
the caliph was overjoyed when the news of victory and massacre reached him.
On the barbarity of Khalid, Benjamin Walker
writes:
A wine-lover and lustful debaucher, Khalid
took sickly sadistic delight in beheading a defeated chieftain on the battle-field,
selecting his wife (if young) or daughter and celebrating his nuptials with
her on the spot soaked with the blood of the victim (father/husband of the
bride). [Walker, Foundations of Islam, p. 316]
Before Muslims conquered Jerusalem, the scattered
communities of Jews and pagans lived in harmony along with the Christians.
When Caliph Omar conquered the Jerusalem, much venerated in the Koran and
a holy place in Islam, in 637 - the Jewish temples and Christian Churches
were razed to the ground and widespread looting and pillaging was unleashed.
The Patriarch Sophronius of Jerusalem (634-638), who witnessed spread of Islam
in Arabia and the fall of Jerusalem with his own eyes, described the Muslim
invaders as "godless barbarians" who "burnt churches, destroyed
monasteries, profaned the Crosses and blasphemed against Christ and the church."
The following year, thousands died of famine resulted from the destruction
and pillage by the Muslim conquerors of Jerusalem. [Ibn Warraq, Why I am not
a Muslim, p. 219]
The invading Muslims destroyed the main Jewish
temple and Omar laid the foundation of the much venerated al-Aqsa mosque with
his own hands in its place. He declared a decree that Jews and Christians
could practice religion only in the confines of their churches and homes.
No new churches would be built, no conversion should be made, crosses should
not be exhibited in their churches and no public display of their faith should
be made. These rather benevolent treatments were accorded to the Jews and
Christians under the privileged term of the Dhimmis (Zimmis) as accorded to
the people of the Book in the Koran. Yet, repression and discrimination, attacks
on pilgrims, raid and ransacking of the monasteries and the destruction of
the places of worship of the non-Muslims continued.
The barbaric tradition of atrocity set in
motion by the Prophet in the form a command for incessant Jihad against the
Kaffirs in the Koran, continued well into the late period of Ottoman caliphate.
Even the highly magnanimous and well-regarded caliph, like Harun-ur-Rashid
and his father al-Mamun were thoroughly brutal in dealing with the Jews, Christians
and pagans. The great caliph al-Mamun of the golden age of Islam, instituting
the heretic rationalistic Mutazili doctrine and non-divine nature of the Koran
as state policy, too, was extremely harsh when it comes to dealing with the
non-Muslim subjects. Under his rule in the 9th century, the pagans of Harran
had to choose between Islam and death. Such barbaric tools of forced conversion
of the infidels continued well into the late Ottoman period. Tavernier, the
17th century French traveler describes how in Anatolia "Everyday there
are numerous Greeks forced to become Turks".
Certain Western authors and historians believe
that after an early onslaught of Islamic conquests lasting until about the
mid-eighth century, violence subsided and relative calm and peace prevailed
throughout the Islamic world for the subsequent centuries [Saunders, J.J.
A History of Medieval Islam. London: Routledge, 1965; p79]. In truth, such
claims of relative peace for centuries fly in the face of it. In reality,
no period of the Islamic domination did ensure a peaceful life to the non-Muslims
subjects - thanks to Muslims' Jihadi campaigns in various forms, either by
the state or by the Muslim mobs. Yet, some Muslim rulers were tolerant towards
non-Muslim subjects in defiance of the Islamic injunctions. Islamic terror,
as was unleashed by the Prophet, comprised of unprovoked attack on the unwarned
and unprepared infidel territories, exiling or killing the adult male captives,
taking the females and children as captives (beautiful and young women were
used in the harem as sex-slaves, children for raising as Muslims and older
females for sale), looting and plundering the infidels of their valuable properties
and assets, imposing Jiziyah and of course, destroying the infidels' religious
institutions. Ibn Warraq, in "Why I am not a Muslims" [p. 219-240]
has listed the Islamic atrocities and violence against the infidels of various
sorts which I will summarized here.
7th Century
After Prophet Muhammad's emigration from Mecca
to Medina in 622, the exiling and extermination of 3 major Jewish tribes of
Medina by 628, has been described above. In 630, Muhammad marched into Mecca,
mercilessly captured, destroyed the most sacred pagan temple of Ka'ba and
established the Islamic rule there. The pagan inhabitants were given a choice
between death and Islam. To save lives, the pagans had no choice but to accept
Islam. On the same day, Khalid ibn Walid's massacre of the entire Jezima tribe
for not accepting Islam has already been discussed. Khalid ibn Walid, upon
command of Caliph Abu Bakr, launched the blood-letting wars of the apostasy
(Ridda) to submit those, who deserted Islam immediately after Muhammad's death,
back to the faith. The utter barbarity of Khalid Ibn Walid against the defeated
the Zoroastrian Persians at the Battle of Olayis in Southern Iraq in May 633,
whereby he created what is famously called the River of Death has been discussed
before.
After completing extermination/exiling the
Jews of Medina in 628, Muhammad launched a campaign against the wealthy and
prosperous Jewish community of Khaybar. He ordered his charges to destroy
all the Jewish temples as they came across. Having defeated the community,
he tortured the chief of tribe Kinana by setting fire on his chest to find
out the whereabouts of his treasures. After extracting the location of the
ensconced treasure, Kinana was beheaded, the treasures were looted, and Kinana's
wife Safiyah rendered as his share of the captive to be reduced to his sex-slave.
