Hindu Vivek Kendra
A RESOURCE CENTER FOR THE PROMOTION OF HINDUTVA
   
 
 
«« Back
Institutionalising corruption through rural job scheme?

Institutionalising corruption through rural job scheme?

Author: Swapan DasGupta
Publication: The Free Press Journal
Date: August 22, 2005
URL: http://www.samachar.com/features/220805-features.html

Now that we have waved our little tricolours on Independence Day and got all inspired by Aamir Khan doing his Mangal Pandey number, Parliament of India is going to meekly acquiesce in one of the most brazen acts of national subversion. I am referring to a legislation that in all fairness should be called the Corruption Guarantee Scheme rather than the Rural Employment Guarantee Act (REGA).

The most incredible feature of this planned drain of wealth from the productive sector to the underground economy is that no one knows how much is at stake. The conservative estimate is that it will cost Rs 40,000 crore to provide 100 days of alleged work to 40 lakh people. Others suggest that the costs could go up to as much as Rs 1,50,000 crore. The economist Bibek Debroy, whose institutional affiliation does disservice to his professional competence, has even suggested that the costs of servicing REGA could be around Rs 2,08, 000 crore per year. We are not talking loose change, there is serious money involved!

REGA is said to be the pipedream of Sonia Gandhi. Egged on by some wild-Left faculty members of Jawaharlal Nehru University and some anti-globalisation activists who make a living out of poverty, she has decided REGA-which will no doubt be renamed in due course after a Gandhi-is her way of perpetuating the populist legacy of Indira Gandhi. REGA represents the high point of the Congress president's lady bountiful act.

The consequences will be catastrophic. In 1987, Rajiv Gandhi rued the fact that less than 15 per cent of every rupee spent on anti-poverty programmes reached the actual beneficiaries. Studies of numerous welfare schemes initiated by the Centre and state governments suggest that there is no reason to revise the former prime minister's assessment. "The record of anti-poverty programmes in India", writes Jean Dreze, one of those jholawala experts behind REGA, "is far from encouraging."

Referring to his own study of the Food for Work programme, Dreze admits that "much of (its) potential has been wasted due to widespread corruption." Outlook magazine quotes Planning Commission sources that West Bengal, "despite its self-positioning as a worker's paradise, has one of the worst records in wage schemes, as the party cadre are in complete control of the beneficiary list." Anti-poverty programmes end up as the state funding of political expenditure of the Comrades.

The apprehensions are not right-wing alarmism. They are based on rational assessments of the flawed delivery systems available to the Government. If casual journalistic inquiries could straight away expose a Rs 9-crore scam in the the Maharashtra Employment Guarantee Scheme in just one district, we can only speculate the amount of leakage in a national scheme to dig holes and fill them again.

If this is the dismal track record, why is the Government embarking on a scheme that will inevitably entail fresh doses of taxation and an erosion of India's competitiveness? Why is the National Advisory Council contemplating another cess on income and services that will fund welfare schemes for some 30 crore workers in the unorganised sector? What is the rationale behind the high-tax, high-approach of the Government that is guaranteed to nullify India's emergence as an economic power house?

On the face of it, the Congress is merely translating its avowed concern for the aam aadmi (common person). However, Dreze gives the game away. A "strong national (R)EGA", he writes, is likely to lead to a flourishing of activist organisations that would help mobilise the poor in their interest. It is a political initiative." Cut out the sophistry and here is one of the regime's favourite jholawala economists admitting that REGA is just a ruse to nurture countless NGOs that can be put to the service of the Congress and Left during elections.

Dreze's sincerity is unquestioned and his concern is to create more NGOs. What he ignores is that the Congress is not all about grassroots self-initiative. As a party, the Congress is built on a network of patronage. Earlier, it was the public sector that ensured an unending supply of funds. Today, the focus has shifted to a mega-scheme that will be funded by the productive sectors of the economy.

For the past 14 months, India is witnessing the creeping deterioration of its productive infrastructure. The July 26 deluge in Mumbai was perhaps the most dramatic manifestation of things going horribly wrong. But it is the same story in Hyderabad and Bangalore cities that are being showcased as the future of a knowledge-based India. Since the BJP's India Shining campaign ended in disaster in May 2004, it has become impolitic to advocate the fasttrack to economic prosperity.

Despite the Prime Minister's proforma promise to transform Mumbai into Shanghai and the Finance Minister's measured assurances about the future, there are good reasons to believe that the steady gains made since the mid-1990s may be dissipated. Just witness the contempt with which the political class dismissed well-intentioned pleas of Mumbai citizens to plough back a fraction of the Rs 40,000 crore the city contributes in taxes. As things stand today, the total government investment on Mumbai is around Rs 1,000 crore or only 2.5 per cent of what it contributes.

What is ominous is the direction of political economy. For all its other shortcomings, the NDA Government was broadly committed to gradually scaling down government and lowering taxation. Yashwant Sinha was, in fact, removed as Finance Minister in 2003 because he wanted to reverse the direction. In 14 months, the UPA Government has reversed both these trends. Under the cover of the Common Minimum Programme, it has gleefully embraced a high-tax and highspend approach to economic management.

The subtext of the Rs 1,74,000 crore the Government wants to spend in the next four years on Bharat Nirman is that India is going to drift into the high-tax zone. That's because all the money we already pay as taxes is going into financing the next election campaign for the Congress and the Left.

It's a sad tale. In REGA we are not only witnessing the institutionalisation of corruption, we are witnessing decision- making pass into the hands of those who have no stake in the future of India. Just when thought we are ready to take-off, there is a Gandhi to bring us crashing back to the Third World.


Back                          Top

«« Back
 
 
 
  Search Articles
 
  Special Annoucements