Author:
Publication: Rediff.com
Date: September 17, 2008
URL: http://in.rediff.com/news/2008/sep/17guest.htm
'In peace prepare for war, in war prepare
for peace. The art of war is of vital importance to the state. It is matter
of life and death, a road either to safety or to ruin. Hence under no circumstances
can it be neglected.' -- Tsun Tzu, ancient Chinese philosopher
The Students Islamic Movement of India, Wikipedia
informs us, was formed in Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh, in April 1977. The stated
mission of SIMI -- the 'liberation of India' from Western materialistic cultural
influence and to convert it into an Islamic society -- makes it an enemy of
the State of India.
Wikipedia further points out that 'fears exist
in government circles that SIMI has been penetrated by al Qaeda. It goes on
to add that it is suspected that SIMI after being banned by the Government
of India is now also operating under a different name of Indian Majahideen,
an outfit that has taken responsibility for the successive blasts in India
over the past several months.' Yet SIMI remains virtually un-debated by the
polity and the intelligentsia of the country.
Contrary to the popular belief that SIMI is
run by uneducated, misdirected and poor Muslim youth, readers may be surprised
at the fact that SIMI's founding president, Mohammad Ahmadullah Siddiqi, is
a professor of journalism and public relations at the Western Illinois University.
And with the spate of terror mails sent by hacking Wi-Fi connections, it seems
that SIMI is even to this day run by the educated, privileged and the moneyed.
Despite such repeated terror attempts, SIMI
is largely an unknown commodity in India, especially to the common man. What
are its objectives? What are its guiding philosophies? How does it operate
and what makes it the centrifugal force of terrorism in India? Crucially,
what makes it devastating despite a ban by the central government?
The answers to all these questions are not
difficult and need not be a subject matter of speculation as these are in
the public domain. Yet, some preliminary understanding of SIMI provides the
text to the polity that intellectually facilitates its existence, sustains
its growth and shields it from the reach of law, all of which collectively
make SIMI a potent force in the Indian context.
SIMI -- a fact file
Basic research about SIMI reveals something
stunning as well as chilling. SIMI believes in leading human life on the basis
of the Quran as well as propagation of Islam in India. While there is nothing
wrong about these two objectives, as these are guaranteed by the Constitution,
the third -- jihad for the cause of Islam -- makes it a potent terrorist organisation.
SIMI does not believe in a nation-state. To
amplify further, SIMI's ultimate aim is to have an Islamic caliphate with
an Islamic India an integral part of such an arrangement. And to achieve this,
SIMI sees secular, democratic modern India as a hurdle. Yet it is the secular
cabal that acts as a cheerleader for SIMI!
Consequently, it does not believe in the concept
of Indian nation, culture and values. And to achieve its self-professed goal,
SIMI seeks to wage a low-intensity war against the Government of India so
as to liquidate the very concept of India. In this attempt, SIMI seeks to
utilise the youth in the propagation of Islam and also to mobilise support
for jihad and establish a Shariat-based Islamic rule in India through Islami
Inqilab.
In effect, whatever it may be christened or
defined by the secular polity in India, SIMI is basically a fundamentalist
organisation that not only rejects other beliefs, ideals, as well as other
'anti-Islamic cultures', it in fact seeks to systematically eliminate them.
Ideologically, SIMI maintains that the concepts of secularism, democracy and
nationalism, keystones of the Indian Constitution, are antithetical to Islam.
Parallel to its rejection of secularism, democracy
and nationalism is its oft-repeated objective of restoration of the 'caliphate',
emphasis on ummah and the need for jihad to establish the supremacy of Islam.
Further, it reveres Osama bin Laden while it does not believe that Jammu and
Kashmir to be an integral part of India.
SIMI is also reported to get generous financial
assistance from the World Assembly of Muslim Youth, Riyadh, the International
Islamic Federation of Students' Organisations in Kuwait, and of course the
dreaded ISI of Pakistan. Further, SIMI gets operational and training assistance
from the Jamaat-e-Islam units in Pakistan, Bangladesh and Nepal, Hizb-ul-Mujahideen,
and the Harkat-ul-Jehad-al Islami Bangladesh.
And in the process, SIMI is at war with India.