He married and took her to bed on the same night her husband's dead body awaited
burial on the next day. Incidentally, Safiyah's father belonged to the Banu
Quraiza tribe of Medina whom Muhammad had beheaded earlier.
In the Muslim campaign of 634, the entire
region between Gaza and Caesarea was devastated and four thousand peasants,
comprising of Christians, Jews and Samaritans, who were simply defending their
lands, were massacred. In 637, the Victorian Muslim army's march into Jerusalem,
with Caliph Omar at the lead, and the accompanying destruction of the synagogues
and burning of the churches, desecration of the Crosses and setting in the
Dhimmi laws of submission to the Jews and Christians of the Holy Land has
already been mentioned. In the expeditions against Mesopotamia between 635
and 643, monasteries were sacked, the monks slaughtered and Monophysite Arabs
executed or forced to convert. In Elam, all the people were put to the sword
and at Susa all the dignitaries suffered the same fate.
Details of conquest of Egypt starting with
the capture of Alexandria by Amr Ibn Al-As in 641 comes from the "Chronicle
of John" - the Bishop of Nikiu, written between 693 and 700 CE. As Amr
advanced into Egypt, he captured the city of Behnesa near Fayum, and exterminated
the inhabitants. Nobody was spared: surrendered or captured, Old or Young
or Women. Fayum and Aboit suffered the same fate. At Nikiu, the entire population
was put to the sword. The Arabs took the inhabitants to captivity. In Armenia,
the entire population of Euchaita was wiped out. Seventh century Armenian
chronicles recount how the Arabs decimated the population of Assyria and forced
a number of inhabitants to accept Islam and then wrought havoc in the districts
of Daron, southwest of Lake Van. In 642, it was the turn to town Dvin to suffer.
In 643, the Arabs came back with "extermination, ruin and slavery".
It was the same ghastly spectacle in North
Africa, Tripoli was pillaged in 643; Carthrage was razed to the ground and
most of its inhabitants were slaughtered. Michael, the Syrian describes how
the first Omayyad Caliph Muawiya, who took power in 661, sacked and pillaged
Cyprus and then established his domination by a "great massacre".
In the capture of Istakhar (Persia), 40,000 Iranians were slaughtered. Indeed,
Anatolia, Mesopotamia, Syria, Iraq, Iran and wherever Muslims have marched,
were presented with the same spectacle.
8th Century
In 712, Governor of Iraq, Hajjaj, ordered
the conquest of Sind under the commandership of his nephew, Muhammad bin Kasim.
He was instructed to "bring destruction on the unbelievers
[and]
to invite and induce the infidels to accept the true creed, and belief in
the unity of God
and whoever does not submit to Islam, treat him harshly,
and cause injury to him till he submits." According to Al-Biladuri, after
the capturing the port of Debal, the Muslim army slaughtered the inhabitants
over three days and the priests of the temples were massacred.
After the initial surge of cruelty, Kasim
became more tolerant and allowed the infidels to continue their profession
and religious practice. Learning about this sympathetic treatment, a furious
Hajjaj sent letter condemning Kasim's method of pardoning the infidels. It
read, "
The great god says in the Koran [47:7]: "O True believers,
when you encounter the unbelievers, strike off their heads." The above
command of the Great God is a great command and must be respected
. Henceforth,
grant pardon to no one of the enemy and spare none of them.." Kasim quickly
obliged to the divinely ordained command and on his capture of Brahmanabad,
he invited the infidel idol-worshipers to accept Islam. On latter's refusal,
he ordered all adult males be beheaded with swords and their women and the
children were captured as slaves. Eight thousands, some say 26,000, men were
put to the sword. One-fifth of the captured slaves (women and children), which
amounted to 20,000, amongst whom, were the daughters of Sind Chiefs along
with King Dahir's severed head, were sent to Hajjaj as the share of the states
and the remainder were distributed amongst the soldiers. [Chachanama, Muhammad
al-Kufi, trs Kalichbeg, I, 155; Shashi R Sharma, Caliphs and Sultans, p. 95].
The stream of captured slaves continued to flow from India to Baghdad ever
since Kassim captured Sind and Hajjaj alone is said to have forwarded 60,000
slaves from India (~1/5 of total) to the caliph Walid I (705-715 CE). [Chachnama,
I, 154]
In 704-705, Caliph Walid I gathered together
the nobles of Armenia in the Church of St. Gregory and in the Church of Xram
on the Araxis and burned them alive. The rest were crucified and their women
and children were captured as slaves. The worse happened to the Armenians
between 852 and 855. Over in Egypt, in 722, the surveyor Usama b. Zaid, attacked
convents and churches but Caliph Hisham later asked him to leave the Christians
alone. Caliph Marwan (ruled 744-750) looted and destroyed many monasteries
in Egypt while fleeing the Abbasid army. In the sacking of Euphesus in 781,
7,000 Greeks were taken captives were deported en masse.
9th century
In 853, Abbassid Caliph Mutawakil ordered
all new churches to be destroyed. In 884, the convent of Kalilshu in Baghdad
was destroyed. Caliph al-Mutasim, known as the Islamic hero, was a great wager
of holy wars against the Christians and heretics. After the capture and pillage
of Amorium in 838, there were so many captive slaves that Caliph al-Mutasim
ordered them to be auctioned in batches of five and ten. During the rule of
caliph al-Mamun - considered the most just Muslim ruler and harbinger of the
so-called "golden age of Islam" - the pagans of Harran had to choose
between Islam and death.
