Author: Kenyon J. Hull
Publication: Faithfreedom.org
Date: June 6, 2009
URL: http://www.faithfreedom.org/2009/06/06/obama-the-fool/
Early in his speech in Cairo BHO mentioned
"centuries of co-existence and cooperation." When and where? For
1400 years, Islam has waged jihad against all civilizations including Western
Civilization. The history of Islam from Arabia was followed by the rapid conquest
of North Africa and invasion and conquest of Spain, and a thrust into France
that carried the crescent to the gates of Paris. It took half a millennium
of reconquest to expel Islam from Western Europe.
O mentions "tensions fed by colonialism;
a Cold War where Muslims were treated as proxies; change brought by modernity
and globalization which led many Muslims to view the West as hostile to…Islam."
BHO lists ways the West has mistreated Islam. Not a word about the jihad doctrine,
not a word about Islamic supremism and the imperative to make war against
and subjugate non-Muslims. Not a word about the culture of hatred and contempt
for non-Muslims that existed long before the spread of American culture.
O says, "Violent extremists….have
bred more fear and mistrust." The idea that jihadists are a small minority
is universally accepted dogma. However, all Muslims are commanded by the Quran
to be jihadists. Sura 47: Whenever you encounter the ones who disbelieve (during
wartime) seize them by their necks, until once you have subdued them
then tie them up as prisoners, either in order
to release them later on, or else to ask for ransom, until war lays down her
burdens.
Also, the attacks of September 11, 2001 and
continued efforts of these extremists to engage in violence against civilians
has American and Western countries viewing Islam as hostile to their existence.
It is also Islamic texts and teachings that inspired these attacks that also
fuel these perceptions.
O says, "The first nation to recognize
my country was Morocco…in the signing of the Treaty of Tripoli in 1796."
A very clever half truth. The treaty was drawn up in an attempt to put an
end to raids on American shipping by Barbary Coast pirates. Tripoli was a
Muslim stronghold used as a base of operations for the pirates who habitually
preyed upon our shipping and enslavement of our seamen. Piracy, kidnapping
and enslavement of our seamen remained a problem despite the Treaty of 1796.
Also, Tripoli demanded increased tribute payment in 1801. Thomas Jefferson
did not like paying tribute and was the first president to use force against
them. He refused to increase tribute and Tripoli declared war on the United
States. Jefferson had the Navy blockade Tripoli from 1803-1805. A Marine contingent
captured the city of Derna and the Pasha of Tripoli signed a Treaty promising
to extract no more tribute. It was not until Madison's presidency that hostilities
finally stopped when he declared war on Algeria.
BHO: "I seek a new beginning between
America and Muslims…based on mutual respect; based on principles of justice;…tolerance
and the dignity of all human beings."
These are concepts imbedded in Western Civilization
and not always shared with other cultures and O should know this. How clever
is this man? A Muslim will never respect a non-Muslim for the Quran tells
him that Muslims are the best of people and to subjugate all non-Muslims.
A non-Muslim has no standing in court against a Muslim-so much for equal justice
under the law. Muslims can marry up to four wives, and can marry pre-pubescent
girls. Men are commanded to beat an unruly wife according to the Quran. A
son inherits twice as much as a daughter. Such is justice and tolerance in
Islam.
In the world of Islam, all non-Muslims are
treated as second-class citizens. They must not set foot in a mosque. They
cannot build a church or repair any old one. They must not make noise when
they assemble. They cannot bear arms. Just to give you an idea about how Islam
treats its dhimmi citizens, roughly 270 million souls have been killed as
a result of 1400 years of jihad and Muslim rule. So much for the dignity of
the human being.
O: "…change cannot happen overnight."
Why is it America's responsibility to dispel mistrust that Muslims feel for
the West? It is not mistrust we must address with the Muslim world but how
we can keep them from taking over our country. Islam is engaged in a stealth
jihad to subvert the government of this country by any and all means possible
and to turn it into a Muslim country. They have a plan for taking over America
just as they have a plan for taking over Europe-and look at Europe now. It
is ready to topple to Islam within another 10 years or sooner. When Americans
realize that we are at war with Islam, then we can begin an intelligent defense
of our way of life.
