Author: Beth Yahp
Publication:
Date: November 12, 2007
*A fiction writer writes in support of journalists
*
Dear Prime Minister Abdullah,
26 September 2007 saw two thousand lawyers
"Walk for Justice" to defend the good name and protest the sliding
standards of their profession. "When lawyers march," said Ambiga
Sreenevasan, President of the Bar Council, "something must be wrong."
Last Saturday (10 November 2007), 40,000 people
from all walks of life and all ages walked through rain-drenched Kuala Lumpur,
skirting roadblocks, locked LRT stations, FRU batons, tear gas and water cannons,
as well as weeks of misinformation and propaganda through the mainstream media
and hacked alternative media. They marched to show their disappointment in
the current electoral system and their hopes for reform.
Malaysian citizens travelled for hours through
the night from all over the country to play cat-and-mouse in Kuala Lumpur
with an intimidating array of security forces, whose role was clearly not
to secure our safety.
I saw men armed only with shouted slogans
beaten with batons and shields and thrown to the ground. I saw an old woman
in a wheelchair halted by a barricade of troops, wielding a deafening siren
at her ears. I saw a child clinging to his mother's shoulders being crushed
back, and back. He looked terrified, and rightly so.
This was at Jalan Mahameru, not Masjid Jamek
where, in spite of what IGP Tan Sri Musa Hassan described as police "restraint"
(Sunday Star, 11 Nov 2007), unarmed marchers, including journalists, were
beaten, teargassed and bombarded by chemical-laced water cannons. At Jalan
Mahameru, we faced two rows of riot police, smashing batons against their
shields. I saw and photographed people dropping to the ground around me.
This should be the journalist's privilege,
to be allowed to witness and report the uncensored fruits of that act of witness.
But in this country, the journalists and their editors are not afforded even
this, or any other kind of professional privilege, or protection, in order
to carry out their jobs according to the Journalists' Code of Ethics. That
is, among other things, to pursue factual accuracy and report objectively,
without fear or favour.
Instead, journalism in Malaysia seems to be
ruled by a Code of Fear and Favour. Here, our mainstream journalists and editors
are directly or indirectly on the State's payroll, and therefore accountable
to the State. Those who aren't are kept on a tight leash of precarious licences
and legislation designed to pit self-censorship against financial ruin. Which
the bosses will prioritise is a no-brainer.
It seems to me our media professionals do
their best to navigate these treacherous waters, getting by in terms of professional
pride through little acts of bravery, defiance and subterfuge. The travesty
of it is that, in a true democracy, they shouldn't have to.
Our journalists and editors shouldn't have
to find themselves in the pitiful position of being cowed mouthpieces of the
State, obediently failing to report once a news blackout is ordered, or "reporting"
factual inaccuracies of an astounding magnitude.
Like most of your state controlled media,
Prime Minister Abdullah, yesterday's Sunday Star reported only the IGP's version
of Saturday's events. Journalism 101 requires a range of eyewitnesses to describe
an event objectively yet only your Ministers were allowed airtime; only aggrieved
shopkeepers were interviewed and photos of traffic jams published, to support
our Deputy PM's lament that the march only served to disrupt traffic, create
loss of business and "mar the general perception others have of our society".
The police were depicted as being "forced"
to use their batons, boots, shields, helmets, trucks, water cannons and helicopters
against unarmed men, women and children (New Sunday Times, November 11, 2007).
This reconstruction of reality is one that
I, and 40,000 other marchers, do not recognise. In spite of what we saw and
experienced, we are told that we were only 4000 in number and that 245 of
us were detained, as opposed to the 24 I later saw released at IPPK (Police
Contingent Headquarters), Kuala Lumpur. It was later reported in the NST (12
November 2007) that the majority of detentions were pre-emptive, taking place
outside Kuala Lumpur the day before. The reasons for arrest included being
in possession of yellow t-shirts and bandanas.
Yes, there were massive traffic jams in KL
that day, and yes, I saw shopkeepers hurriedly pull down their shutters, but
only when the FRU and police amassed in battle formation at Central Market.
However, logic tells us that the traffic jams were caused by numerous police
roadblocks and other hindrances to public transport as much as by our march,
which was marshalled and orderly.
We were constantly told to keep to the pavements,
not to throw rubbish or disrupt public property, and even not to trample on
plants along our way. Many people stuck in jams wound down their windows as
we passed, smiling and shaking our hands. Others looked annoyed, of course.
I'm sitting at my local late night kopi tiam
as I write this. It's filled with college students chatting and watching football
to go with their teh tarik and cigarettes. I can see how successful your media
machinery is, Prime Minister, from what they say. They use the word "riots"
to talk about the march, which even a police spokesman described as, for the
most part, peaceful (RTM2 news, 10 November 2007).
This is no surprise given the propaganda clips
that have been running as part of news bulletins on RTM1 and 2 for the past
few months, intercutting flag-burning with demonstrators getting their heads
bashed in. These, as any adman will confirm, effectively equate demonstrations
of any sort with escalating acts of violence on both sides. "Ini bukan
budaya kita," are the stern words of warning.