Ruined by the burden of imposition of Jizyah
tax, the Coptic Christians of Lower Egypt revolted in 832. This revolt was
ruthlessly suppressed by the Muslim rulers in which Christian villages, vineyards,
gardens and Churches were burned. There were mass slaughter and those spared
were deported.
10th century
In 924, the Church and convent of Mary in
Damascus was plundered and burned and other churches destroyed. Further destruction
occurred in Ramleh, Ascalon, Tinnis, and Egypt during the invasion of Asad
ud Din Shirkuh. In the capture and sacking of Thessalonica in 903 CE, 22,000
Christian captives were divided amongst the Arab chieftains or sold into slavery.
[Ibn Warraq,
There were massacres of the Spanish Christians
in and around Seville. Al-Hakim biamr Illah gave orders that the Churches
of his dominions should be destroyed. A Muslim historian records that over
30,000 churches built by the Greeks in Egypt, Syria and elsewhere were destroyed,
their contents seized and sold in the markets and lands confiscated. [Tritton
AS, The Caliphs and their non-Muslim Subjects. London, 1970, p. 54].
In Iran, the Zoroastrians faced frequent forced
conversion, pressure to do so and persecution which lead to riots in Shiraz
in 979. To escape persecution, they immigrated to India and live there even
today as a respected community.
11th century
Six thousand Jews were massacred in Fez of
Morocco in 1033. Hundreds of Jews were killed between 1010 and 1013 near Cordoba
and other parts of Muslim Spain and an entire Jewish community of 4000 in
Grenada was annihilated in 1066. Fatimid caliph Hakim's jealous persecution
of non-Muslims and Church demolition resulted in the destruction of the Church
of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem in 1009. He also banned the pilgrimage
to the Holy Land. Both events acted as the major causes that ignited the Crusades.
In Kairoun (Tunisia), the Jews were persecuted
and sent to exile in 1016, who later returned, only to be expelled again.
In Tunis, they were forced to convert or leave. During subsequent decades,
there were fierce anti-Jewish persecutions throughout Tunisia.
In 1064, the Seljuk Sultan, Alp Arslan, devastated
Georgia and Armenia. Those, whom he did not take captive, were executed. [Ibn
Warraq, pp. 218-238]
Eleventh century also saw the barbaric assault
of Sultan Mahmud of Ghazni on Hindustan starting in 1000 CE. He launched 17
plundering, looting and slave-taking expeditions to India. Abu Nasr Muhammad
Utbi, Sultan Mahmud's secretary, gloats in his official chronicle that after
attacking Waihind in November 1001 CE, Mahmud's army slaughtered 15,000 fighting
men in "splendid action" before capturing 500,000 men and women
as slaves. In Mahmud's attack of Ninduna and Panjab in 1014, "slaves
were so plentiful that they became very cheap and the men of respectability
in their native land were degraded by becoming slaves of ordinary shop-keepers
(in Ghazni)". The extent of barbarity of Sultan Mahmud was vividly described
by contemporary Muslim historians. In the attack on Thanesar, "the blood
of the infidels flowed so copiously the stream was discolored and the people
were unable to drink it". Similarly in the slaughter of Sirsawa near
Saharanpur, "the Musalmans paid no regard to the booty till they had
satiated themselves with the slaughter of infidels." [Utbi, Tehrik-i-Yamini,
ED, Vol II, pp 41-42, 49-50]. When Mahmud learned that the famous Hindu temple
at Somnath housed a monolith brought of the temple of Ka'ba that was destroyed
by the Prophet of Islam in 630 CE, out of jealous piety, he rushed to destroy
the Somnath temple. Hindus in great numbered assembled to protect their sacred
temple and offered Mahmud great booty, which he ignored and according to Ibn
Asir [Kamil-ut-Tawarikh], he massacred 50,000 Hindus guarding temple and destroyed
it.
12th Century
In the 12th century, the Almohads of North
Africa spread terror wherever they went. The Jews in Yemen were given choice
of death or conversion to Islam in 1165. Similar choice was given to the Jews
of Aden in 1198. According to Stillman [The Jews of Arab Lands], there were
forced conversions of Jews under the Almohad caliphs, al-Mumin (d 1165), Abu
Yakub (d 1184) and al-Mansur (d 1199). The Christians of Grenada were deported
to Morocco by the Almoravids rulers in 1126.
In the Indian front, after the scourge of
Mahmud Ghazni, there was a relative calm until Turk Ghaurid Sultan Muhammad
Ghauri started his attacks beginning in 1175. When he became successful in
1192 to defeat Prithviraj Chauhan, he launched a scourge of conquest of Sirsuti,
Samana, Khuhram and Hansi with ruthless slaughter and a general destruction
of temples and their replacement with mosques. Similar events followed in
Ajmer and Delhi later on [KS Lal, Theory and Practice of Muslim State in India,
p. 21].
Muhammad Ghauri's lieutenant Qutbuddin Aibak,
succeeded him to become the first Muslim Sultan in India. He dispatched Ikhtiyaruddin
Bakhtiyar Khalji to the East and himself concentrated in Hindustan proper.
He captured Kol (modern Aligarh) in 1194. There "those of the garrison
who were wise and cute were converted to Islam, but those who stood by their
ancient faith were slain with the sword." [Hasan Nizami, Taj-ul-Maasir,
E.D., H, 222]
In 1195 when Raja Bhim was attacked by Aibak,
he captured 20,000 slaves.
13th Century
In Aibak's attack of Kalinjar in 1202, 50,000
slaves were captured. "The temples were converted into mosques,"
writes Hasan Nizami, "and the voices of the summoners to prayer ascended
to the highest heavens, and the very name of idolatry was annihilated."