O says: "…my father came from a
Kenyan family that includes generations of Muslims." He avoids saying
his father was a Muslim, which would open him to charges of apostasy. And
the penalty for denying the faith of Islam is death. Of course, this may not
matter. With a friend like him as president of the USA he is of more value
to them alive.
O says that Thomas Jefferson kept a "Holy"
Quran in his personal library. This is a smooth and smarmy half truth. Did
Jefferson study Islam? Only to know the treachery therein. See the comments
about the Treaty of Tripoli. Also Jefferson when Ambassador to France in 1786
met the Ambassador Abdrahaman of Tripoli to iron out relations. Jefferson
repeatedly stated that we were not at war with Tripoli and Abdrahaman corrected
him. He stated that Sura 47 of the Quran clearly states that America was at
war with Tripoli. So Jefferson consulted his Quran to understand how we were
at war with Tripoli. Islam is at war with all non-Muslim nations, then and
now.
O says: …I consider it my responsibility
as POTUS to fight against negative stereotypes of Islam…" If these
exist, why is it his responsibility? What about Jews? Hindus? Blacks? Southerners?
If only Islam, Why? On what Basis? By what justification?
O says: "America is not a stereotype
of a self-interested empire." Why did he not take the opportunity to
say how we extend a helping hand to our defeated enemies. What about the billions
we have spent on Islamic societies.
O says there are seven million Muslims in
America. Why would he enlarge the truth. There are probably less than two
million. He says we can live in peace and security, get an education and work
with dignity. No mention here of the Islamic supremacist agenda that would
deny the right of non-Muslims to live with dignity.
O: "When innocents in Bosnia and Darfun
are slaughtered…" O pandering to Muslims as he picks two places
where he believes the chief victims are Muslims.
O says: "…however, history has…been
a record of…tribes subjugating one another…" This has been
done so under the divine imperative to make non-Muslims "feel themselves
subdued." (Quran 9:24)
O says: "…any world order that elevates
one nation or group of people over another will inevitably fail." Islam's
goal in America is to eliminate and destroy Western Civilization from within
and 'sabotaging' its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers
so that it is eliminated and God's religion is made victorious over all other
religions. Does this count as an attempt to elevate "one nation or group
of people over another?"
O: "America is not and never will be
at war with Islam." "…we reject the killing of innocent men,
women and children." To say that America will never be at war with Islam
is a grave error. Can he predict the future? The definition of "innocent
is a Western Christian concept that does not have the same meaning in Islam.
Only Muslims can be innocent but non-Muslims in the "house of war"
are never innocent.
O in talking about extremists in Afghanistan
talks about Islam and America combining to fight them and quotes the Quran,
"…whoever kills an innocent, it is as if he killed all mankind….."
His reference is to Quran 5:32. 5:33 doesn't convey the beautiful spirit (more
O sleight of hand), mandating crucifixion or amputation for those who fight
against Allah and Muhammad.
O says: " Islam is not part of the problem
in combating violent extremism-it is an important part of promoting peace."
No mention of the imperative within Islamic text and teachings to subjugate
Infidels.
O states that, "The sooner the extremists
are isolated and unwelcome in Muslim communities, the sooner we will all be
safer." Why will this happen now? On what basis does O think or hope
it will?
O compares the Jewish Holocaust with the Gaza
Strips refugees is unconscionable. I am ashamed for his speech and apologize
to all Jews. The Gaza Strip refugees suffer daily humiliations all while lobbing
countless missiles into Israel. Israel must defend its people. A culture of
hatred and violence makes Israel's actions quite necessary. O, Americans are
not interested in "Palestinian" aspirations. We all are interested
in helping and strengthening Israel-the only democracy in the Middle East.
O's two state solution will not curb the jihad
attacks against Israel. He says "Palestinians" must abandon violence.