On TraxxFM, I've heard an odd and therefore
oddly outstanding song about democracy being played frequently, a lullaby
sung in a soothing paternal voice, about how taking democracy to the streets
leads to a loss of self-respect and violence, which is not our way. This song
is in stark contrast to the ones TraxxFM's hip and joking DJs usually play.
This psychological embedding seems odd, Prime
Minister, in the year we celebrate our 50 years of Independence, which was
won exactly by our forefathers taking their struggle for freedom, equality
and justice to the streets, as well as the media and the discussion table.
They did so peacefully then, as we did so last Saturday.
Prime Minister Abdullah, one of the reasons
we marchers, men, women, children, and even incapacitated old folks, braved
confrontation in the streets of Kuala Lumpur last Saturday was to call for
"equal access to the media" as part of BERSIH's push for electoral
reforms, including the use of indelible ink, clean electoral rolls and the
abolition of untraceable postal votes.
I didn't wear yellow on the march because
even though I'm a sympathiser with the struggle for electoral reform, I'm
also a witness to both sides of the story. But I wore my yellow ribbon of
"press freedom", proudly, even though I'm not a journalist. I'm
still wearing it now, with the poignant realisation that I can only write
this letter, without fear or favour, precisely because I'm not a mainstream
Malaysian journalist. Of course, whether any of your editors will publish
it or not is entirely a different matter.
That little scrap of ribbon, like the seemingly
frail ribbon of marchers patiently weaving their way from all over the city
to the Yang Di Pertuan Agong's palace last Saturday, is symbolic of something
far larger and far more important than our aching legs or bruises or our shivers
caused by sitting uncomplainingly in the rain while the leaders delivered
our memorandum to the King.
It symbolizes what you have encouraged us
repeatedly to celebrate and embrace: our "Merdeka Spirit" of independence
that causes the rakyat to come out, in spite of fear and intimidation, to
show their grave concern when the state of things seems very wrong indeed.
This is, despite attempts at historical revisionism, a part of our Malaysian
culture.
With all due respect, Prime Minister, your
admonition on the eve of the march: "Saya pantang dicabar," (Utusan
Malaysia, 9 November 2007) is rather an odd thing for the leader of a democratic
nation to say, given that the basic rule of democracy is the right of all
citizens to challenge, and to defend against challenge. Everyone is entitled
to this right, whether in their living rooms or in Parliament.
Challenges and debates also constantly take
place in the media, whose fundamental role is to provide factual information
and objective viewpoints by journalists and editors, as well as to allow equal
access to publication and broadcast by proponents from either side of any
argument.
Only in this way can we, ordinary citizens,
partake in democracy. Only then can we weigh up differing statements and opinions
against accountable facts. We may be allowed to vote, yes, but how can we
choose effectively without freedom of media access and information?
When this integral pillar of any democratic
system is obstructed, and belittled, as it is in Malaysia, we cannot claim
to live in a democracy. Our mainstream media then becomes merely a tool of
the State, used to hoodwink, brainwash and intimidate the people it should
rightly be serving. Instead, we, the people, are spoon-fed, led and expected
to go quietly like sheep to any foregone conclusion.
If we beg to differ, offer alternative information
and viewpoints, or even protest, we are called beruk. I rather think it preferable
to be a monkey, curious, inventive and mischievous, than a sheep trotting
meekly to my pen, or the slaughterhouse, nose pointed to the ground.
Prime Minister, we are indeed not Pakistan
or Myanmar, as your Information Minister Datuk Seri Zainuddin Maidin blustered
on Al Jazeera (10 November 2007), accusing them of presenting a contrary view
to what has appeared on our Malaysian news, and of only talking to the opposition,
not our Government representatives-even as they were interviewing him.
This is a case of the pot calling the kettle
black, since almost no opposition figures are allowed to speak in our mainstream
media, although their images are used in conjunction with images of street
violence, for example, to influence viewers' opinions about them.
"Malaysia… is a democratic country,"
Zainuddin fumed. But based on your State's handling of the rakyat's peaceful
march last Saturday, Prime Minister, and your own media coverage prior to
and about the actual event, it's hard to entirely agree.
Unfortunately for Malaysia, this is the perception
that will be further broadcast internationally, by journalists and editors
who are fortunately less muzzled than their mainstream Malaysian colleagues.
Therefore, Prime Minister Abdullah, I sincerely
urge you and your Government, as our democratically elected leaders, to "walk
the talk" and unmuzzle our journalists, editors and broadcasters. I entreat
you to fully and fairly endorse and practice democracy in our country. That
is, democracy for everyone, not just a powerful few.
Thank you.
Yours sincerely,
Beth Yahp
Author
Petaling Jaya, 12 November 2007
(Beth Yahp's prize-winning novel, The Crocodile
Fury, has been translated and published in several languages. She wrote the
libretto for the contemporary opera Moon Spirit Feasting premiered at the
2000 Adelaide International Festival of the Arts, with productions also in
Melbourne, Berlin, Zurich and Tokyo. It won APRA's Best Classical Composition
Award in 2002. Beth's short fiction, essays and articles have appeared in
numerous publications in Australia, South-east Asia and Europe. She is currently
Fiction Editor for Off the Edge, a Malaysian business/ lifestyle/ culture
magazine.)