Muhammad Farishtah specifically mentions that during the capture of Kalinjar
"fifty thousand kaniz va ghulam, having suffered slavery, were rewarded
with the honor of Islam" - which meant that enslaved captives were forced
into conversion to Islam and conversion accelerated the growth of Muslim population
in India.
During Aibak's rule of 20 Lunar years, he
captured Hansi, Meerut, Delhi, Ranthambhor and Kol, which accompanied similar
massacres, destruction and slave-taking. When Sultan Muizzuddin personally
mounted a campaign against Hindustan, Aibak proceeded as far as Peshawar to
meet him, and the two together attacked the Khokhar (Hindu) stronghold in
the Koh-i-Jud or the Salt Range. The Hindus (Khokhars) fled to the highest
in the mountains. They were pursued. Those that escaped the sword fled to
the dense depth of the jungle; others were massacred or taken captive. The
result was a great plunder and many captives sold as slaves. According to
Farishtah 300 to 400 hundred thousand Khokhars were converted to Islam by
Muizzuddin.
Under Aibak most of Hindustan from Delhi to
Gujarat, Lakhnauti to Lahore and Bihar to Bengal were brought under the sway
of the Turks. In every attack great many people were killed and large number
of women and children were captured as slaves. In 1202 CE, Ikhtiyaruddin Bakhtiyar
Khalji marched into Bihar and attacked the University centers at Nalanda,
Vikramshila and Uddandpur. The Buddhist monks and Brahmans, identified by
shaved head, taken as idolaters, were massacred and the common people were
captured and enslaved. Ibn Asir says that Qutbuddin Aibak made 'war against
the provinces of Hind. He killed many, and returned with prisoners and booty."
In Banaras, according to the same author, "the slaughter of the Hindus
was immense; none was spared except women and children". Fakhr-i-Mudabbir
informs us that as a result of the Turkish achievements under Muizzuddin and
Aibak, even poor (Muslim) householder became owner of numerous slaves."
Following Aibak, Sultan Iltutmish, (rule 1210-1236),
he continued with his war against the infidels and revolting territories including
Ranthambhor (1226), Mandor (near Jodhpur), Gwalior and Ujjan (1234-35). According
to contemporary chroniclers Minhaj Shiraj and Muhammad Farishtah, every campaign
lead to general massacres of those who resisted and the women and children
were taken captives and assets of the infidels were looted.
Minhaj Siraj writes that Ulugh Khan Balban's
"taking of captives and his capture of the dependents of the great Ranas
cannot be recounted". Talking of his war in Avadh against Trailokyavarman
of the Chandela dynasty (Dalaki va Malaki of Minhaj), the chronicler says
that "All the infidels' wives, sons and dependents
and children
fell into the hands of the victors." In 1253, in his campaign against
Ranthambhor also, Balban enslaved many people. In 1259, in an attack on Haryana,
many women and children were enslaved. Twice Balban led expeditions against
Kampil, Patiali, and Bhojpur, and in the process enslaved a large number of
women and children. In Katehar he ordered a general massacre of the male population
of over eight years of age and carried away women and children. In 1260 CE,
Ulugh Khan Balban marched with a large force on a campaign in the region of
Ranthambhor, Mewat and Siwalik. He made a proclamation that a soldier who
brought a live captive would be rewarded with two silver tankahs and one who
brought the head of a dead one would get one silver tankah. Soon 300-400 living
and dead were brought to his presence everyday.
Like Balban, other commanders of Iltutmish,
or the "Shamsia Maliks of Hind" were marching up and down the Hindustan,
raiding towns and villages and enslaving people. This was the situation prevailing
from Lakhnauti to Lahore and from Ajmer to Ujjain. The Hindus used to reclaim
their lands after the Muslim invaders had passed through them with fire and
sword, and Turkish armies used to repeat their attacks to regain control of
the cities so lost. But the captives once taken became slaves and then Musalmans
for ever. The exact figures of such slaves have not been mentioned and therefore
cannot be computed. All that is known is that they were captured in droves.
After the Iltutmish Sultans, war against the
Hindu infidels and slave-taking received further momentum under the Khaljis.
Sultan Jalaluddin Khalji (1290-1296) launched ruthless attacks against Hindus
in Katehar, Ranthambhor, Malwa, and Gwalior. According to Amir Khasrau [Miftah-ul-Fatuh],
he sacked temples, took booty and captured slaves making a "Hell of Paradise".
Next Sultan Alauddin Khalji, a great war maker,
sent a large army to Gujarat in 1299 in which all the major towns were sacked,
temples destroyed, wealth looted and large number of slaves of both sexes
captured [Khwaja AM Isami, Futu-us-Salatin, p. 243 ; Ziauddin Barani, Tarikh-i-Firoz
Shahi, pp. 251-52].
Away from the Indian front, the Christians
of Damascus were killed or sold into slavery and their Churches were burned
down. Sir Steven Runciman records Sultan Baibars promised the safety of the
garrison of Safed if they surrendered to the Muslims. When they surrendered,
the Muslims fell upon the population and massacred them. At the capture of
Antioch by the Muslims, "Even the Muslim Chroniclers were shocked by
the carnage that followed", says Runciman. The Jews of Marrakesh were
massacred in 1232. Following this, the Jews of Morocco were persecuted, forced
to convert or leave. The Jews of Tabriz were obliged to convert in 1291 CE
[Ibn Warraq; p. 227]
14th Century
The riots of 1321 in Cairo, in which several
churches were destroyed, which in turn, set on destruction of churches throughout
Egypt resulting in desecration of more than 50 churches. The Jews of Tabriz
were again made to convert to Islam in 1318 CE and those of Baghdad in 1333
and 1344.