He then segues into how black America suffered under slavery. To compare "Palestinians"
with black Americans is unconscionable. For the comparison to hold, black
Americans must have been launching daily rocket attacks against white civilians
and blowing themselves up at segregated lunch counters during crowded lunch
hours.
O says: "…"Palestinians"
[must] focus on what they can build." They have been asked to build for
years and have never heeded the call. Israelis gave them $14 million for greenhouses
during the Gaza turnover. They turned them into weapons smuggling tunnels.
O is seeking a world in which no nations hold
nuclear weapons. Would he give up ours and expect the world to follow? Then
he says Iran has a right to peaceful nuclear power!!! Here is a country that
has enough oil to power itself for a millennium. Here is a country that would
wipe Israel off the map if they had nuclear weapons. Is this man a fool?
O talks of democracy. "No system of government….should
be imposed upon one nation by another." Does this include Sharia? O does
not understand that in Islam there is a very different meaning of "justice"
and "freedom." Or maybe he misunderstands like a fox.
O discusses religious freedom. "Islam
has a proud tradition of tolerance. We see it in the history of Andalusia
and Cordoba…" O yea who has not read history is doomed to repeat
it. But America does not want to go down the hole with you O. When Islam was
master over Spain, all non believers were killed or made slaves. The 'people
of the book" (Christians and Jews) were allowed, if they did not convert,
to pay tax and practice their religion. They could not build new churches
or repair the old ones. O knows that the laws of dhimmitude gives his claim
of a "proud tradition of tolerance" the same hollow ring as stories
of prominent American blacks from the slavery and Jim Crow era's.
Fredrick Douglass and Booker T. Washington
were great men but their accomplishments not only do not erase or controvert
the oppression of their people, but render them all the more poignant and
haunting. Whatever the Christians and Jews of Al-Andalus accomplished, they
were still dhimmis. The rights and privileges they had were not out of any
sense of the dignity of all people before God, or the equality of all before
the law, but at the sufferance of their Muslim overlords.
"People in every country should be free
to choose and live their faith based upon the persuasion of the mind, heart,
and soul." -Obama
"If anyone changes his religion, kill
him." Muhammad, the prophet of Islam.
O discusses women's rights. How will O overcome
a culture with teachings like this:
O The Quran likens a woman to a field, to
be used by a man as he wills (2:223)
O A woman's testimony is worth half that of
a man's. (2:282)
O A man can have up to four wives and sex
with a slave girl. (4:3)
O A son's inheritance is twice the size of
that of a daughter. (4:11)
O Husbands are to beat disobedient wives.
(4:34)
O Allows for marriage to pre-pubescent girls.
(65:4)
The dignity, equality and freedom within Islam
is breathtaking is it not?
O preposterously suggests that our immoral
pop culture causes the pious, modest Muslims to engage in jihad against America.
Jihad theorist Sayyid Qutb was scandalized by dancing at a church social in
Greely, Colorado in 1948. Eight centuries before Qutb a recurring feature
of Muslim polemic was against the sexual immorality of the "Franks."
O proposes billions in taxes by offering Islam:
O Expanded exchange program for their students.
O Muslim student internships.
O Online education and networks.
O New corps of business volunteers.
O Summit on Entrepreneurship.
O Fund supporting technological development
in Muslim countries.
O Transfer ideas to marketplace to create
jobs.
O Open centers of scientific excellence in
Africa, Middle East & SE Asia.
O Appoint new science envoys to develop new
sources of energy, create green jobs, digitize records, clean water and grow
new crops.
O Partner with OIC to eradicate polio.
O Partner with Muslim communities to promote
child and maternal health.
O, Americans are not ready to partner with
Muslims in such a massive and expensive manner. What will be the returns for
this massive effort? Islam still wants to subjugate Infidel Americans. The
new Congress with sensible individuals will nip this in the bud before it
even gets to the hatching stage.
DMN, you cannot just run the unvarnished half
truths in a speech like O's. Please give us some intelligent commentary.