And in this war SIMI gets all the funding, training as well as strategic help
from various countries. If Osama provides it ideological inspiration, Pakistan
and others provide it strategic, financial and military support, overtly or
covertly.
But what about support within India?
While it may be easier to blame others, especially
in the neighbourhood, the fact of the matter is that the success of SIMI lies
exclusively within India. It is patently unjust to blame an entire community.
Quite the contrary, the rise and success of SIMI is a direct product of our
secular polity and the manner in which successive governments have handled
this convoluted yet crucial issue.
It may be recalled that SIMI was first banned
-- the first and preliminary steps at containing it -- by the then National
Democratic Alliance government on September 27, 2001, immediately following
the terror attacks in the US on September 11, 2001. This ban remained till
September 27, 2003. In this interregnum, several prosecutions were launched
against its members under the provisions of the now repealed Prevention Of
Terrorism Act.
The second ban, in effect the extension of
the first, was between September 27, 2003 and September 27, 2005. The government
of India had effected a third ban on SIMI from February 8, 2006. Therefore
SIMI was in effect legally in existence between September 28, 2005, and February
7, 2006.
The third ban on SIMI was lifted by Delhi
high court tribunal on August 5, 2008, which has since been stayed by the
Supreme Court. 'Material given by the home ministry is insufficient, so ban
cannot be continued,' Justice Geeta Mittal, a sitting Delhi high court judge,
had said while lifting the ban. Obviously, the hydraulic power of the secular
polity, with a proven soft corner to SIMI, had its desired effect on our bureaucracy.
But how did secular India react to all these
acts of SIMI? Consider this:
Mulayam Singh Yadav and Lalu Prasad Yadav
said the ban on SIMI was wrong in the first place.
Congress spokesperson Shakeel Ahmed said the
order was "no setback" to the government and added, "Wherever
terrorist attacks have taken place in the recent past -- Rajasthan, Maharashtra,
Karnataka, Gujarat -- it is the state governments that are investigating the
matter. It is their responsibility to submit the evidence against SIMI to
the central government," implying that it was the state government that
needs to act against SIMI, not the central government.
Salman Khurshid, president of the Uttar Pradesh
Congress committee, was the counsel defending SIMI in the high court and in
the Supreme Court against the ban.
Others, including the Communists, have ensured
that their responses are either muted or guarded, lest they be branded as
communalists by others in the polity.
With such wonderful local support, why them
blame others including the ISI? The issue is not of the terrorists and their
activity. Rather it is something quite serious that points out to the serious
drift in our national polity and our skewed concept of secularism.
It may be noted that while our secular polity
was explicitly exonerating SIMI, a study by the Institute of Conflict Management
headed by K P S Gill, had clearly listed over 100 terror incidents from 2000
to 2008 which involves SIMI. Yet, such blatant and patent support to SIMI
by our polity is inexplicable.
Substantiating the finding of this institute,
even a spokesperson of the Indian government told the Unlawful Activities
(Prevention) Tribunal held in New Delhi that contrary to notions that SIMI's
activities declined following its ban, the organisation "had stepped
up its subversive activities and was involved in almost all major explosions,
communal violence and circulation of inflammatory material across the country."
And it is this group that the secular polity virtually exonerates without
any remorse!
Let us not make any mistake -- we are amidst
a war, a war with a faceless enemy. But it is not the only advantage that
our enemy has. As explained above, the approach of our polity rationalises,
legalises and sanctifies terrorism in India. It is this attitude of the secular
polity makes the faceless enemy that much potent. It is time that we the ordinary
people realised this simple fact.
As the Chinese philosopher said centuries
ago, war is for peace. Unfortunately a country that has Ashoka (who renounced
war and became a pacifist) as its model and hence does not even cognise the
fact that it is amidst a war runs the risk of being a failure as a State and
faces the prospect of disintegration.
It is time that we need to wage a war, both
against such terrorists and those who are apologists for such terrorists.
In the interregnum, of course, politicians from the safe haven of Z-plus category
security can continue to pontificate. Whether we will be alive to hear them
is a different matter.
- The author is a Chennai-based chartered
accountant. He can be contacted at mrv1000@rediffmail.com