Late 14th and the early 15th centuries witnessed
the horrible barbarity of Amir Tamur (aka, Tamurlane). Information about Timur
comes mainly from "Zafer Nama" written during early 15th century
and his own diary, Mulfuzat-i-Timuri, which are full of Koranic references
in justification of his invasions, wars and mass murdered and destructions.
He set out on his campaign in 1399 against India solely because the Muslim
rulers were too lenient towards the idolater Hindu subjects. By the time,
he reached Delhi; he had gathered around 100,000 pagan captives. A few thousands
artisans and clever mechanics, including builders and stone masons, were taken
back to Samarkhand while the rest were massacred in a single day [Mulfuzat-i-Timuri,
trs ED, III, 447]. He built victory pillars with the severed heads of the
infidels. On his way out of India, he pillaged Miraj, pulled down the monuments
and flayed the Hindu inhabitants alive. [Why I am Not a Muslim, ibn Warraq,
p. 234-235].
In the Indian front, Sultan Allauddin Khaliji
(1296-1316) continued his terrorizing massacre, slave-taking and looting mission
in the early 14th century, which made him the greatest rulers of the so-called
Sultanate period (c 1200-1500 CE). In the sack of reconstituted Somnath temple
a second, Wassaf recounts that the Muslim army captured 20,000 women and children
as salves. [Wassaf, Bk IV, p. 448]. In 1301 Ranthambhor was attacked and in
1303, Chittor. In the Chittor attack 30,000 people were massacred in cold
blood [Khazain, Habib trs p 49], and women and children were taken captives.
Similar things happened in the attack of Malwa, Sevana and Jalor (1305-1311).
According to Shams Shiraj Afif in the days of the Khaljis, "the Turks,
whenever they please, can sieze, buy or sell any Hindu." [Nuh Sephr,
trs, in ED III, 561]. No wonder that 50,000 slave boys were engaged in his
personal services and 70,000 slaves worked continuously in his buildings.
Ziauddin Barani describes the continuous arrival of batches of slaves in the
markets of Delhi and elsewhere.
Following the Khaljis, the Tughlaqs ascended
to the Sultanate and they outstripped the notorious Khaljis in making wars
against the Hindus and enslaving them. Shihabuddin Ahmed Abbas writes of Muhammad
Tughtaq, "The Sultan never ceases to show the greatest zeal in making
war upon the infidels
Everyday, thousands of slaves are sold at a very
slow price, so great is the number of prisoners". [Masalik-ul-Absar,
E.D. III, 580]. He subjugated as far as Dwarsamudra, Malabar, Kampil, Warangal,
Lakhnauti, Stagaon, Sonargaon, Nagarkat and Sambhal amongst the prominent
places. [Qaraunab Turks, 96, 126, 129-30, 173]. He also ruthlessly put down
16 major rebellions. In each campaign, after defeat and massacre of the opponent,
slaves were captured with gusto. The famous Muslim traveler Ibn Battutah testifies
that in the defeat of Halajun rebellion (of Lahore), the capture of the women
of the rebels were sent to the far-off Gwalior fort whom Battutah had seen
there. [Battutah, p. 123]. The Tughlaqs would capture the Hindu slaves round
the years, convert them to Muslims and on the two Eid-days, he will marry
them off according to the Islamic tradition. [Battutah, p. 63].
Firoz Tughlaq, who ascended to the throne
in 1351, outstripped his father and grandfather so much so that by all kind
of methods and means, he acquired 180,000 of them. Contemporary Shams Shiraj
Afif further testifies that during Firoz Tughlaq "Slaves became too numerous"
and that the institution took root in every centre of the country. [Afif,
pp. 267-273]. Firoz Tughloq was known to be relatively kind-hearted of the
Sultans and yet according to Afif he killed 180,000 Bengalis in his expedition
in Bengal and had erected a Tower of skulls [Lal, p. 73].
15th Century
Amir Timur's barbarism continued in the 15th
century. In 1400, Timur devastated the country in and around Tifflis. In 1403,
he returned to Tifflis to devastate the country again and destroyed the 700
large villages and minor towns, massacred the inhabitant and razed the Churches
to the ground. Amir Timur thoroughly and systematically destroyed the Christians
and as a result, the Nestorians and Jacobites of Mesopotamia have never recovered.
At Sivas, 4,000 Christians were buried alive; at Tus, there were 10,000 victims.
Historians estimate the number of dead at Saray to be 100,000; at Baghdad
90,000 and at Isfahan 70,000 [Why I am Not a Muslim, Ibn Warraq, pp. 234-235].
Over in Constantinople, Sultan Mehemet unleashed
utter barbarism. When Constantinople fell to the Muslim army, the Sultan allowed
his soldiers to massacre the population for three days. They poured into the
city and slew every men, women and children they met in the streets [Ruchimen,
The Fall of Constantinople, 1453, p. 145].
16th Century:
The Muslim Sultanate of India became divided
into a few largely independent territories under different Muslim rulers during
much of the 15th century, although the condition of the Hindus never changed.
