Author: Global Hindu Heritage Foundation
Publication: Google News
Date: October 4, 2010
URL: http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics/browse_thread/thread/85d31de555c29abb
Build fitting Rama Temple
GHHF welcomes the verdict delivered by Allahabad
court of Lucknow Bench in a majority decision that "disputed site"
was the birthplace of Lord Rama. Ram was born at the spot and that his idol
should remain there. The court's observation that the "disputed structure
cannot be treated as a mosque as it came into existence against the tenets
of Muslims." In its judgment court says that it was built over a destroyed
temple.
Once the court decrees that the "disputed
site" was the birthplace of Lord Rama, how can the Court say that the
Ramjanma Bhumi land should be divided into three parts and distribute it to
three groups? This unwarranted, unasked for verdict has to be challenged.
This is not a fitting verdict by an esteemed court.
First of all the judgment is surprising, disappointing
and astonishing because of the fact that none of the plaintiffs had asked
for the division of the land into three parts. Clearly the court went beyond
it's jurisdiction. The decision is more of political nature to appease the
Muslims than a legal, rational, logical decision based on the evidence. This
unprecedented ruling is going to pave the way for others to ask for
legitimacy of occupying as many as 2000 Hindu Temples that were converted
into masjids over the last few centuries including, Mathura, Taj Mahal, Kasi
Temple, and other Masjids. Sri Sita Ram Goel's book "Hindu Temples: What
Happened to them?" and Praful Goradia's book "Hindu Masjids"
should be eye openers for all Hindus and they should work to re-establish
the true history of Bharat and rewrite the negated history; expose the concealed,
contrived, manufactured and false history. (Links to both books are listed
below)
If the Hindus are not on alert and do not
defend their culture, the court's decision can encourage the usurpation of
Hindu Lands and Hindu Temples. It should be challenged on the ground that
no plaintiff has
asked for the division and also that the court went beyond it's legal nature
of the case. It should not take a political decision on the issues.
What the Allahabad High Court said is that
"you grab Hindu lands and demolish Hindu Temple, we will legitimize it."
The court said we will follow the government policy of "you grab it,
we regularize it." Can any body find the difference between the Court's
judgment and political appeasement?
Secularism in the constitution should be rooted
out? Why? First of all no body is able to define it, not even the framers
of the constitution. In the name of secularism, Hindus have been denied of
their freedom,
independence and liberty. In the words of Girilal Jain, who has written a
seminal article in 1993, the framers of the constitution "pit secularism
against Hinduism which is plainly absurd. Hindus do not need
the imported concept of secularism in order to be able to show respect towards
other faiths. That comes naturally to them. For theirs is an inclusive faith
which provides for every form of religious experience
and belief; there can be no heresy or kufr in Hinduism."
GHHF fully supports Justice D. V. Sharma's
opinion who disagreed with the decision of the majority that one-third of
the disputed land should be given to Muslims for construction of a mosque.
On the status of the disputed site e.g. inner and outer courtyards, Justice
Sharma said that the "place of birth is a juristic person and is a deity.
The spirit of divine ever remains present everywhere at all times for anyone
to invoke
in any shape or form in accordance with his own aspirations and it can be
shapeless and formless … It is established that the property in suit
is the site of Janm Bhumi of Ram Chandra Ji and Hindus in general had
the right to worship Charan, Sita Rasoi, other idols and other objects of
worship existed upon the property in suit. It is also established that Hindus
have been worshipping the place in dispute as Janm Sthan
i.e. a birthplace as deity and visiting it as a sacred place of pilgrimage
as of right since time immemorial."
The government, the media, the secularists,
the marxists, and two other major religious groups bent on destroying the
Hindu culture, demolishing Hindu Temples, abusing the Hindu Icons; maligning
the Hindu leaders, and insulting the Hindu Gods and Goddesses, denying the
freedom and liberty to all Hindus, and allowing the burning of the flag of
Bharata Mata openly. They are all conspirators to destroy Sanatana dharma
and suffocate Bharata Mata.
Reacting to the verdict the honorable Home
Minister P. Chidambaram replying to a question on the demolition of Babri
Masjid said, "That act was completely unacceptable and it was an act
done by people who took law and order into their hands. That remains, in my
view, a criminal act."
Dear Mr. Chidambaram, would you also say that
the acts that lead to the demolition and destruction of more than 2000 Hindu
Temples that were converted into Masjids also Criminal Acts. Can you openly
say it to the nation? Is it possible for you to represent all the people of
the country, instead of small segment of the nation?
Hindus have to be aroused to the images of
Lord Rama as the ideal son, ideal husband, ideal father, and ideal ruler.
If Hindus have to survive and enrich Bharata Mata, Hindus have to stand up
for their rights,
freedom and independence; stand firm to defend their culture, their monuments;
stand ready to protect their Temples, temples lands, and images of their gods
and goddesses; stand tall to defend spirituality that is Bharat; stand together
to learn as well as teach our children about the grandeur and glory of our
past - history, scriptures, sages, art, heritage, scientific advances, literature,
Sanskrit etc.; and stand by our Hindu leaders both spiritual and political
to ensure the justice for all, not just the minorities.
Now all Hindus should get united to build
the most beautiful, magnificent, fitting and grand Temple at the birth place
of Lord Rama on the entire land, not one-third of the disputed land. Hindus
have to be assertive in exercising their god given right to defend, guard,
and protect their Bharat Mata before it is too late. Jai Hind
