Hindu Vivek Kendra
A RESOURCE CENTER FOR THE PROMOTION OF HINDUTVA
   
 
 
«« Back
 
Shurpanakha Defence League needs to brush up its facts

Author: OpIndia Staff
Publication: Opindia.com
Date: February 9, 2018
URL:   http://www.opindia.com/2018/02/shurpanakha-defence-league-needs-to-brush-up-its-facts/

PM Modi’s jibe in the Rajya Sabha has set the cat amongst the pigeons. During his speech, Modi referred to an old speech of ex-Home Minister L K Advani to mention that AADHAR was actually conceptualised at that point. Hearing this, Congress MP Renuka Chaudhury started laughing hysterically.

Rajya Sabha speaker and Vice President Venkaiyah Naidu chided her for her “unruly behaviour”. PM Modi too did not let the opportunity go. He requested the speaker that he must not stop Renuka Chowdhury. He added further, “many years after Ramayan we are getting to hear such a hearty laughter.”

It took a while but soon social media users began deciphering the cryptic comment. There was a debate whether Modi was referring to the Taraka the demon or Shurpanakha, Ravana’s sister. This debate seems to have been settled by left liberals.

NDTV’s Nidhi Razdan batted for “freedom of laughter”:
---------------------------
Nidhi Razdan @Nidhi
Replying to @tavleen_singh
Let anyone laugh the way they want
4:21 PM - Feb 8, 2018
---------------------------
But the slightly slower ones began defending Shurpanakha, thus giving rise to the Shurpanakha Defence League. Sagarika Ghose chose to paint Shurpanakha as the victim of a “patriarchal” society, who was wronged at the hands of a “righteous oh-so-pure male hero”. Her husband Rajdeep Sardesai seemed to concur and retweeted her:
---------------------------
Sagarika Ghose @sagarikaghose
The fate of Surpanakha is violently partriarchal too. A woman who confesses her love for a man constructed into a witch and has her nose and ears cutt off by the righteous oh-sso-pure male hero. All for falling in love!
---------------------------
Columnist Ashok Swain too joined the league, claiming that Shurpanakha  was “misunderstood” and called the act, an “act of cowardice” by a  “male chauvinist”.
---------------------------
Ashok Swain @ashokswai
surpanakha was one of the most misunderstood characters of Ramayan. Ram made fun of her instead of reasoning with her. Severing the nose of a woman for a proposal is not Heroism, nut cowardice act a Male Chauvinist.
---------------------------
Both argued how Shurpanakha’s love for Ram was treated in an unduly harsh manner by Ram. Using such a line of argument perhaps served multiple purposes: defending Shurpanakha was akin to defending the Congress MP who is said to laugh like her PLUS it was a golden chance to train their guns at a Hindu God namely Ram.

Alas, social media users made them realise how their understanding of the incident was totally wrong. History buff social media user TrueIndology parsed through the ancient texts to show that Shurpanakha  was not the victim and had in fact tried to kill and eat Sita, which is why Laxman had to take the step of chopping her nose off.
---------------------------
True Indology @TrueIndology
Lakshmana pierced the nose of Shurpanakha not because he was a male chauvinist. The jealous cannibal Shurpanakha was about to kill and eat Sita@sagarikaghose should be booked for hurting religious sentiments, promoting enemity, disturbing communal harmony, inciting riots

12:27 AM - Feb 9, 2018
---------------------------

It is indeed comical how a mild retort by Modi, to a woman who was uncouth, has evoked such a response that our secular left liberals have begun rewriting Indian texts and have found shelter in attacking Hindu Gods. It is another issue that talking in such a manner about some other religions can trigger off riots.
 
«« Back
 
 
 
  Search Articles
 
  Special Annoucements