War against the Hindu community continued along with capture of slaves for
selling. Then came Zahiruddin Muhammad Babur, a descendent of the barbaric
Amir Timur, who defeated the fanatic Sikandar Lodi in 1526 and instituted
the Mogul rule (1525 - 1707) in India. Babur, an orthodox Muslim, continued
the Jihadi wars against the Hindu dominated regions of India. He continued
with the destruction of the Hindu temples, the prominent example is the much
controversial Babri Mosque in Ayodhya. Babur's determination to exterminate
the vestiges of Hindu idolatry was explicitly narrated in his own diary before
battle against Rana Sanga. Babur wrote in Jihadi zeal, "I made public
the resolution to abstain from wine. My servants
dashed upon the earth,
the flagons and the cups. They dashed them into pieces as God willing, soon
will be dashed, the Gods of the idolaters" [Babur Nama, Vol II, p. 554-5].
Babur and his soldiers destroyed Hindu temples in many parts of the country.
[Babur Nama, Vol II, p. 340]. After winning the War against Rana Sangha, Babur
ordered the set-up of a Tower of slaughtered pagan heads as a trophy for the
victory. Similar tower of dead pagan heads was created after the victory at
Chanderi against Medini Rai [Baburnama, pp. 483-84, 596]
However, the misery and persecution of Hindu
and other non-Muslims eased up a little bit after emperor Akbar came to the
throne in 1656, who abolished discrimination, including Jizya, against the
Hindus despite severe displeasure and protests from the Ulema and Muslims
in general. However, persecution against the Hindus continued in various forms,
especially his extreme eagerness and success in capturing the lands under
the non-Muslim control. In the attack of Rana Pratap Singh in Rajastan, when
the news of defeat of the Rajputs reached the palace, a few hundred noble
women set fire on themselves to commit Jauher, in order to avoid being captured
at the hands of Akbar's lustful soldiers. Akbar accumulated a mind-boggling
5,000 women in his harem through various means.
17th Century
The Jews of Yemen were forced to choose between
death and conversion in 1678. In 1617 and 1622, the Jews of Persia were declared
apostates and suffered a wave of forced conversion and persecution. During
the reign of Shah Abbas II (1642-1666), all the Jews of Persia were forced
to convert, between 1653 and 1666. Taverniar, the 17th century French traveler,
records as to how in Anatolia, "Everyday there were numerous Greeks who
are forced to become Turks".
Over in Persia, the persecution of the Zoroastrians
got worse in the 17th century. Persecutions included levying extra hefty taxes,
frequent looting of their homes and properties, forcing them to wear distinctive
clothing, prohibiting building new houses or repairing old ones.
In Indian front, following Akbar's death,
the semblance of equality that was instituted, started a reversal by his own
son Jahanghir, which further worsened under Shahjahan. Jahangir writes that
500-600 thousand people were killed during the rule of Akbar and Jahangir.
However, it was all undone when Akbar's great grandson Aurangzeb ascended
throne in 1658. He instituted Islamic Sharia as the ruling principle, reintroduced
Jizya and launched a Jihadi campaign of forced conversion of the non-Muslims
and destruction of non-Muslim religious institution. When Sikh Guru went to
Aurangzeb's palace to inquire about forced conversion of the Hindus of Kashmir,
he was tortured and executed in 1675. Aurangzeb's rule saw destruction of
nearly 10,000 Hindu, Jain and Buddhist temples. In the campaign of 1679-1680,
123 temples were destroyed in Udaipur, 63 in Chittor, 66 in Jaipur [Ibn Warraq,
p. 224]. After defeating and taking Maratha king Sambhuraj and his minister
Kavikalash prisoner, their eyes were extracted, tongue were cut off and after
a fortnight's torture, their limbs were hacked one by one and thrown to the
dogs (1689). [Lal, p. 75]
18th Century
Persecution of the Zoroastrians continued
in the 18th century so much so that their numbers "declined disastrously
due to combined effects of massacres, forced conversions, and emigration"
[Encyclopedia of Islam, Ed II].
The Jews of Jedda were expelled between 1770
and 1786, who flew to Yemen. In 1790, Jews were massacred in Tetuan (Morocco).
Aurangzeb's policy of persecution and destruction
of temples continued in the early 18th century until he died in 1707.
19th Century
In Persia there was forced conversion of Jews
in 1839. According the Bernard Lewis, there was also forced conversion of
Persian Jews in the 1840s.
In 1828, Jews of Baghdad were massacred.
In 1834, a cycle of violence and pillage began against the Jews and their
properties in Safed. In 1839, massacre of Jews occurred in Meshed (Iran).
The survivors had to suffer forced conversion. A massacre of the Jews took
place in Barfurush in 1867. In 1840, the Jews of Damascus were suffered the
first in a series of blood libels in many cities. Other outbreaks of violence,
murder and pillage of the Jews and their properties occurred in Morocco, Tunisia,
Libya and the Arab countries.
Starting in the 7th century, the Armenian
Christians suffered terribly in the 19th century. The Turks massacred about
250,000 Armenian Christians in 1894-1896 in a planned and methodical design.
General pillage was unleashed. Villages were burned and hundreds of Churches
were plundered.
The Zoroastrians faced increased persecution
too, such that they were living in complete insecurity and poverty in the
19th century.
20th Century
Massacre of the Armenians continued in the
early 20th century. In 1904 and in 1909 CE, about 30,000 Armenians were slaughtered
in Adana. The most horrible mass murder of Armenians occurred in 1915, which
can be rightly described the first genocide of the 20th century. More than
1,000,000 (one million) Armenians were systematically massacred - thousands
were shot to death, drowned (included Children), thrown over the cliffs and
the survivors were deported or reduced to slavery - which served as the model
for Hitler's massacre of the Jews in the WW-II.
