Author: S.Gurumurthy
Publication: The New Indian Express
Date: January 5, 2007
URL: http://www.newindpress.com/column/News.asp?Topic=-97&Title=S%2EGurumurthy&ID=IE620061115230938&nDate=&Sub=&Cat
"What is it that keeps the country down",
asked the speaker. A young man in the audience replied unhesitatingly: "Undoubtedly
the institution of caste that kept the majority low castes and the society
backward" and added "it continues".
The speaker replied, "May be". But,
pausing for a moment, he added, "May not be". Shocked, the young
man angrily asked him to explain his "may-not-be" theory.
The speaker calmly mentioned just one fact
that clinched the debate. He said, "Before the British rule in India,
over two-thirds - yes, two-thirds - of the Indian kings belonged to what is
today known as the Other Backward Castes (OBCs).
"It is the British," he said, "who
robbed the OBCs - the ruling class running all socio-economic institutions
- of their power, wealth and status." So it was not the upper caste which
usurped the OBCs of their due position in the society?
The speaker's assertion that it was not so
was founded on his study - unbelievably painstaking study for years and decades
in the archives in India, England and Germany. He could not be maligned as
a 'saffron' ideologue and what he said could not be dismissed thus. He was
Dharampal, a Gandhian in ceaseless search of truth like his preceptor Gandhi
himself was, but a Gandhian with a difference. He ran no ashram on state aid
to do 'Gandhigiri'.
Admitting that "he and those like him
do not know much about our own society", the young man who questioned
Dharampal - Banwari is his name - became his student. By meticulous research
of the British sources over decades, Dharampal demolished the myth that India
was backward educationally or economically when the British entered. Citing
the Christian missionary William Adam's report on indigenous education in
Bengal and Bihar in 1835 and 1838, Dharampal established that at that time
there were 100,000 schools in Bengal, one school for about 500 boys; that
the indigenous medical system that included inoculation against small-pox.
He also proved by reference to other materials
that Adam's record was 'no legend'. He relied on Sir Thomas Munroe's report
to the Governor at about the same time to prove similar statistics about schools
in Madras. He also found that the education system in the Punjab during the
Maharaja Ranjit Singh's rule was equally extensive. He estimated that the
literary rate in India before the British was higher than that in England.
Citing British public records he established,
on the contrary, that 'British had no tradition of education or scholarship
or philosophy from 16th to early 18th century, despite Shakespeare, Bacon,
Milton, Newton, etc'. Till then education and scholarship in the UK was limited
to select elite. He cited Alexander Walker's Note on Indian education to assert
that it was the monitorial system of education borrowed from India that helped
Britain to improve, in later years, school attendance which was just 40, 000,
yes just that, in 1792. He then compared the educated people's levels in India
and England around 1800. The population of Madras Presidency then was 125
lakhs and that of England in 1811 was 95 lakhs. Dharampal found that during
1822-25 the number of those in ordinary schools in Madras Presidency was around
1.5 lakhs and this was after great decay under a century of British intervention.
As against this, the number attending schools
in England was half - yes just half - of Madras Presidency's, namely a mere
75,000. And here to with more than half of it attending only Sunday schools
for 2-3 hours! Dharampal also established that in Britain 'elementary system
of education at people's level remained unknown commodity' till about 1800!
Again he exploded the popularly held belief that most of those attending schools
must have belonged to the upper castes particularly Brahmins and, again with
reference to the British records, proved that the truth was the other way
round.
During 1822-25 the share of the Brahmin students
in the indigenous schools in Tamil-speaking areas accounted for 13 per cent
in South Arcot to some 23 per cent in Madras while the backward castes accounted
for 70 per cent in Salem and Tirunelveli and 84 per cent in South Arcot.
The situation was almost similar in Malayalam,
Oriya and Kannada-speaking areas, with the backward castes dominating the
schools in absolute numbers. Only in the Telugu-speaking areas the share of
the Brahmins was higher and varied from 24 to 46 per cent. Dharampal's work
proved Mahatma Gandhi's statement at Chatham House in London on October 20,
1931 that "India today is more illiterate than it was fifty or hundred
years ago" completely right.
Not many know of Dharampal or of his work
because they have still not heard of the Indian past he had discovered. After,
long after, Dharampal had established that pre-British India was not backward
a Harvard University Research in the year 2005 (India's Deindustrialisation
in the 18th and 19th Centuries by David Clingingsmith and Jeffrey G Williamson)
among others affirmed that "while India produced about 25 percent of
world industrial output in 1750, this figure had fallen to only 2 percent
by 1900." The Harvard University Economic Research also established that
the Industrial employment in India also declined from about 30 to 8.5 per
cent between 1809-13 and 1900, thus turning the Indian society backward.
PS: This great warrior who established the
truth - the truth that was least known - that India was not backward when
the British came, but became backward only after they came, is no more. He
passed away two weeks ago on October 26, 2006, at Sevagram at Warda.
Comment: gurumurthy@epmltd.com