There is clear evidence of slavery persisting
in Saudi Arabia and the Yemen even in the 1950s. A report in a French Magazine
in the 1990s gave an estimate of 45,000 Blacks are being kidnapped by the
Muslims to be sold in slavery in the Gulf states and the middle east [L Vie,
no.2562, Oct 6, 1994].
Islam a legacy of incessant Jihad since it
inception
To this long list of Islamic violence, we
have to add another major incidence, termed 'Dewshirme' which was instituted
by the Ottoman Sultan Orkhan in 1330. Following the Prophet's tradition of
one-fifth of the booty captured from the infidels belonging to the State,
Dewshrime consisted of periodic collection of one-fifth of the Christian children
over 7 years of age as the property of the state. The Christian parents, belonging
to Greek aristocracy, the Serbs, Bulgarians, Armenians, and Albanians, were
obligated to surrender 1/5th of their children to the state every four years.
They were converted to Islam and trained as soldiers so that they can wage
war against their own blood-brothers in their adulthood. Some scholars say
12,000 while other claim 8,000 children were collected every year under this
scheme.
The Jihadi campaign Muhammad had initiated
in the 620s until his death in 632, there was not a single period of let-up
ever since until this day as accounted in the above chronology. The account
of violence, persecution and massacre listed above are only a tip of the iceberg
that has occurred to the non-Muslim subjects under the Muslim conquest and
rule. Only the prominent events were recorded by the contemporary historians
and chroniclers and royal secretaries. While there are numerous other violent
incidences which the chroniclers have cited with few details and are hard
to make a grasp of the extent of death, destruction and enslavement in those
cases.
The Silent Persecution
Another serious form of persecution of the
non-Muslims in Muslim countries has received little attention that requires
mention. I will discuss it in the context of moderate Muslim countries like
Bangladesh and Pakistan which will apply to minorities of all Muslim countries
across the globe. The post-separation Hindu population in 1947 stood at 30%
in Bangladesh (East Bengal until 1971) and 15% in Pakistan. However, the current
Hindu population stands at ~10% in Bangladesh and at ~1% in Pakistan. On the
other hand, the proportion of the Muslim population in Hindu-dominated India
has increased instead.
This massive exodus of Hindu population from
Bangladesh (East Bengal) and Pakistan represent a grave and yet unnoticed
and uncared for persecution of the minorities in Muslim countries. In recent
time, multiple reports in news media have given accounts of how the Hindus
and other minorities are being forced to convert to Islam in Pakistan. Living
in subcontinent, I have witnessed how a Hindu person, having lands and properties
next to an influential Muslim village leader, would be harassed by the latter
such that the latter would be forced to sell the land to the village leader
and leave the country in humiliation. He would not be allowed to sell his
lands to a third party and finally have to surrender the land to the Muslim
leader at highly reduced priced than that on the market.
The second form of persecution that leads
to exodus of Hindus is the rape of the Hindu girls and women by the Muslims
in the locality. Indeed, there is a massive rape of Hindu women which is hardly
reported to the media and the law agencies. Of the nearly a dozen good-looking
women I have known personally and from nearby, about 75% of them were raped
by the Muslims - which came to my knowledge from various confidential sources.
Surprisingly, as I was told of these stories when I was a believing Muslim,
such horrible incidences would not strike our conscience with sadness and
guilt but instead would make raunchy and enjoyable pieces of gossips. The
general attitude is that it is OK to rape Hindu girls or they deserve to be
humiliated by Muslims.
In a conservative society of the subcontinent,
the rape of a woman is seen as a great dishonor and humiliation to the victim's
party, not to the rapist, which often bring life-long suffering. This social
constraint compels most of such rape cases secret by the victim and her family
and relatives if possible. In case where the victims seeks to report them
to the law agency, there are threat of violence and death on the victim and
her family members which further lead to under reporting of the rapes of the
Hindu women in these countries. More importantly, a respectable father would
never like to see his daughter gets raped and would like to escape the chances
at any cost so long there is a means. Indeed, having been blessed with a beautiful
daughter is the greatest headache of the Hindu parents in these countries,
especially in the countryside. I have seen how the Hindu parents rush to marry
off their daughter at an early age, when the girl is a beautiful one. In many
cases, parents send their beautiful daughters to India at an early age for
studies. The main purpose is to keep them out of the reach of the Muslims,
where they normally get married and never return to home country.
The other kind of the persecution is the
kidnapping the young Hindu girl by Muslim men who like them and rape, forcefully
marry and convert them to Islam (http://www.hinduhumanrights.org/Pakistan/index.htm).
As a growing-up Muslim, I have witnessed the general notion amongst the Muslims
that if you can convert Hindu (or non-Muslim) to Islam through marriage or
whatsoever means, Allah will grant paradise to you and your past seven generations
in the afterlife. Hence, if there is a beautiful girl in the neighborhood,
there is a general feeling amongst the young Muslim boys that it will be auspicious
to somehow marry this girl and convert her to Islam to achieve a passport
to paradise to your seven generation. There is no greater way to serve to
your parent, grandparents and so on. This tendency often encourages Muslim
youths to take recourse of kidnapping the Hindu girls they like with assistance
from illegal gangs, marry them under coercion and convert them to Islam.
These constraints and difficulties keep minorities
in a state of continuous mental persecution, which they can neither complain
about, nor bear with. Those who have nominal means make a journey across the
border to the other side to India to secure the safer and honorable future
to the subsequent generations. These kinds of silent or soft persecution,
that result in such massive exodus and displacement of minority population
from their ancestral home in silence to wherever they can to acquire better
safety, constitutes a much graver form of persecution than the much publicized
terrorism and suicide bombing.
If we consider that Hindu birthrate is similar
as Muslims in Bangladesh/East Pakistan, a reduction of Hindus from 30% to
10% since 1947 means there have been an effectively displacement of massive
30 million Hindu people from Bangladesh, given current Bangladesh population
stands at 150 millions. And this silent terrorizing and persecution has never
received much attention nor termed terrorism, which indeed a tactical form
of religious terrorism/persecution. And this kind of persecution continues
in Pakistan and Bangladesh without respite and with increasing zeal.
This kind of soft terrorism occurs on the
non-Muslim population in most Muslim-dominated countries. Given that Bangladesh
and Pakistan are considered rather moderate Muslim countries, in more fundamentalist
Islamic countries, this soft-terrorism is likely to be stronger. However,
in every country, such persecution does not necessarily result in exodus of
the non-Muslims, since there may not be countries that are willing to give
shelter like India unofficially did to the Hindus of Bangladesh and Pakistan.
It should be fathomed that this kind of grave
and yet unnoticed and unreported soft-terrorism by Muslims continues on such
massive scales even in today's world of justice, massive media reporting,
obligation for respecting human rights, equality of all citizens and pressures
from a whole groups of international bodies, powerful democratic countries
and rights groups. Hence, such soft-terrorism, persecution and other forms
of smaller scale violence against the non-Muslim subjects have continued incessantly
throughout the entire period of Islamic conquest, domination and rule. The
chronological details of the Islamic violence, terrorism and persecution listed
above would only form a fraction of the real total.
There should not be any doubt by now that
since late 620s, the violence that was initiated by Prophet Muhammad had continued
without respite ever since although there may have been some depressions along
the way. There must have also been changes in the means of carrying out such
terrorism and violence. However, there is one notable difference. The terrorism
perpetrated by the Muslims since the early days of Islam to until the early
19th century was perpetrated by the Muslim states. Indeed, it is an obligation
of the Islamic state to uphold and carry on the propagation of Islam through
violence or whatsoever means as was unleashed by Prophet Muhammad as head
of a nascent Islamic state. However, since those much more devastating terrorism
and violence were perpetrated by the Muslims states, they are not being recognized
as terrorism.
However, the state-terrorism of Islam was
brought to an end mainly by the British which came to a virtual end when Kemal
Ataturk of Turkey dissolved Islamic caliphate in 1924 and introduced secularism.
Although there has been a lull in the overt form of terrorism since then for
several decades, the soft form of Islamic terrorism has continued as reflected
in the steady decline of Hindu population in Pakistan and Bangladesh since
1947.
The development on the world stage especially
after the WW-II, such as the formation of UN, various human rights bodies
etc. have changed the ways and means of individual states. Thus although many
Muslim countries got back their sovereignty after the WW-II from the former
European colonialists, the Governments have been bounded up with all sorts
of obligation and treaties that demands respectable treatment of the citizens
of any states, irrespective of race, religion and color. Thus the Governments
of the Muslim states are unable to re-launch the same type of overt terrorism
and violence against the non-Muslims as used to be done in India in the days
of bin Kasim, Sultan Mahmud, the Khaljies, the Tughlaqs etc. Hardly have the
Muslim Governments failed to unleash overt terrorism to dominate and expand
the Islamic religion, it has changed hands from the state-body to underground
fringe groups at the gap of just 3-4 decades. The innovation and easy availability
of guns, bombs, rockets, missiles and other modern weapons and Muslim terrorist
groups' ruthless usages of them have added further prominence to the present
scourge of Islamic violence.
Although Islamic terrorism started a surge
in the 1980s in India, there was little recognition if it as terrorism. But
instead, a great part of the Eastern and Western world recognized it as independence
movement by Kashmiri Muslims. It was a legitimate movement for self-determination.
Then there started terrorism in Chechnya, which again much of the world recognized
as legitimate independence movement by the Muslims of Chechnya.
Although there have been isolated terror attacks
on Western (mainly US) targets and nationals over the last couple of decades,
they have occurred mainly in overseas location, such as, in Lebanon, Yemen
and Kenya etc. These terrorist acts, despite being of big impact, did not
get its deserving label of Islamic terrorism until the attack of 9/11 in New
York. Further uncovering of terrorist cells all across the Western world has
further heightened concerns and media-hype of Islamic terrorism over the last
couple of years.
The bottom-line is that Islamic terrorism
that we see today is not a new phenomenon. It has occurred continuously since
the 7th century institution of the Islamic faith. The only difference is that
throughout the Islamic history, the onus of terrorizing the non-Muslims were
undertaken by the Islamic states. The ferocity, destruction and violation
have been of much greater scales in the Islamic rulers' devastating attack
of innocent infidel territories and out-posts, slaughtering both military
and civilian population (mainly men) in tens of thousands, enslaving their
children and women in great multitude and destroying their religious institutions
and forcing them to conversion. The present scourge of terrorist atrocity
is virtually negligible as compared to those unleashed by the Islamic rulers
on the infidels throughout the Islamic history. Just because the tentacles
of Islamic terrorism have reached the Western world - it has become such a
hype in the last few years post-9/11.
Suggested Reading:
Ibn Warraq, Why I am Not a Muslim
KS Lal, Muslim Slave System in Medieval India
KS Lal, Theory and Practice of Muslim State
in India
Shashi R Sharma, Caliphs & Sultans - Religious
Ideology and Political Praxis
Benjamin Walker, Foundations of Islam